Taken with a Canon ELPH SD1100. Horrid. Never realized how crappy typical p&s's were, until I got a real camera. I PS'd the Hell out of this. I would have taken the shot with the T3 that I want to get rid of, but that would require taking it out of the box etc...  To be fair, this SD1100 is far superior to the SD100 that I paid $450 for back in 2001. And, I got it free from work to boot. So, won't complain too much.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crazy_Guitar Senior Member  616 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Braga, PT More info | Jul 10, 2011 19:55 | #6377 Headshotzx wrote in post #12732408  Haha it's nothing much to wow about really. Just the basic in all departments (Viewfinder, Recorder, Microphone, Follow Focus, Baseplate, Video head). Nothing basic about the 5D2 + 35L combo! 50D | 1000D | 30V | 17-40L | 18-55 USM | 24-105L | 28 2.8 | 50 1.8 II | 70-300 IS | 580EX II | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nomofica Senior Member 509 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Edmonton, Alberta More info | Just got home from a failed shoot thanks to the weather. This is a common sight in my hands. If not the 100-400L, it's the 15-85, 10-22 or the 50 1.8. I'll get around to taking a shot of both my cameras (7D and backup XSi) with the lenses. Too lazy right now.
Taken with the XSi. just threw a 430EXII on top to fill; didn't care too much what it looked like. SOOC, resized.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2011 05:46 | #6379 Nomofica wrote in post #12737998 Just got home from a failed shoot thanks to the weather. This is a common sight in my hands. If not the 100-400L, it's the 15-85, 10-22 or the 50 1.8. I'll get around to taking a shot of both my cameras (7D and backup XSi) with the lenses. Too lazy right now.
Taken with the XSi. just threw a 430EXII on top to fill; didn't care too much what it looked like. SOOC, resized. I'm not even going to criticize your laziness in pp, on this shot. I just want to drool all over that lens...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jul 11, 2011 07:00 | #6380 LowriderS10 wrote in post #12723545 Sorry, some of us have to decide between getting a better version of a lens I never used to use (I'm a wide zooms rather than a medium prime kinda person) or food in our bellies... Although lately I've been using the Nifty Fifty quite a bit, so I think it's time to replace it with something a little more respectable haha I was kidding of course.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nomofica Senior Member 509 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Edmonton, Alberta More info | Jul 11, 2011 07:09 | #6381 Str0ntium wrote in post #12738009 I'm not even going to criticize your laziness in pp, on this shot. I just want to drool all over that lens... Haha, it is an awesome lens. She gets heavy after a while though. To be perfectly honest I'm not a huge fan of the push/pull zoom, but I presume if Canon hadn't designed it this way the lens would a) be much bigger, b) be much heavier, and c) be much more expensive than the current MRSP of ~$1,600.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2011 07:20 | #6382 Nomofica wrote in post #12738229 Haha, it is an awesome lens. She gets heavy after a while though. To be perfectly honest I'm not a huge fan of the push/pull zoom, but I presume if Canon hadn't designed it this way the lens would a) be much bigger, b) be much heavier, and c) be much more expensive than the current MRSP of ~$1,600. I wouldn't mind lugging it around, to be honest. Just knowing I could get a good candid shot from 100 or so meters would be incentive enough for me haha.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nomofica Senior Member 509 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Edmonton, Alberta More info | Jul 11, 2011 07:27 | #6383 Str0ntium wrote in post #12738260 I wouldn't mind lugging it around, to be honest. Just knowing I could get a good candid shot from 100 or so meters would be incentive enough for me haha. I've never studied optics, but I'm pretty sure that the lens can't be made much smaller yet. If that technology existed (not sure it ever will since they rely on big giant pieces of magnifying glass?). I'm sure the wide aperture has a lot to do with that. Not sure the physics of it will ever change. /looks around for ~$1600 laying around...  I usually don't mind lugging it around either.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crazy_Guitar Senior Member 616 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Braga, PT More info | Jul 11, 2011 08:05 | #6384 Str0ntium wrote in post #12738009 I'm not even going to criticize your laziness in pp, on this shot. I just want to drool all over that lens... Good thing that combo is drool-proof too! 50D | 1000D | 30V | 17-40L | 18-55 USM | 24-105L | 28 2.8 | 50 1.8 II | 70-300 IS | 580EX II | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2011 08:48 | #6385 It is... Sadly, because I'll probably never be close enough to one to actually drool on it hahahaha!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
oweng Member 106 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 More info | Had a tidy up yesterday so thought I'd grab a pic with my iPhone (dim light) but couldn't include the 24-70L as it only came back today and I forgot to add my old eos 5. Couldn't be bothered to include any accessories. I think I have too much gear  
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2011 11:17 | #6387 oweng wrote in post #12739364 Had a tidy up yesterday so thought I'd grab a pic with my iPhone (dim light) but couldn't include the 24-70L as it only came back today and I forgot to add my old eos 5. Couldn't be bothered to include any accessories. I think I have too much gear  I agree. You have too much gear. I'll take the first row of lenses and the last two slr's in the back of the left column.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
appsyscons Senior Member  563 posts Likes: 23 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Port Charlotte, FL More info | Jul 11, 2011 11:21 | #6388 oweng wrote in post #12739364 Had a tidy up yesterday so thought I'd grab a pic with my iPhone (dim light) but couldn't include the 24-70L as it only came back today and I forgot to add my old eos 5. Couldn't be bothered to include any accessories. I think I have too much gear Str0ntium wrote in post #12739384 I agree. You have too much gear. I'll take the first row of lenses and the last two slr's in the back of the left column. Thanks, in advance. And I am more that happy to help you out by taking the back row of lenses LOL Gear: 7D gripped | EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | EF-S 10-18mm | , Nikon P530, Manfrotto legs, 496RC2 Ball Head /QR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crazy_Guitar Senior Member 616 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Braga, PT More info | Jul 11, 2011 11:25 | #6389 Str0ntium wrote in post #12738550 It is... Sadly, because I'll probably never be close enough to one to actually drool on it hahahaha! Well... I've tested a 100-400L on my 50D. Does that count? 50D | 1000D | 30V | 17-40L | 18-55 USM | 24-105L | 28 2.8 | 50 1.8 II | 70-300 IS | 580EX II | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jpbimages Senior Member  474 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Greenville, Sc More info | Jul 11, 2011 11:41 | #6390 oweng wrote in post #12739364 Had a tidy up yesterday so thought I'd grab a pic with my iPhone (dim light) but couldn't include the 24-70L as it only came back today and I forgot to add my old eos 5. Couldn't be bothered to include any accessories. I think I have too much gear If you're feeling generous.... I can always PM my address ;-P Hahaha
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2189 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
