i was looking through the custom functions of my 30D and saw i could change between 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop. is there going to be any differences between the two when it comes to photos? or is it just preference? thanks a bunch.
corinmcblide Member 174 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2008 More info | Dec 31, 2008 14:15 | #1 i was looking through the custom functions of my 30D and saw i could change between 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop. is there going to be any differences between the two when it comes to photos? or is it just preference? thanks a bunch. Gripped 5DmkII, Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gimpy00Wang Senior Member 299 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: western MA More info | Dec 31, 2008 14:24 | #2 Just a matter of preference. I'm a 1/3 stop kind of guy myself. "3" is greater than "2" so it has to be better right? 6D | 16-35/4L IS | 24-105/4L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS | 70-300/4-5.6L IS | 35/2 IS | 100/2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Dec 31, 2008 14:26 | #3 I think you will find the vast majorty use 1/3 stops. Digital capture has very little latitude for exposure errors, so the 1/3 stop increments are the best tradeoff in rapid setting selection and fine tuning. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nwa2 Goldmember 1,131 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Manitoba More info | Dec 31, 2008 14:56 | #4 The difference is a 1/6th of a stop, does it make a difference? Depends on your technique. If you are consistently wildly off in exposures (0.5 to 1 stop), then it will not make any difference. If you are consistently very close to correct exposure then it probably will make a difference and you will probably notice it. Canon 6D; 7D; 40D:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | Dec 31, 2008 17:36 | #5 JeffreyG wrote in post #6978182 I think you will find the vast majorty use 1/3 stops. Digital capture has very little latitude for exposure errors, so the 1/3 stop increments are the best tradeoff in rapid setting selection and fine tuning. Plus my incident meter is in 1/3 stops so using 1/2 stops would suck. If you have a Sekonic meter (at least) you can also set that to half stops. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillRoberts revolting peasant 3,079 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: UK More info | Dec 31, 2008 18:59 | #6 I'm at ½ stop, it works fine for me. BiLL
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Dec 31, 2008 21:08 | #7 Permanent banBill Roberts wrote in post #6979680 I'm at ½ stop, it works fine for me. 1/3 for static shots, 1/1 for action. What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BestVisuals Senior Member 763 posts Joined Apr 2007 More info | I use 1/2 stop as it's just enough to drop exposure when something important is in the "blinkies". Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Jan 01, 2009 01:23 | #9 I always use 1/3 stops as it give me more options when adjusting exposure. More chances to get it right or screw it up, depends on the day. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark Dammit I need sleep 3,386 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Perth, Australia More info | Jan 01, 2009 02:31 | #10 I use 1/3 stop because I can't figure out how to make my flash go half stop Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | My flash (580 EX II) automatically adjusts to whether the camera is set to 1/3 or ½. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark Dammit I need sleep 3,386 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Perth, Australia More info | Jan 01, 2009 07:06 | #12 apersson850 wrote in post #6981675 My flash (580 EX II) automatically adjusts to whether the camera is set to 1/3 or ½. I use 1/3 for everyday use but 1/2 for action, as I then have less stops to go to change from shutter speed this to shutter speed that. For action, 1/1 would be better, but my camera can't do that. Oh, I never knew that, Now my new excuse is that my camera only seems to do 1 stop and 1/3... (oh wait I am a fail that is ISO lol) Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jpatten Goldmember More info | Jan 01, 2009 08:58 | #13 I go with 1/3 stop usually Shooting with canon rebel T5 or Canon Rebel XS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NinetyEight "Banned for life" More info | Jan 01, 2009 09:10 | #14 Gimpy00Wang wrote in post #6978171 Just a matter of preference. I'm a 1/3 stop kind of guy myself. "3" is greater than "2" so it has to be better right? ![]() - Chris yeh, but 1/3 is less than 1/2 Kev
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | My first Canon (the Canon EF, when that was a camera body, not a lens series (the one in my avatar, by the way, there with the FD 135 mm f/2.5 S.C.)) had full stops only for the shutter speeds. Only the aperture could you set at half stops, if you didn't use the automatic exposure. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1050 guests, 108 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||