Rudi Goldmember  3,751 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2002 Location: Australia More info | Nov 27, 2008 16:39 | #1 Actually, a 20th-year re-affirmation ceremony.    At the end, we had some fun with the car. This is the shot that made me get the Ranger - not enough power to underexpose the surroundings the way I would have liked! We did a whole series of these, even taking the car down to the beach. Unfortunately, they will all have to be worked on to get the results that I was after. The Ranger should save me that headache next time I attempt something like this...   • Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble"  5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Nov 27, 2008 16:44 | #2 those are some really nice shots.. i love the PP on all of them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Nov 27, 2008 18:14 | #3 Continuing from this thread i'm not sure why this event made you get the ranger... the only one where flash was applicable was the last, the background and subject are both fairly underexposed, just open up the aperture a bit and let some more light in and you're good. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2008 18:27 | #4 Can't do that if I want to underexpose the background, Tim. I needed more power from the flash, not less. • Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Nov 27, 2008 18:29 | #5 I guess that's a style thing, to me the background is already too underexposed. But yeah to get a diffuser on a bigger light is needed. Fairly poor expression from her anyway, i'd have chucked it unless it was significant to them for some reason. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2008 19:16 | #6 tim wrote in post #6770553  Fairly poor expression from her anyway, i'd have chucked it unless it was significant to them for some reason. What's her expression have to do with the way I want to have this exposed, Tim? • Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Nov 27, 2008 19:24 | #7 Nothing, you just posted on the photo sharing forum. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2008 19:43 | #8 I did, and you chose to discuss my recent Ranger purchase, so we were discussing exposure. Interesting that you chose to comment on the photo after that and not in the beginning... • Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Nov 27, 2008 19:48 | #9 I just didn't know where to post the comments about the lights! Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Foxgguy2001 Senior Member  355 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Riverside, CA More info | Nov 28, 2008 03:09 | #10 Wow, well I'm no light expert, but I think her expression is just fine, I rather like that it seems suiting given the pose and the vehicle to the rear. I like the style of these....great My humble beginnings: Canon XTI, 17-85 IS, 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jimmer411 Thank god Im green. 866 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Pacific, WA More info | Nov 30, 2008 18:21 | #11 Rudi wrote in post #6770786 I did, and you chose to discuss my recent Ranger purchase, so we were discussing exposure. Interesting that you chose to comment on the photo after that and not in the beginning... And yes, her expression is deliberate, she is posing, after all.
5D3 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-568EX II | YN-622c | YN-622-TX |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dou_b_14 Senior Member  955 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2006 Location: RGV Texas More info | Nov 30, 2008 21:52 | #12 hey these are great..the first one is my favorite though. Looked like fun Canon 5d w/grip / canon 7d/ canon G1X/ 24-70mm 2.8 L/ 17-40mm L/ 50mm 1.4/(2)580ex/ pw's (3) /st-e2/ (2)cp-e3 battery pack/ abr800/ vagabond 2/ calumet genesis 200w(2)/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1064 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
