Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 Dec 2008 (Tuesday) 17:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Backfocusing? Need second opinion!

 
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Dec 10, 2008 15:06 |  #16

photoguy6405 wrote in post #6851298 (external link)
Thanks for the answers. I learned something new today. Now I can go back to bed. :lol:

Anyway, sometimes I have issues with focusing close-up and have always blown it off as me and my eyes. Are these focusing charts easy to obtain?

Regarding close-ups: be careful that you don't get too close, because the camera won't be able to deliver sharp images anymore when you are closer than MFD.

Focusing charts are very easy to obtain.
Here is the one that everybody uses: http://focustestchart.​com/chart.html (external link)
Another method of testing AF: http://www.komar.org/f​aq/camera/auto-focus-test/ (external link)

Generally, test charts for testing lens sharpness need to be bought. Here are a few:
http://www.aig-imaging.com/mm5/mercha​nt.mvc (external link)

One for free: http://www.graphics.co​rnell.edu/~westin/misc​/res-chart.html (external link)

Article on lens testing: http://www.sciencebudd​ies.org …hoto_p001.shtml​?from=Home (external link)

Some theoretical stuff on lenses:
http://photo.net/learn​/optics/lensTutorial (external link)

Anyway, HTH, kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
strobe ­ monkey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,557 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 173
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
     
Dec 10, 2008 15:41 |  #17

A better and easier test will be the battery test.
focus point is the middle battery

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3255/3087840122_940b5637fa.jpg?v=0

or my Stanley test:
focus point is the no.40
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3252/3014034322_034c4f73d0.jpg?v=0

R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Dec 10, 2008 17:25 |  #18

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #6852086 (external link)
"Focusing Close Up" .. Maybe you're up against the MFD (minimum focus distance) for the lens in question?

I do do that on occasion, and increase the distance accordingly. That aspect I'm aware of when it happens.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lvph2
Goldmember
1,909 posts
Likes: 186
Joined Jul 2005
     
Dec 11, 2008 15:13 |  #19

Hi everyone. Thanks for the info. I'm the one who sold him the 85mm. I never had a problem with it, but I never tested it. Once I get it back I'll do some tests of my own and check the warranty status.



- Nikon D3300
- Nikon 35mm F/1.8
- Sigma 17-70mm F/2.8-4 Cont.
- Tokina 100mm F/2.8 MACRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Dec 11, 2008 15:17 |  #20

speedy_2 wrote in post #6859314 (external link)
Hi everyone. Thanks for the info. I'm the one who sold him the 85mm. I never had a problem with it, but I never tested it. Once I get it back I'll do some tests of my own and check the warranty status.

Good on you for stepping up and wanting to work it out... :)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ef2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,135 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Dec 11, 2008 17:20 |  #21

Everything's on the way back to their respective owners. Thanks speedy


5D Mk III
Canon 580EX
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24mm f/3.5L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm f/2.0 | 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 135mm f/2.8 SF | 70-200mm [COLOR=black]f/2.8L IS | 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amamba
Goldmember
Avatar
3,685 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Nov 2007
Location: SE MI
     
Dec 11, 2008 17:53 |  #22

nightcat wrote in post #6849452 (external link)
This is usually a lens problem, not a camera problem. Is this a Canon lens? Is it still under warantee? If so, send it in for adjustment.

In my case this was a camera problem, luckily I discovered it quickly after buying and Canon calibrated it for $15 shipping (guess I didn't **** enough or it would be free shipping both ways).

I used the same test, and another one - basically a modified battery test, that I do after I run this chart test. I take a sheet of paper with sharp black on white text, cut three little tabs about 1.5" long and 3/4" wide, then glue each to a battery (or anything you can stand upright). This way the text is crisper than what you get on a battery, and the flash doesn't cause as much glare. I position batteries and camera on the same table, and shoot away.

If both tests show back or front focusing you know you have a problem.


Ex-Canon shooter. Now Sony Nex.
Life Lessons: KISS. RTFM. Don't sweat the small stuff.
My Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lvph2
Goldmember
1,909 posts
Likes: 186
Joined Jul 2005
     
Dec 12, 2008 15:54 |  #23

ef2 wrote in post #6860111 (external link)
Everything's on the way back to their respective owners. Thanks speedy

Thanks again.

Luckily, I'm pretty sure it is still under warranty. So if it does test out bad with me, it'll be on it's way to Canon soon after. If you still want to trade after I get it resolved, let me know!!!!



- Nikon D3300
- Nikon 35mm F/1.8
- Sigma 17-70mm F/2.8-4 Cont.
- Tokina 100mm F/2.8 MACRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lvph2
Goldmember
1,909 posts
Likes: 186
Joined Jul 2005
     
Dec 13, 2008 12:41 |  #24

Ok. Got the lens today and did a test. Both on my few year old XT @ f/1.8

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


The focus chart doesn't look anything like your 5d Test. I don't know. The tape measure does seem to show it focusing more at 15 1/2 inches rather than the 16 I focused on. You guys think I should send it off??


- Nikon D3300
- Nikon 35mm F/1.8
- Sigma 17-70mm F/2.8-4 Cont.
- Tokina 100mm F/2.8 MACRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ef2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,135 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Dec 13, 2008 20:52 |  #25

Your sample resembles my test with the XT. Focus seems alot better than my 1D, 1Ds, and 5D.


5D Mk III
Canon 580EX
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24mm f/3.5L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm f/2.0 | 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 135mm f/2.8 SF | 70-200mm [COLOR=black]f/2.8L IS | 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcogger
Goldmember
2,554 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Dec 14, 2008 07:24 |  #26

speedy_2 wrote in post #6871177 (external link)
Ok. Got the lens today and did a test. Both on my few year old XT @ f/1.8

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO


The focus chart doesn't look anything like your 5d Test. I don't know. The tape measure does seem to show it focusing more at 15 1/2 inches rather than the 16 I focused on. You guys think I should send it off??

The focus test chart looks OK to me. The tape measure test proves nothing, I'm afraid. You really need an unambiguous single thing to focus on at the focus point. With your tape measure test the camera can quite legitimately choose to focus on anything in it's 'target area', and this extends considerably beyond the box around the focus point in the viewfinder.


Graeme
My galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pilot ­ Dane
Member
165 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Roxboro, NC
     
Dec 14, 2008 07:57 |  #27

gcogger wrote in post #6875378 (external link)
The focus test chart looks OK to me. The tape measure test proves nothing, I'm afraid. You really need an unambiguous single thing to focus on at the focus point. With your tape measure test the camera can quite legitimately choose to focus on anything in it's 'target area', and this extends considerably beyond the box around the focus point in the viewfinder.

I'm new but have never heard that. Are you saying that even with the one center focus point selected that the camera is still using the other focus points (boxes) or that the focus sensors actually extend beyond the edge of the box?


50D, 24-105L, 100-400L, EF-S 17-55, 430EX, Gitzo GM5561T monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Dec 14, 2008 08:52 |  #28

Pilot Dane wrote in post #6875471 (external link)
I'm new but have never heard that. Are you saying that even with the one center focus point selected that the camera is still using the other focus points (boxes) or that the focus sensors actually extend beyond the edge of the box?

Most cameras have sensors that do extend slightly outside of the boxes..... Particullary the centre point

This image sorta shows what I am trying to say....
http://img.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E40​D/ZAFSENSORS.JPG (external link)
(you have to click then refresh as I don't think they want direct embedding or whatever)


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcogger
Goldmember
2,554 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Dec 14, 2008 13:30 |  #29

Pilot Dane wrote in post #6875471 (external link)
I'm new but have never heard that. Are you saying that even with the one center focus point selected that the camera is still using the other focus points (boxes) or that the focus sensors actually extend beyond the edge of the box?

The sensitive area for a focus 'point' extends well outside the box. Here's an example of the areas covered (shown in red) for the older 7-point system, although the principle is the same on the newer ones.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


(This may be the same thing pendulum15 was trying to link to, but I can't get the image to show on that link).

Graeme
My galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tigerotor77w
Goldmember
1,564 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 52
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Allgäu, BY, Germany
     
Dec 14, 2008 19:29 |  #30

strobe monkey wrote in post #6852806 (external link)
A better and easier test will be the battery test.
QUOTED IMAGE

or my Stanley test:
QUOTED IMAGE

How do you know if it's the lens that is at fault or the body? (Apart from trying the suspect lenses on another body and the suspect body with other lenses...)


Photo blog (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,111 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Backfocusing? Need second opinion!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1040 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.