Was that the new Tamron 70-200 2.8 with VC? If so, what did you think? ---- Nevermind, I just saw your other thread on 70-200 choices. It was the new Tamron.
kirish Member 228 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Cypress, CA More info | Apr 12, 2013 14:53 | #4606 Was that the new Tamron 70-200 2.8 with VC? If so, what did you think? ---- Nevermind, I just saw your other thread on 70-200 choices. It was the new Tamron. If the Mayans taught us anything, its if you don't finish something its not the end of the world.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zerimar Goldmember  3,529 posts Likes: 267 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | Was at the Getty today with my fisheye   Getty by RickrPhoto, on FlickrRick Rose - Add me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2013 14:08 | #4608 This morning at Doheny Wood.  1N7P3823 by Canon Dog, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andrushka "all warm and fuzzy"  3,735 posts Likes: 12 Joined Oct 2007 Location: OC, CA More info | Apr 13, 2013 18:22 | #4609 |
Simplistic Goldmember  1,443 posts Likes: 15 Joined May 2012 Location: Los Angeles More info | Apr 14, 2013 03:14 | #4610 Ok so you guys gotta help me out. 5D II | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | Canon 85 f/1.8 | Canon 24-105 f/4 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop  More info | Apr 14, 2013 11:08 | #4611 24-105 is pretty much the gold-standard for the 1-lens, travel-light solution. Looks like you already have the 85/1.8. What are you looking/hoping to do differently with the 35 or the 135? Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andrushka "all warm and fuzzy" 3,735 posts Likes: 12 Joined Oct 2007 Location: OC, CA More info | Apr 14, 2013 12:58 | #4612  PermanentlySimplistic wrote in post #15825629 Ok so you guys gotta help me out. I'm wondering if I should sell my 24-105 to get something less expensive as a generall all-purpose lens and then spend the money on more fast primes like the sigma 35 or canon 135L... argh it's bugging me... You can pick up a 28-105 II USM for under $150 and I would say the image quality is hard to differentiate from the 24-105L. You loose IS, the red ring and constant F/4 aperture... but you pocket $600-$700 bucks and still have the same range covered. I have used both of the said lenses for similar purposes (outdoor/travel all in one) and would not hesitate to go with the smaller and cheaper of the two if I needed cash flow. http://www.paradigmphotographyoc.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnPhotography Senior Member  861 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 Location: SoCal More info | spent my Sunday at the LA Zoo with my Goddaughter.
R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnPhotography Senior Member 861 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Apr 15, 2013 13:46 | #4614 Simplistic wrote in post #15825629 Ok so you guys gotta help me out. I'm wondering if I should sell my 24-105 to get something less expensive as a generall all-purpose lens and then spend the money on more fast primes like the sigma 35 or canon 135L... argh it's bugging me... i think it all depends on what exactly you shoot. i use my 24-105 exclusively with flash, that's it. i don't like using it for available, as it's not fast enough for my needs. R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sigmapi Cream of the Crop  11,204 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Los Angeles More info | Apr 15, 2013 19:43 | #4615 Canon Dog wrote in post #15823918 This morning at Doheny Wood. 1N7P3823 by Canon Dog, on Flickrbeautiful! Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airbutchie Not too crunchy  More info | Apr 16, 2013 10:38 | #4616 Peacock Profile... Hehhehehe...  1Ds3 + 200 1.8L + Canon 48mm drop-in CPL... Shot wide open...  Hi. My name is Butch...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xinvisionx Goldmember  More info | Apr 16, 2013 18:35 | #4617  El Matador Sunset by James Stamsek, on Flickr El Matador - Flow by James Stamsek, on FlickrMy name is James ~ Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joonrhee Goldmember  3,897 posts Likes: 639 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Southern California More info | Apr 16, 2013 18:56 | #4618 Nice peacock shot Butch! Beautiful colors and sharpness! a7RII • a7C • V12 • L21 • S24GM • S85
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xinvisionx Goldmember More info | Apr 16, 2013 20:30 | #4619 joonrhee wrote in post #15835552 Nice peacock shot Butch! Beautiful colors and sharpness! Hey James, I really love your El Matador shots. I especially like the first one. What kind of filter did you use for the first shot? Hey man. Thank you. The first shot had no filter on it. They second one had an ND and a CPL to make it dark and require a longer exposure time. My name is James ~ Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zerimar Goldmember 3,529 posts Likes: 267 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | From the Getty last night, had an image in the College student show as well  Getty by RickrPhoto, on FlickrRick Rose - Add me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1785 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
