Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 15 Dec 2008 (Monday) 07:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Invisible Shield vs Box Wave Crystal Clear LCD Film

 
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,386 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Dec 15, 2008 07:55 |  #1

I know the debate over LCD protection, clear film vs. nothing over the LCD.
However, being of Greek and Albanian ancestry, the film does a better with oils from the nose and face.
Has anyone tried either one of these with the clarity being the main issue.
I have the Boxwave on my XTi and the Invisible Shield on my 40D.
I know the LCD is not the best on the 40D as they kept the same as XTi.
Just thought I would ask.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digibeginner
Member
76 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Dec 15, 2008 09:44 |  #2

I like to use those hard screen protectors, I find them clearer and easier to put on and take off. It sure takes the fear out of scratching the LCD (yes, I know that it is already a LCD protector and can be replaced easily) with any cloth handy at the time.


There is always more glass. :wink:
My Gears
Lee

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OC ­ Photoguy
Member
Avatar
245 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 30, 2009 16:25 |  #3

Which one is clearer? The boxwave? I used invisible shield on my Ipod a long time ago and it had a orange peel look. I have used other brands on my Ipod and they look much nicer.


Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 40D, Canon G7
Canon 50mm f/1.4, 17-40mm f/4 L
[COLOR=blue]Canon 24-105mm f/4 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Apr 30, 2009 16:37 |  #4

I don't understand the logic of protecting the protector?


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
colbyb25
Senior Member
Avatar
676 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
     
Apr 30, 2009 21:08 |  #5

I have an invisible shield on both my pro cameras, 5D Mark II and 1D Mark III, that cover all screens on each camera. I do a lot of adventure/travel photography so anything I can do to help keep my camera in good shape I will. I feel the invisible shield is perfectly clear as it gives me no issues. I highly recommend them to anyone wanting to have a little extra protection.

I don't understand why you wouldn't protect an LCD (even if it is the screen cover). You telling me it isnt worth 20 bucks to get an LCD cover that would take the brunt of hard scratch rather then scratching the "protector" and then having to send it in to replace it? Can't me out on that.

I am in rugged terrain all the time so that extra layer gives me a piece of mind. They are on my ipod and iphone as well so maybe I am biased...


COLBY BROWN PHOTOGRAPHY (external link) -WORKSHOPS - (external link)GOOGLE+ - (external link) TWITTER (external link) - FACEBOOK (external link)
"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." ~Marcel Proust

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
May 01, 2009 08:04 |  #6

That's just it - you don't have to send your camera in to replace the Canon LCD cover. You can do it yourself, easily. About as easily as replacing the "protector protector" in fact.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grentz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,874 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Midwest, USA
     
May 01, 2009 08:33 |  #7

I use an antiglare one just to cut down on glare, not for the protection actually.


Search.TechIslands.com (external link) - Photography Shopping Search Engine

www.TechIslands.com (external link) - News and Reviews

My Gear List - 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
May 01, 2009 09:17 |  #8

"You telling me it isnt worth 20 bucks to get an LCD cover....."

Not when I gather Canons own cover costs less and is very simple to replace without sending the camera off on an extended holiday.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,460 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Invisible Shield vs Box Wave Crystal Clear LCD Film
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1474 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.