does the old sigma 14 3.5 beat the canon 17-40L?
just need a wide lens for traveling~
need the wide side~
so compare the 14 to 17
just compare the photo quality
i know 14<17 
jeremy8_8 Senior Member 391 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: GTA all the time / Calgary during the x-mas. More info | Nov 23, 2008 01:47 | #1 does the old sigma 14 3.5 beat the canon 17-40L? Canon 1Ds III (
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop  6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | Nov 23, 2008 08:28 | #2 Assuming (from other posts) you're using the 5D (i.e. 'full-frame' format), the 17-40L will be far more suitable as a travel wideangle than the extreme and fixed 14L. I know I'm not answering your stated question, but you would feel in almost all cases that the 14L would be too wide. For most travel shots I would expect you'd be looking for 24-35mm on FF. Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 1047 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
