Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 22 Jul 2001 (Sunday) 00:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Picture taken at the beach

 
gbjune
Member
47 posts
Joined Jun 2001
     
Jul 22, 2001 00:22 |  #1

The Oregon coast might not have nice water, but sometimes it's fun to just bring a camera and walk around...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Although, thanks to Canon's brilliant engineering, they put Auto for ISO since that was what the camera was set to. I'd be a bit happier if they set the EXIF information to whatever the picture actually ended up being taken at...

I had to go through and modify the sky, since noise in the blue was horrible. Not sure why...

Geir



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpkirby
Member
118 posts
Joined Jun 2001
     
Jul 24, 2001 06:17 |  #2

This is pretty cool. Its got the "what's on the other side of the sand-dune" motif.

I wonder what it would look like in black & white? I think if you layed a piece of drift-wood across the path and printed it in B&W, you would have a famous photograph. (can't remember the photographer though....old age).

Try shooting it in Raw, instead of auto. The noise you were seeing might be JPEG artifacts. I use RAW exclusively now, and have pretty good deep blue skys. A little bit of noise, but you have to go hunting for it.

Mike




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deeps
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined May 2001
     
Jul 24, 2001 10:09 |  #3

Geir,
I like the composition. May be if this was shot at dawn or dusk, with the reeds a golden hue,the impact would be even greater. Just a thought.

Mike,
Here's one I shot a while ago...

http://randomtrips.com​/photos/index.html?id=​3 (external link)

Think I have a famous photo? :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gbjune
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Joined Jun 2001
     
Jul 24, 2001 10:28 |  #4

mpkirby wrote:
Try shooting it in Raw, instead of auto. The noise you were seeing might be JPEG artifacts. I use RAW exclusively now, and have pretty good deep blue skys. A little bit of noise, but you have to go hunting for it.
Mike

I did use RAW, that's part of the problem...

Even with RAW mode, the blue sky was speckled with red noise. It was really bad...

Then again, when watching on a 1280x1024/19" monitor, the picture is blown up substantially compared to a 6x4 or anything like that...

I'll try again this weekend, this time make sure it is ISO 50 and do some bracketing. See if that helps.

:)

converted to black and white (and did nothing to reduce noise)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Geir



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Paul ­ V
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Jul 2001
     
Jul 24, 2001 12:42 |  #5

I don't see any noise in this B&W photo...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gbjune
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Joined Jun 2001
     
Jul 24, 2001 13:27 |  #6

Paul V wrote:
I don't see any noise in this B&W photo...

The noise seems to dissappear as part of the B&W conversion....

which I guess is good... Blue and red look similar in grey anyway, so this is to be expected...

Geir




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Smith
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jul 2001
     
Jul 25, 2001 06:19 |  #7

Great color management here. Congratulations.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpkirby
Member
118 posts
Joined Jun 2001
     
Jul 27, 2001 16:23 |  #8

> Mike,
> Here's one I shot a while ago...
>
> http://www.geocities.c​om …lvakumar/photos​.html?id=3 (external link)
>
> Think I have a famous photo? :-)


That's it!! That's the "look" I was thinking of.

A little sadness, end-of-summer kind of day. Everyone's gone but you. You're only left with memories.

The B&W looks good too. Did you just take the standard conversion? Or did you futz around with it. I like the contrast better than the B&W version above. The composition is good too. (notice, the destination is in the upper-left, not dead center...) Its kind of like you'r walking while looking at the ground. (sort of like most of us walk :-)

Mike




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,226 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Picture taken at the beach
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1319 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.