I just set up a very simply home studio with inexpensive lighting and my first hoot of my sonh. Canon Xti, F14, 1/30th, ISO 200.
How did I do?
RebelChick Goldmember 1,070 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Nov 26, 2008 17:42 | #2 |
Nov 26, 2008 18:10 | #3 RebelChick wrote in post #6765273 seems Very Blue to me. could be. I used a WB of flourescent which typically makes it blue(ish). All lights were the flourescent daylight corrected bulbs. Knowledge can be the Absence of Creativity.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thebishopp Goldmember 1,903 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Indiana More info | Nov 26, 2008 18:29 | #4 Think it's because of the WB flourescent you used. Do you like the blue cast? "Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous." My Zen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RebelChick Goldmember 1,070 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Nov 26, 2008 18:30 | #5 either way his skin should be toned down a bit to get the wb more even Cortney B Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 26, 2008 18:36 | #6 thebishopp wrote in post #6765462 Think it's because of the WB flourescent you used. Do you like the blue cast? I do because I thought it brought out his blue eyes. I'll try it again on Auto WB. Knowledge can be the Absence of Creativity.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rmr21 Goldmember 1,938 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2008 More info | Nov 26, 2008 18:47 | #7 eForce wrote in post #6765495 I do because I thought it brought out his blue eyes. I'll try it again on Auto WB. Maybe try the tungsten setting. I always use that indoors when there isn't much natural light available. ..............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thebishopp Goldmember 1,903 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Indiana More info | Nov 26, 2008 18:59 | #8 eForce wrote in post #6765495 I do because I thought it brought out his blue eyes. I'll try it again on Auto WB. Generally, unless it's super off, I will usually use "as shot" WB (I use auto wb on my camera and it's usually spot on or close enough... I will occassionally use "flash" during converting from RAW to Photoshop if I was using a flash and it looks better). "Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous." My Zen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 26, 2008 19:09 | #9 rmr21 wrote in post #6765538 Maybe try the tungsten setting. I always use that indoors when there isn't much natural light available. funny you should say that...my original shot was with tungston (1st pic). I thought that one was really blue (ish). Knowledge can be the Absence of Creativity.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thebishopp Goldmember 1,903 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Indiana More info | Nov 26, 2008 19:11 | #10 Could probably work with the 2nd pic a bit more. The first is REALLY blue and would require much more tweaking with the color balance. The 2nd may just need a slight toning down of the red. "Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous." My Zen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HeatherSik Goldmember 3,434 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan More info | Nov 26, 2008 19:25 | #11 Hello. cute kid you have there. I am impressed that you were able to get him to pose for you. My 15 yo girl hates getting her pictures done. My 11 yo son tolerates it.. LOL Heather S.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 26, 2008 19:31 | #12 HeatherSik wrote in post #6765718 Hello. cute kid you have there. I am impressed that you were able to get him to pose for you. My 15 yo girl hates getting her pictures done. My 11 yo son tolerates it.. LOL The 1st two photos are really blue. the 2nd one he has the smurf effect going on.. The 3rd shot is better but he has a red tone on that one. Have you thought about custom WB?? It is really easy.. Also pull your subject out about 4 - 6 feet from the BG and you will not have the shadow issue.. I see shadows below the balls on the 1st shot.. Nice work with your setup. I did it for a long time and think I did pretty good for what I had.. Keep it up.. ![]() Thanks Heather. Good tips on the proximity. I will try the custom WB. This is all just plug and play right now. I'm not sure what the actual colour temperature is but I'll keep trying. Knowledge can be the Absence of Creativity.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StroupePhotography Senior Member 662 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: South Carolina More info | Nov 28, 2008 08:27 | #14 The last edit you did is much better. Darrell...Canon XT (for sell )..40d.5D..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FocalPrincess Cream of the Crop 8,223 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Hibernating near Hershey More info | Nov 28, 2008 11:35 | #15 Yep, the last edit looks a lot better. Congrats on a studio setup, that's always exciting! Blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1079 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||