i have made note of all of these, i didnt get to buying a lense on this trip unfortuantly, i was too busy buying xmas presents for everyone else 
no presents for me!
Mathiau THREAD STARTER Goldmember  1,514 posts Gallery: 16 photos Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2006 Location: Born in London, England living in Calgary, AB More info | Dec 15, 2008 17:51 | #16 i have made note of all of these, i didnt get to buying a lense on this trip unfortuantly, i was too busy buying xmas presents for everyone else Currently Dreaming about what gear to own in the near future
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Misiek Senior Member 682 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Poland More info | Dec 15, 2008 18:04 | #17 If you're not into taking pics of birds I would go with 135 2.0. It's a superb lens Canon 5d1, 5d2, 35L, 85
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beepclick Goldmember  1,850 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Dec 15, 2008 19:05 | #19 Mathiau wrote in post #6866937  well, it is that time of year again! X-mas bonus time and i am in toronto! so it turns out i may have damagethe prism in my 40D from a nice hit, so using the eye piece is blurry but pics come out fine, and i use live view anyways %90 of the time. what do i own right now...
i am looking for a new lense to add to my collection..... but i am unsure, i would like to get a nice telephoto, however i would also like a nice fisheye / wide angle lense.... my 17-85 IS does me well, i know it is not the best! but i do enjoy it, my uncle just got a new Sigma 17-300 lense, and it seems pretty well made and can take some good pics.... Any thoughts? price is not so much an issue but i also dont want to spend my entire bonus. i was considering the Lseries 70-200 for about $1200... but not sure if i need that much quality?? i dont know... help clear my mind! i am in toronto so prices are CAD. Sounds like you want something a little wider. I have the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 and like it. The Canon 10-22 is viewed very favorably around here. Sigma makes one also. Gear https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=635450
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember  More info | Dec 15, 2008 19:54 | #20 How about a really nice Tamron 18-270mm VC??
The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1205 guests, 183 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
