Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Dec 2008 (Thursday) 12:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma DIligma - 17-70, 24-70 ...

 
brecklundin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,179 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 14, 2008 15:46 |  #16

Brudda Mario,

I think you went the right way. I know the 24-60 (which I have) is not near wide enough at times. But I have the 10-20 to use at those times. So getting the 18-50 is a key buy for now...and nothing is gonna be near as wide as your old FF rig...but soon as you get that back in your bag you'll like having that 18-50...btw, did you get the macro or non-macro version? From reading and looking at shots I don't see a lot of IQ difference between them. I suspect the odds are you are not gonna need to get 6" away from your subject...then again rumor has it you might need to be a tad...closer....snicke​rsnickersnicker.... :evil:


Real men shoot Pentax because we're born with our own Canon's!!
{Ok...ok, some of use just have a PnS but it it always makes me happy! :D}
Pentax K5, K20D, Three Amigos (Pentax FA 31/1.8 Limited Silver, Pentax FA 43/1.9 Limited Silver, Pentax FA 77/1.8 Limited Silver), Pentax DA 35mm F2.8 Macro Limited, Sigma 24-60/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoJourno
THREAD ­ STARTER
High Plains Chimper
Avatar
5,681 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Lago, CA
     
Dec 15, 2008 00:24 |  #17

brecklundin wrote in post #6877679 (external link)
Brudda Mario,

I think you went the right way. I know the 24-60 (which I have) is not near wide enough at times. But I have the 10-20 to use at those times. So getting the 18-50 is a key buy for now...and nothing is gonna be near as wide as your old FF rig...but soon as you get that back in your bag you'll like having that 18-50...btw, did you get the macro or non-macro version? From reading and looking at shots I don't see a lot of IQ difference between them. I suspect the odds are you are not gonna need to get 6" away from your subject...then again rumor has it you might need to be a tad...closer....snicke​rsnickersnicker.... :evil:

Hey Rob,

This was the Macro version. And it worked beautifully. This is in fact a lens that will stay with me forever. I am working on something like

18-50
50 (1.4?)
70-200

That is all I need. I was able to snap some shots with unparalleled quality, and take portrait photos at 50mm 2.8 which came out perfectly. I will have to post a photo or two, but I am very glad I chose this lens.

It fixed both the "Wide Angle" problem, as well as the "Wide Aperture" all the way across.


--Mario
"Sensa luce non si vede nessuna cosa"--Lorenzo Ghiberti

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Dec 15, 2008 00:52 |  #18

The 18-50EX Macro is a great lens. My copy is very sharp wideopen and I NEVER get the irritating change of aperature as I change focal lengths since its a costant f/2.8.

I was testing my brothers Sigma 17-70 and it worked great but it'll annoy you if your trying to do some creative f/2.8 photos and the aperature changes on you.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,378 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Sigma DIligma - 17-70, 24-70 ...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1041 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.