Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Dec 2008 (Friday) 19:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

28-135mm or 17-85mm?

 
kjclockplay
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 05, 2008 19:55 |  #1

I'd like to get a new lens for my Canon XTI. I need a overall good lens but I really would like one that does well with portraits. I was planning on getting a 50mm but also a 28-135mm or a 17-85mm lens. I just don't know which one would be better in my situation. what are some of your opinions?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
5,175 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Jun 2005
Location: san jose
     
Dec 05, 2008 20:27 |  #2

Do you find yourself shooting more at wide length or at long length?

I shot with both and I think they are pretty good. The 17-85 maybe just a little bit better but not much. You'll be happy with either as a good walk around.

If you use it on 1.6x crop, the 28-135 maybe too long at wide end but it's great at the long end.


Sonny
website (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjclockplay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 05, 2008 20:33 |  #3

I'd like to shoot at wide length more. But what if I got a 50mm on top of one of the others, would it be better to get the 28-135 or the 17-85? Or does it still depend if I want length or width?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MLphoto
Goldmember
1,469 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Dec 05, 2008 20:36 |  #4

if you want to shoot on the wide side more then the 17-85mm is for you... I recenty sold my XTi and 17-85mm, the lens did a good job but it was pretty soft. I tested a few 28-135mm lenses and they are pretty sharp and they are cheaper then the 17-85mm as well. BTW the 17-85 starts at f/4 the 28 starts at f/3.5

I want the 28-135 becuase it will be a good everyday lens for me and the 135mm zoom will be nice.


http://flickr.com/marc​el-lech-photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KayakPhotos
Goldmember
Avatar
3,385 posts
Gallery: 180 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2528
Joined May 2008
Location: Bluffton, SC
     
Dec 05, 2008 20:37 as a reply to  @ kjclockplay's post |  #5

If you're looking for a one lens solution and need wide, then the 17-85mm is a better choice. I have heard that it has problems with CA on the wide end though if I remember correctly...

Maybe consider a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 also. It sells for around $300-350 used and has a larger constant aperture (f/2.8 vs. f/4 or f/3.5) and better quality optics than either of the Canon lenses you mentioned. It lacks IS, but that should not be a big deal at this focal length.


Just a thought from Daniel
Gear
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jason ­ C
do I need to submit a resume...?
4,922 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 2005
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Calabasas, CA
     
Dec 06, 2008 00:50 |  #6

The 17-85 has considerable barrel distortion at the wide end. This lens has very good center sharpness, however, the edges get a bit soft.

Nevertheless, my 17-85 has taken some very nice pictures and I am glad I chose it as my first lens.


Equipment & Feedback
"I am not interested in shooting new things-I am interested to see things new"--Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Dec 06, 2008 02:01 |  #7

The 17-85 is designed for your camera format. It's the little brother of the 28-135. It's designed to give you the same view if you are switching from a film camera to a 1.6 crop so you have a very familiar field of view. And for good reason... the 28-135 was a very popular lens for enthusiasts in the EOS film SLR days.

So basically, I would recommend the 17-85 as it's designed and optimized for your camera. I had one and really enjoyed using it. It has great range and the image quality was nice enough for me.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,006 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
28-135mm or 17-85mm?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2855 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.