Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 19 Dec 2008 (Friday) 00:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What do you think about these?

 
jdouglas003
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Desoto, Texas
     
Dec 19, 2008 00:58 |  #1

CC appreciated.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


http://www.movingexpos​ure.com (external link)
Portrait, Event, Sports Phtography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
L.Morey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,571 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto Ca
     
Dec 19, 2008 01:17 |  #2

Very nice


7d gripped,40d gripped,G9,17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8 L, 70-200f2.8 mkll L, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L, 50f1.4 , 85f1.8 , Sigma 24-70f2.8
Sigma 150-500 , Sigma 18-200f4-6.3 , Canon Ste2 , Canon
580mki , Canon 580mkllx2
http://lwmorey.zenfoli​o.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aebrown
Maybe the next victim
Avatar
1,285 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Dec 19, 2008 01:32 |  #3

The first one is alright, the crop seems a little odd to me, she also seems a little tense. I really like the looks to the second one maybe cut a little off of the bottom. Everything else on them seems fine. Great shots!


-Aaron Brown :D
1D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 35L, 85L, 70-200 f/2.8L, 580 EX II
Where to goandWhat to do (external link) in the Pacific Northwest
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benji
Goldmember
2,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North east Indiana
     
Dec 19, 2008 07:47 |  #4

First one, if this is a passport or driver's license image great job. If it is a portrait lets see what should have been done to get rid of that "passport" look. Never ever pose a female with their shoulders square to the camera because it makes them look wide and wide means heavy which usually translates as fat. Does any woman want to look heavy? I have never photographed one in my 26 years as a pro. A 45° turn or the torso looks SOOOOOOOO much better and she looks soooooo much thinner. Do all women want to look thinner? YESSSSSSSSS!!!!!

Benji




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdouglas003
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Desoto, Texas
     
Dec 19, 2008 08:47 |  #5

Benji wrote in post #6908003 (external link)
First one, if this is a passport or driver's license image great job. If it is a portrait lets see what should have been done to get rid of that "passport" look. Never ever pose a female with their shoulders square to the camera because it makes them look wide and wide means heavy which usually translates as fat. Does any woman want to look heavy? I have never photographed one in my 26 years as a pro. A 45° turn or the torso looks SOOOOOOOO much better and she looks soooooo much thinner. Do all women want to look thinner? YESSSSSSSSS!!!!!

Benji

Benji,

I have benefited from many of your posts but I have to disagree with your absolutes. I say never say never.

She was not going for your high school senior or posed portrait look that I generally see from you.

The model really liked this particular pose and she is RAZOR thin so I very seriously doubt that she has any concern about looking heavy.

I do appreciate your comments though.

Thanks


http://www.movingexpos​ure.com (external link)
Portrait, Event, Sports Phtography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notmydog
Member
Avatar
89 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Dec 19, 2008 10:34 |  #6

jdouglas003 wrote in post #6908218 (external link)
Benji,

I have benefited from many of your posts but I have to disagree with your absolutes. I say never say never.

She was not going for your high school senior or posed portrait look that I generally see from you.

The model really liked this particular pose and she is RAZOR thin so I very seriously doubt that she has any concern about looking heavy.

I do appreciate your comments though.

Thanks

I have to admit I agree with Benji on this. The first pose just looks flat to me. Your model has great features (see photo 2) but they don't come out at all in the first shot.

My 2 cents.


http://www.modelmayhem​.com/shadowimagephoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goforphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,067 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Virginia
     
Dec 19, 2008 21:11 |  #7

Image #1
As stated, crop is odd.
Eyes are uneven, models left eye seems to be higher than her right.
Stray hair shadow on her left cheek.
Skin appears slightly splotchy.

Image#2 Still has an odd crop but otherwise a good image


Just another shutterbug.
I am not a photographer, I'm an image capture technician.
Canon 40D - 70-200L f4, 28-135 IS, Nifty Fifty, 70-300 macro, 18-55 420EX Sunpak 266d

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdouglas003
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Desoto, Texas
     
Dec 19, 2008 21:46 as a reply to  @ goforphoto's post |  #8

As stated, crop is odd.
Can someone elaborate a bit on the odd aspects of the crop so that I will know what to look for.

Eyes are uneven, models left eye seems to be higher than her right.
I see this now that you point it out.

Stray hair shadow on her left cheek.
OK, I see that.

Skin appears slightly splotchy.
Her skin was pretty bad. This one thing I was looking to see how well I had done on the skin. You are the only one so far to comment.

Image#2 Still has an odd crop but otherwise a good image
Again please elaborate on the odd aspects of the crop so that I will know what you guys are talking about.

Thanks to all for your comments.


http://www.movingexpos​ure.com (external link)
Portrait, Event, Sports Phtography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdouglas003
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Desoto, Texas
     
Dec 19, 2008 21:49 |  #9

notmydog wrote in post #6908750 (external link)
I have to admit I agree with Benji on this. The first pose just looks flat to me. Your model has great features (see photo 2) but they don't come out at all in the first shot.

My 2 cents.

This was a pose that was chosen by the model. I did not direct her at all.

Even though I know this is not a conventional pose I personally do find it to be appealing in a different way.


http://www.movingexpos​ure.com (external link)
Portrait, Event, Sports Phtography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goforphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,067 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Virginia
     
Dec 19, 2008 22:05 |  #10

The areas I have circled in red are the areas of concern.
In image #1 the model looks clamped into the frame.
At the same time if the tank top had been a halter and only the models skin was showing the #2 image would be ok.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Just another shutterbug.
I am not a photographer, I'm an image capture technician.
Canon 40D - 70-200L f4, 28-135 IS, Nifty Fifty, 70-300 macro, 18-55 420EX Sunpak 266d

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benji
Goldmember
2,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North east Indiana
     
Dec 20, 2008 09:32 |  #11

jdouglas003 wrote in post #6912462 (external link)
This was a pose that was chosen by the model. I did not direct her at all.

Even though I know this is not a conventional pose I personally do find it to be appealing in a different way.

Well Doug, I'm not here to fight, but since when does the client dictate to the pro what to do? Very few people know how to pose themselves so they will look good in a photograph, and this young lady was no exception. If the client demands that I photograph them in a certain way, I oblige them then I tell them I would also like to pose them. The only time this has happened to me she absolutely hated "her" pose and she chose mine.

Benji




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdouglas003
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Desoto, Texas
     
Dec 20, 2008 13:53 |  #12

Benji wrote in post #6914655 (external link)
Well Doug, I'm not here to fight, but since when does the client dictate to the pro what to do? Very few people know how to pose themselves so they will look good in a photograph, and this young lady was no exception. If the client demands that I photograph them in a certain way, I oblige them then I tell them I would also like to pose them. The only time this has happened to me she absolutely hated "her" pose and she chose mine.

Benji

FYI - this was a TFCD shoot with aspiring models who are supposedly trying to become professionals also.
It is a professional model's job to know how to pose, at least that is my understanding.
When I work with aspiring models on a TF basis I ask them how they want to work. Do you want me to direct you or do you want to direct yourself? I believe both ways are mutually beneficial for myself and the model.
If I have something in particular that I'm trying to get then I will pose/direct the model. As I did here. If not I let them do what want to do.
If you look at any fashion oriented magazine, or whatever, you will very quickly realize that your conventional posing rules are not all that important in that world.
As I said before that I have benefited from many of your posts/rules, and I think that it's important to know the rules, but you don't have to always live by them.


http://www.movingexpos​ure.com (external link)
Portrait, Event, Sports Phtography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdouglas003
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Desoto, Texas
     
Dec 20, 2008 13:54 |  #13

goforphoto wrote in post #6912531 (external link)
The areas I have circled in red are the areas of concern.
In image #1 the model looks clamped into the frame.
At the same time if the tank top had been a halter and only the models skin was showing the #2 image would be ok.


Thanks, that's what I thought you were talking about. I appreciate you taking the time to point that out.


http://www.movingexpos​ure.com (external link)
Portrait, Event, Sports Phtography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,909 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
What do you think about these?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1559 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.