D3
v 5mk2
first pictures from the mk2 look really good,maybe a stop better than the d3?
gwgw Member 70 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | Nov 30, 2008 17:50 | #1 D3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Nov 30, 2008 18:28 | #2 I have not seen much in the way of detailed comparison. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Nov 30, 2008 18:33 | #3 gwgw wrote in post #6786859 maybe a stop better than the d3? Mmmm, I don't think I would count on that. We would be lucky if the 5D MKII was on par with the high ISO capabilities of the D3, let alone exceed it. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Nov 30, 2008 18:34 | #4 And FWIW, the D3 & D700 are the same in regards to sensor & processing, and there have been a few comparisons between the 5D MKII & D700. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DigitalSpecialist Goldmember 2,286 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2008 Location: Finding a New World, thru my camera More info | Nov 30, 2008 18:37 | #5 The production camera is still to new to see quality photos from yet. Give it a month or so! JIM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Markitos Goldmember 1,615 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Durham, NC More info | Nov 30, 2008 18:38 | #6 Um, the 5DmkII just started shipping, like this week--It'll be a little while before there are ANY comparisons. You can compare some early photos, but until real photographers get the camera in their hands, have a chance to use it in the real world, have a chance to use it against other cameras in the real world, it's mostly just baseless or speculation based on a few images. |Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Panopeeper Senior Member 774 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:19 | #7 gwgw wrote in post #6786859 maybe a stop better than the d3? LOL, this is good. I'm not sure if you understand the meaning of "a stop better". Gabor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:27 | #8 Just too early to tell. We need to give people time to sit down and do proper comparisons. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:28 | #9 There would be no point in comparing the D3 to the 5D II because the D700 is much closer to the 5D II in overall numbers (burst mode, etc.) than the D3 is, and is priced similarly. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Markitos Goldmember 1,615 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Durham, NC More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:30 | #10 form wrote in post #6787430 There would be no point in comparing the D3 to the 5D II because the D700 is much closer to the 5D II in overall numbers (burst mode, etc.) than the D3 is, and is priced similarly. Yeah, but Canon and Nikon are more divergent at this point than usual--the D700 and 5DmkII are aimed at different types of shooters, IMO. The D700 is much more the low light, tough, do everything camera where the 5D is more the studio/landscape/portrait/wedding camera. Nikon and Canon almost never compete directly, but these two seem more different than past offerings. |Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:36 | #11 [QUOTE=JeffreyG;6787074]I have not seen much in the way of detailed comparison.[/quote] http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bacchanal Cream of the Crop 5,284 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Fort Wayne, IN More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:40 | #12 form wrote in post #6787430 There would be no point in comparing the D3 to the 5D II because the D700 is much closer to the 5D II in overall numbers (burst mode, etc.) than the D3 is, and is priced similarly. Um...the D3 and D700 use the same sensor.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PerryGe Batteries? We don't need no... . . . or cards. More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:51 | #13 ed rader wrote in post #6787497 i thought this was excellent...and about as detailed as i care for .i love how he handles the sounds of the different shutters .http://forums.dpreview.com …rum=1032&message=30174503 edit: ooops i took D3 to mean 1d3. i musta forgot where i was for a second . still it's a good review and tells me what i wanted to know.ed rader HAHA this made me laugh: Perry | www.perryge.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bacchanal Cream of the Crop 5,284 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Fort Wayne, IN More info | Nov 30, 2008 19:56 | #14 perryge wrote in post #6787596 HAHA this made me laugh: "The sound is a litte nicer than the one of the 5D- It's more a "zacka" than the 5D "bommba". But it is not louder than 5D and still lower the "zideng" of 1DsM3 (which I love). I think I feel a tensed spring in the camera body when pressing the button." Omg, best review ever
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wallybud Taking the "Walk of Shame" 2,980 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Buffalo, NY More info | Nov 30, 2008 20:08 | #15 Hahah^^ -Walt-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1662 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||