Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Dec 2008 (Sunday) 19:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Learn Low Light and DOF Shooting

 
MickeyCT
Member
Avatar
145 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Cheshire, CT
     
Dec 21, 2008 19:57 |  #1

I've been a lurker here for three years or so and only rarely post. I literally spend hours reading threads and have learned so much here. Now I'd like some advise

I have a 20D and most often use the 28-135 with it as it is versatile. I prefer low light shooting and really want to improve my skills and learn more about managing the DOF and do some shooting with primes.

After lots of reading, I'm debating between the 35mm f/2.0 and the 28mm f/1.8. I've read good reviews on both but the USM on the 28mm appeals to me as the crackling that my kit lens (18-55 older version) makes annoys me and it seems like the 35mm would be similar.

Is this a good place to start or am I thinking about this all wrong?

Eventually I will purchase a flash and work on that as well and am considering an upgrade in a year or two to a FF.

Mickey


_______________
Mickey

Switching to Olympus OM-D mirrorless system

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 21, 2008 20:06 |  #2

I'd prefer the 28/1.8 because it is a little wider and for the ring USM.

Getting a fast prime is fun, so go ahead and get one. You will have a ball (probably taking shots with too thin of a DOF really) for a while and probably learn a lot.

And down the road you will get that flash and stop down more.;)


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agc1019
Member
184 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Boston, MA
     
Dec 21, 2008 20:25 |  #3

You're right on the money. The 28 f/1.8 is great for indoor low light shooting. I've got one, and it practically lives on my XT.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SCOTTinNJ
Senior Member
Avatar
550 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Dec 21, 2008 21:22 |  #4

Did you consider the 50 1.8 or 50 1.4? I have the 1.4 and love it on my crop body. Then again, I tend to shoot pretty tight. You can venture into primes for about $100 with the 1.8. Great place to start.


Fuji X-T1

9 | 18 | 23 | 50
18-55 | 55-200
35 manual | 50 vintage

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gabe63
Senior Member
622 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Lafayette, CA
     
Dec 21, 2008 22:37 |  #5

I have both the 50 1.4 and 28 1.8 and strongly prefer the 50 1.4. I think it is both from a focal length and sharpness perspective. I could give up the 28 1.8 but would not give up the 50 1.4. I had the 28-135 and could and do live without it...

I am tempted to try the 30 1.4 but since I don't really love the 28 fl I am not sure I will use it. Good luck


:D 16-35IIL, 50L, 70-200 2.8 IS L, 200L F2.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MickeyCT
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
145 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Cheshire, CT
     
Dec 29, 2008 21:36 as a reply to  @ Gabe63's post |  #6

Thank you everyone for writing. I had some computer issues right before Christmas so wasn't able to get back to this.

After much thought I finally decided on the 28 f/1.8. I considered the 50 f/1.4 but I think that is really a bit too long for inside my house on my crop camera.

I was so busy over the holidays I didn't take nearly enough pictures, but did take some and now I need to upload them and see how they came out.

Mickey
(back to lurking)


_______________
Mickey

Switching to Olympus OM-D mirrorless system

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
braidkid
Senior Member
Avatar
371 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Dec 29, 2008 23:28 as a reply to  @ MickeyCT's post |  #7

Mickey, I think you did well. The 28 f1.8 should suit you just fine. Although not as sharp as the 35mm f2 wide open, having USM is a nice feature.


5Dii, 16-35 f4L, 50f1.4, 580ex II, 430ex II
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/braidkid/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,561 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Learn Low Light and DOF Shooting
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1744 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.