05Xrunner wrote in post #6731222
i heard the opposite. that its much more effective then the 100-400
Agreed
bobbyz wrote in post #6731788
I would save $200-$250 more and buy used canon 400mm f5.6. The others that people are recommending don't even come close as far as AF and picture quality is concerned. Eat ramen noodels for a while.
I would rather take a Sigma 500mm w/OS over a 400mm without OS any day, especially if its lighter on the pocketbook. I have had the 50-500, 150-500 OS and the 100-400 IS, and at those distances, IS/OS is very, very handy.
AF speeds on the HSM Sigma lenses are very good, not quite as fast as USM, but pretty darn close, so that argument doesn't necessarily hold up. As for IQ, just depends on which end of the Sigma QA spectrum you happen to fall. With today's micro-AF adjustments, that factor is somewhat mitigated.