Just curious about the outcome ...
| POLL: "SIGMA 30 f/1.4 - Your Experience?" |
Mine was perfect right out of the box | 73 42.7% |
Mine had to be calibrated multiple times before it became perfect | 4 2.3% |
Mine had to be calibrated only once | 6 3.5% |
I owned one (or more) but it never worked properly for me so I got rid of it | 16 9.4% |
I don’t own one, but I’m considering buying it | 58 33.9% |
I would never buy one, don't need the headache | 14 8.2% |
pixel_junkie Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info | Dec 13, 2008 12:33 | #1 |
Emergenic Member 143 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Planet Earth More info | Dec 13, 2008 12:55 | #2 Just got my second copy in a EF mount, the first one was on Zuiko mount. Perfect so far, so glad I got it again...Hmmm I guess I'm just lucky with the 30's Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chris78cpr Senior Member 586 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: London - UK More info | I have always fancied a Canon 35F1.4 but the cost has kept me from jumping on it, i am happy with my sigma 20F1.8 so i might pick one of these up to see if it can tide me over until the canon one is within my reach. Canon 5dmkii | 7d | Canon 1dmkii | Canon 400D | Canon 10D | Canon 1VHS | Canon Eos 3 | 17-40F4L | 24-105F4LIS | 70-200F2.8LIS | 100-400LIS | 15F2.8 | 20F1.8EX | 50F1.4 | 85F1.8 | 100F2.8 Macro | 2 x 550EX | 1.4xII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mwolfe Member 79 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA More info | Dec 13, 2008 12:58 | #4 Plan to buy one very soon. The QC/calibration issues are what have had me on the fence.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jman13 Cream of the Crop 5,567 posts Likes: 164 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Dec 13, 2008 13:33 | #5 I voted for the multiple times, even though mine was only calibrated once. I have owned 3 of them. The first two front focused so horribly the lens was unusable. My third one had a very mild backfocus problem that was fixed upon a single calibration. Now that I have a spot on one, though, it's extremely good. Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dann6968 Member 100 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Dec 13, 2008 13:34 | #6 I would not buy one and it has nothing to do with avoiding a headache. Vancouver BC,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mutombo Member 240 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: San Francisco More info | Dec 13, 2008 13:48 | #7 I don't own one but I'm looking to buy one. I'm either going to buy new from a local store or try to find a used one with no focusing issues so I don't have to worry about all the problems I've read about.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sebr Goldmember 4,628 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sweden/France More info | Dec 13, 2008 14:09 | #8 I don't own one and I am not considering buying one soon. Until now, I have been put off by the focusing issues this lens seem to have. I hope the micro-adjustment on newer cameras (like the 50D) will solve this problem. Does anyone have any experience with that? Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixel_junkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info | Dec 13, 2008 14:42 | #9 sebr wrote in post #6871565 I don't own one and I am not considering buying one soon. Until now, I have been put off by the focusing issues this lens seem to have. I hope the micro-adjustment on newer cameras (like the 50D) will solve this problem. Does anyone have any experience with that? PJ, does this poll mean that you are considering trading your 35L ? No, not really. I don't remember seeing a poll like this one so I was just curious what the outcome would be. I went through my share of SIGMA 30s and unfortunately it didn't work out for me. It is unfortunate because IQ alone, I can't justify the price difference (SIGMA 30 vs. 35L), the SIGMA is very very good in that regard. Same with build quality. I own the 35L for the better MFD and AF accuracy mainly. I paid about half of what the 35L sells at B&H so I didn't mind paying a little more for AF and MFD. If a SIGMA 30 Mark II comes out though and those two things above are improved, I'll be the first in line, trust me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TaDa ...as cool as Perry 6,742 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: New York More info | Dec 13, 2008 15:07 | #10 My copy back focused when I first got it. I drove it out to Sigma on Long Island. They calibrated it while I ran to Starbucks (half hour). Focus was spot on, but noticed after I got home, that if they focus went to infinity, it would never come back down without my manually turning the focus ring. Took back to Long Island. They had to replace the AF motor. That was a day or so to fix, so they overnighted it back to me. Threw it on my camera, and it front focused like crazy. Drove back out to Long Island and they re-calibrated it again. Then it was perfect. So 3 total trips back to Sigma. Name is Peter and here is my gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixel_junkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info | Dec 13, 2008 15:57 | #11 TaDa wrote in post #6871790 My copy back focused when I first got it. I drove it out to Sigma on Long Island. They calibrated it while I ran to Starbucks (half hour). Focus was spot on, but noticed after I got home, that if they focus went to infinity, it would never come back down without my manually turning the focus ring. Took back to Long Island. They had to replace the AF motor. That was a day or so to fix, so they overnighted it back to me. Threw it on my camera, and it front focused like crazy. Drove back out to Long Island and they re-calibrated it again. Then it was perfect. So 3 total trips back to Sigma. Looks like you sold it after all the trouble ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TaDa ...as cool as Perry 6,742 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: New York More info | Dec 13, 2008 16:03 | #12 Purely because of the move to full-frame. I will probably snag a 50mm 1.4 when my cashback comes in. I miss having a fast prime in that focal range. Name is Peter and here is my gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi 9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | Dec 13, 2008 16:05 | #13 Calibrated once, in Sept of 2005, IIRC. Since then, it's been one of the best lenses I've used to date. Won't sell it so long as I have APS-C.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi 9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | As of note, a fellow photog locally asked me to test out his Sigma 30 that just returned from Sigma NY for calibration. Not good, here is his copy, f1.4 about 15-20 feet distance:
And here's my copy:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TaDa ...as cool as Perry 6,742 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: New York More info | Dec 13, 2008 16:42 | #15 How much did your kid have to pay for that view JoJo? Name is Peter and here is my gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 653 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||