These are some basic photos I shot today of my friends S60 2.4T... too bad i don't have a circular polarizer..oh well.. shot with both the 5D2 and 24-70L as well as the 300 2.8L IS
What do you think?
scotteisenphotography Never been blessed  4,147 posts Likes: 17 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Dec 29, 2008 16:29 | #1 These are some basic photos I shot today of my friends S60 2.4T... too bad i don't have a circular polarizer..oh well.. shot with both the 5D2 and 24-70L as well as the 300 2.8L IS What do you think? 2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonças "I just love these big butts!"  1,216 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: London, UK More info | Dec 29, 2008 17:09 | #2 4th really looks great, could be straight out of a mag or brochure. Well done. > Canon 5D MkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 29, 2008 17:14 | #3 gonças wrote in post #6965315  4th really looks great, could be straight out of a mag or brochure. Well done. Is that plate for real? xD Thanks, and yes. It's real. haha 2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
slacker Senior Member  363 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Portland, Oregon More info | Another vote for the 4th pic!! 40D, 30D, 16-35L, 24-70L, 24 1.4L, 50 1.4, 70-200L, 100-400L, 430EX, G9
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 29, 2008 17:16 | #5 slacker wrote in post #6965342 Another vote for the 4th pic!! For me, the thing about the 4th is the relatively shallower DOF that keeps my attention on the car. With the other pics the background's detail is just enough to draw my eye away from the car. Thanks. That's because I used the 300mm at 2.8 =] 2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
morepower4me Member  92 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Sunny AZ More info | Dec 29, 2008 21:14 | #6 Out of curiosity, how much different would the picture be if you had used any other lens at 2.8 and 'zoomed' with your feet? Canon 30d, 50mm 1.4, 28-135 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 29, 2008 21:20 | #7 morepower4me wrote in post #6966806 Out of curiosity, how much different would the picture be if you had used any other lens at 2.8 and 'zoomed' with your feet? Can I get that type of shot with my 50mm? Great pics BTW! I don't think so. The distance + the focal length compresses the backgroudn 2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IMARLOW Senior Member  458 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: London More info | Dec 30, 2008 09:23 | #8 No4 gets my vote too. Canon EOS 1D MARK 111, Canon EOS 20d, 28-300 L, 70-200 L, 24-70 L, 100-400 L. Sigma 10-20mm ,SPEEDLITE 550EX, SPEEDLITE 580EX11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ahhhlawn Senior Member  678 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Dec 30, 2008 14:39 | #9 scotteisenphotography wrote in post #6965347 Thanks. That's because I used the 300mm at 2.8 =] and because the background was further away from the subject (the volvo) Canon 5DMIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1027 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
