Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 30 Dec 2008 (Tuesday) 13:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5D MKII Microadjust across 2 bodies.

 
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Dec 30, 2008 13:15 |  #1

Question for you folks. I might have a little free time tomorrow and I'm considering going through the steps to microadjust my lenses.

I have 2 5D bodies, my question is, do I need to MA all of my lenses to both of the bodies, or can I just take the setting from one body and use them on the other? :o

I'm hoping not to make this an all day affair. ;)

Thanks!

Tim


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigBlueDodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Lonestar State
     
Dec 30, 2008 13:38 |  #2

If both of your bodies where absolutely perfect, and the adjustments only affected the lenses, then I would think copying setting would be fine. However, it is possible that part of the adjustment is due to backfocusing issues in your body. Therefore, if you copied the settings from one camera to the other you may find they don't work.

What I would suggest is take one of your lenses, and mount it to your other camera. Manually do a MA to get it in focus. Check the setting to see if it matches your other camera. If the setting is the same as what you found on your other camera, I think it is safe to say that both bodies are spot on, and then I would just copy the settings for all of the lenses. If it is not, then it's reasonable to think that part of the problem lies in the body, and I would re-check with a second lens. If that lens doesn't match the setting from the first camera, then at that point I would just manually MA all my lenses on the second body.


David (aka BigBlueDodge)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ianfp
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Dec 30, 2008 13:41 |  #3

I feel almost certainly that the adjustments will different for each lens/body combination. Hopefully I'm wrong? Good luck!


Ian
Nikon D850, 85mm f/1.4G
5D2
EF17-40 f/4.0 L, EF135 f/2.0L EF200 f/2.8L

EF24-105L, EF100 f/2.8L Macro. EOS-M, 22mm f/2
Hasselblad 500C/M, Planar 80mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Dec 30, 2008 14:13 |  #4

I wouldn't be surprised if the settings are different for each body.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Dec 30, 2008 14:58 |  #5

BigBlueDodge wrote in post #6970856 (external link)
What I would suggest is take one of your lenses, and mount it to your other camera. Manually do a MA to get it in focus. Check the setting to see if it matches your other camera. If the setting is the same as what you found on your other camera, I think it is safe to say that both bodies are spot on, and then I would just copy the settings for all of the lenses. If it is not, then it's reasonable to think that part of the problem lies in the body, and I would re-check with a second lens. If that lens doesn't match the setting from the first camera, then at that point I would just manually MA all my lenses on the second body.

That's a good idea, I will try that!


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Dec 30, 2008 14:59 |  #6

Ianfp wrote in post #6970881 (external link)
I feel almost certainly that the adjustments will different for each lens/body combination. Hopefully I'm wrong? Good luck!

Familiaphoto wrote in post #6971061 (external link)
I wouldn't be surprised if the settings are different for each body.

I'm hoping I won't have to do it for both, but I guess we'll see. :confused:


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Dec 30, 2008 15:44 |  #7

You will;) (canon makes sure that when their is a problem with your lens you send the body AND camera so each can be calibrated to it's own "master counterpart" that they have possession of)


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ziffle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Big "D" - Texas
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:03 |  #8

wallybud wrote in post #6971633 (external link)
You will;) (canon makes sure that when their is a problem with your lens you send the body AND camera so each can be calibrated to it's own "master counterpart" that they have possession of)

So you are saying canon does not have a test bench where they measure the placement of the sensors depth with: laser, mechanical, sound, optical....
and verify against the given manufacturing spec?

And on the lens - hook it to a test fixture and run thru a series of test(electrical) to verify signal sent(focus movement location) = final lens focus mechanics position?
And then verify location of image from lens will land at a given distance specification which would be the sensor if attached to camera body.

I am curious to the meaning of "master counterpart" .......


_______________
Wedding Photog's rule ........... just not sure what???
--
Gear List ~ VIAweddingPhoto(DOT)co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:33 |  #9

It means they take your body and put a certified lens on it (master counterpart to the body) and test it, and then take your lens and put it on a special body (master counterpart) and test it. if there is nothing wrong with the body they know instantly that something is wrong with the lens...they then put it through the paces...they dont just laser everything up...

even if your lens has a focus issue they will only calibrate it if it is "out of factory spec" and it can very well be -5 on the mirco adjust and be considered "within spec" so they won't do anything.

every body is different so every lens has to be micro adjusted to each body...you can't just set the same settings for each unless testing them first. my lens have different focus issues on my 5dmkII than they did on my 40D. and the 40D and lens all went to canon together. this time I can do something about it


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:36 |  #10

PS my 24-70 at 2.8 is -17 at 70mm but VERY VERY different at 24mm so you much do A LOT of testing and find a Compromise;)

I leave it at -17 because usually I only use it at 70mm...otherwise I have my 17-40 for landscape or my 35 for low light...if my 35 is on then the 24-70 at 2.8 is not going to help much


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,717 posts
Likes: 4036
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:38 |  #11

I'm guessing that once the line is set up, cameras are assembled and as they roll off of the production line there is minimal testing done to insure things power up. Then one out of say 10~100 cameras is taken from the assemble line and tested to insure that the line is still within spec. I doubt that each and every camera is individually tested. Way too time consuming.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:39 |  #12

Your lucky you have mostly primes. Also check distances...my 35 is different in focus at close distances and a different micro adjust for farther away...I still have time to exchange it for another one and I might do that as Im not sure if this is normal or not. also I want a sharper copy wide open...;)


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ziffle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Big "D" - Texas
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:41 |  #13

wallybud wrote in post #6971909 (external link)
It means they take your body and put a certified lens on it (master counterpart to the body) and test it, and then take your lens and put it on a special body (master counterpart) and test it. if there is nothing wrong with the body they know instantly that something is wrong with the lens...they then put it through the paces...they dont just laser everything up...

even if your lens has a focus issue they will only calibrate it if it is "out of factory spec" and it can very well be -5 on the mirco adjust and be considered "within spec" so they won't do anything.

every body is different so every lens has to be micro adjusted to each body...you can't just set the same settings for each unless testing them first. my lens have different focus issues on my 5dmkII than they did on my 40D. and the 40D and lens all went to canon together. this time I can do something about it

Thanks for the explanation on master counter part.... :D

The manufacturing part i agree completely..... to the point if you get 2x 50D's or 5D mark ii that are made right after each other - they will be different due to manufacturing variations and still be in spec. :cool:


_______________
Wedding Photog's rule ........... just not sure what???
--
Gear List ~ VIAweddingPhoto(DOT)co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:42 |  #14

Ziffle wrote in post #6971954 (external link)
Thanks for the explanation on master counter part.... :D

The manufacturing part i agree completely..... to the point if you get 2x 50D's or 5D mark ii that are made right after each other - they will be different do to manufacturing variations and still be in spec. :cool:

Id like to get my hands on both of their counterparts and keep THAT kit :p


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ziffle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Big "D" - Texas
     
Dec 30, 2008 16:47 |  #15

gjl711 wrote in post #6971943 (external link)
I'm guessing that once the line is set up, cameras are assembled and as they roll off of the production line there is minimal testing done to insure things power up. Then one out of say 10~100 cameras is taken from the assemble line and tested to insure that the line is still within spec. I doubt that each and every camera is individually tested. Way too time consuming.

I would disagree. I bet every camera get a full functionality test to include final placement of sensor to lens mount in distance and parallelism.

The black dot issues (5dmark ii) would be an outside issue to the normal test cycle.

Before each body is buttoned up - i would not be surprised if there is a test point on a board and/ or run something thru one of the connectors.
this process could be automated pretty easily.


_______________
Wedding Photog's rule ........... just not sure what???
--
Gear List ~ VIAweddingPhoto(DOT)co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,893 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
5D MKII Microadjust across 2 bodies.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1312 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.