Shot with these two young aspiring models, sisters 22 (brown top) and 16 years old.
I didn't do any skin smoothing, just a little contrast + sharpening.
Your comments are welcomed.
Thanks
jdouglas003 Senior Member 392 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Desoto, Texas More info | Dec 17, 2008 00:26 | #1 Shot with these two young aspiring models, sisters 22 (brown top) and 16 years old. http://www.movingexposure.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 17, 2008 00:27 | #2 |
jgrussell Looking around nervously 18,758 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2008 Location: NJ USA More info | Dec 17, 2008 00:33 | #3 I like the first one. The perspective seems off in the other two (one sister very much larger than the other). -- jgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 17, 2008 09:14 | #4 jgrussell wrote in post #6893810 I like the first one. The perspective seems off in the other two (one sister very much larger than the other).
http://www.movingexposure.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JamesP Goldmember More info | Dec 17, 2008 09:46 | #5 Nice job with the lighting and DOF. I think they look great. 1Dx - 5DIII - 40D - Canon 24-70LII, 100L macro, 135L, 16-35L, 70-200 f4 and 100-400L lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdmonkey Goldmember 1,819 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2006 Location: Shropshire UK More info | Dec 17, 2008 10:31 | #6 I agree these are great, www.carldavisphoto.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 17, 2008 13:14 | #7 cdmonkey wrote in post #6895863 I agree these are great,
http://www.movingexposure.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SenateDC Senior Member 571 posts Likes: 450 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Dallas, USA More info | Dec 17, 2008 14:10 | #8 The second image of them I like the best where the girl in the brown is in the back. LuskPhoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Luminarex Member 39 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 More info | Dec 17, 2008 14:23 | #9 I personally think the first is the better of the two because it has them together and manages not to show their height difference.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 17, 2008 22:43 | #10 Luminarex wrote in post #6897311 I personally think the first is the better of the two because it has them together and manages not to show their height difference.
http://www.movingexposure.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rascalphoto Senior Member 380 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: S.W. Washington state More info | Dec 18, 2008 12:02 | #11 I like these shots, very well done. But definitely prefer #1. Randy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1568 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||