Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
Thread started 19 Dec 2008 (Friday) 15:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Feedback, please :)

 
myarc06
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 19, 2008 15:27 |  #1

I'm a beginner photography student and have an assignment to demonstrate shallow depth of field, is this photograph good? Thanks for your help :)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Jeff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,449 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: 42° 34' N 87° 55' W Kenosha, WI
     
Dec 19, 2008 16:21 |  #2

Its a good photograph but I don't think it shows DoF as well as it could. You don't really know if there's 1 foot in focus or 20 feet in focus due to the distance of the background.

Try a shot of a computer keyboard or piano keys maybe where you can see a few keys in focus and ones before and after out of focus.


Jeff
70D | Tokina 12-24 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Canon 28-135 IS| 430EX
Astrophotograpy: QHY9M, Optolong LRGB filters, Meade 10" SCT, Orion EON 110mm APO, Atlas EQ-G to keep it all off the ground.
MY AIRPLANE PICS (external link) | MY ASTRO PICS (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 460
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Dec 19, 2008 17:20 as a reply to  @ Jeff's post |  #3

Ditto :lol:


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SwingBopper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,664 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Japan
     
Dec 19, 2008 17:34 |  #4

Ditto 2. But I'd try shooting a face with eyes sharp nose and ears soft ... etc


EOS 5D II, 40D, Sony R1, Olympus 1030, Canon S5-IS.
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." A. Hamilton

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
17,699 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 5714
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
     
Dec 19, 2008 18:24 |  #5

I think you would want something with both the foreground and background out of focus, leaving just a small margin in focus (in which to put your subject). Here's what I mean. The photo isn't very good (bird is a bit soft), but it does demonstrate shallow DOF pretty well I think.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Levina
Please quote when responding to a post!!!
There is no such thing as ect. It's etc. (with period) from latin et cetera.
Colours are not complimentary but complementary.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neumanns
Goldmember
Avatar
1,465 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North Centeral Minnesota
     
Dec 19, 2008 18:33 |  #6

But save that photo for the assignment on bokeh...


7D, Sigma 8-16, 17-55, 70-200 2.8 IS, 580ExII, ........Searching for Talent & Skill; Will settle for Blind Luck!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
myarc06
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 19, 2008 20:09 |  #7

Thanks everyone although I did have to look up bokeh. I thought I understood as I did these other 2 during the week but figured the doh wasn't accurate for the assignment and thought I nailed it (although the ring shot is kind of like the bird one). I will try again. I'll included the 2 I was talking about. I will keep working on it...thanks.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
myarc06
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 19, 2008 21:25 as a reply to  @ myarc06's post |  #8

okay been working...is this accomplishing the goal here? Thanks for the feedback :D


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattMoore
Goldmember
Avatar
1,839 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX - USA
     
Dec 19, 2008 21:38 |  #9

Try a newspaper or a book....find a line/passage/word you like and focus on that with the lens stopped up to the lowest (numerical) fstop your lens is capable of and focus on the part of the print you've selected.

Take the shot at a 45º from the page.

Something like this (just a quick shot to provide an example, this is by no means a good photo).


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
myarc06
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 20, 2008 08:33 |  #10

Okay so the wine bottle didn't work. Thanks for everyone's help guess I will figure it out.

Feeling frusturated...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Metalstrm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,056 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Malta
     
Dec 20, 2008 08:48 |  #11

Try something with a background that is continuous with the foreground. The mistake (in my opinion, of course) that you're doing is having an object against a blurred background. Something like a street or anything with some perspective might look good.


Kristian D'Amato

http://www.krisdamato.​com (external link) - just my flickr at the moment.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
myarc06
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 20, 2008 09:44 |  #12

My assingment states to do this: Your subject should fill most of the frame, but some of the background should also be visible. Choose a location in which the background is busy and would be distracting if it were in focus, do not use a featureless background.

That's why I thought the Poinsetta photo or the wine one fit the description...hmmm.

thanks for all the advice :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
17,699 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 5714
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
     
Dec 20, 2008 09:45 |  #13

What you are describing here as your assignment is not to 'demonstrate shallow depth of field.' You just want a nice bokeh...


Levina
Please quote when responding to a post!!!
There is no such thing as ect. It's etc. (with period) from latin et cetera.
Colours are not complimentary but complementary.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Metalstrm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,056 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Malta
     
Dec 20, 2008 09:57 |  #14

How about some interesting sign (has to be very interesting) filling in most of the frame, but with a street in view, people and cars and whatnot, but all blurred? Ok, I just got stuck with this street idea, sorry. Hehe :)


Kristian D'Amato

http://www.krisdamato.​com (external link) - just my flickr at the moment.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
myarc06
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 20, 2008 11:57 |  #15

Sorry for the confusion.
Kristian- Yeah you are stuck on the street idea ;) LOL Definately an idea just not sure how interesting it will be out here in the Hamptons




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,490 views & 0 likes for this thread
Feedback, please :)
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is TechOne
794 guests, 383 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.