http://www.the-digital-picture.com …E-Planar-Lens-Review.aspx![]()
Not a very impressive review of this lens. There was problem with the first copy he received.
newbiephotographer Member 122 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: California More info | Dec 07, 2008 19:04 | #1 http://www.the-digital-picture.com …E-Planar-Lens-Review.aspx
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments More info | Dec 07, 2008 19:53 | #2 I noticed the shot comparisons; looked terrible. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2008 20:18 | #3 For a lens that expensive and well constructed, you would think the QC could be better. This is disappointing indeed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
quickben Fairy Gapped More info | Disappointing indeed. However, I would reserve judgement until he has had a chance to test another lens. Plus, manual focusing correctly AND consistantly is HARD. Different people may get considerably different results. Fighting the war against the unnecessary use of the Book Worthy Smiley
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments More info | Dec 08, 2008 18:40 | #5 I'm confident that something was wrong with his copy there -- I've been watching for Zeiss in an EF mount for a while, drooling over the IQ...... Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 08, 2008 22:11 | #6 more sample pics:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jr_senator Goldmember 4,861 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Dec 08, 2008 23:46 | #7 Reviewing a manual focus lens without a focusing aid is not a good review.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 907 guests, 146 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||