Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 31 Dec 2008 (Wednesday) 14:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1/2 stop or 1/3 stop

 
corinmcblide
Member
174 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
     
Dec 31, 2008 14:15 |  #1

i was looking through the custom functions of my 30D and saw i could change between 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop. is there going to be any differences between the two when it comes to photos? or is it just preference? thanks a bunch.


Gripped 5DmkII, Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS

I LIKE TURTLES :p
FLICKr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gimpy00Wang
Senior Member
Avatar
299 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: western MA
     
Dec 31, 2008 14:24 |  #2

Just a matter of preference. I'm a 1/3 stop kind of guy myself. "3" is greater than "2" so it has to be better right? :D

- Chris


6D | 16-35/4L IS | 24-105/4L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS | 70-300/4-5.6L IS | 35/2 IS | 100/2.8L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 31, 2008 14:26 |  #3

I think you will find the vast majorty use 1/3 stops. Digital capture has very little latitude for exposure errors, so the 1/3 stop increments are the best tradeoff in rapid setting selection and fine tuning.

Plus my incident meter is in 1/3 stops so using 1/2 stops would suck.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nwa2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,131 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Manitoba
     
Dec 31, 2008 14:56 |  #4

The difference is a 1/6th of a stop, does it make a difference? Depends on your technique. If you are consistently wildly off in exposures (0.5 to 1 stop), then it will not make any difference. If you are consistently very close to correct exposure then it probably will make a difference and you will probably notice it.

In either case, you need to know what you are using as it makes selecting exposure faster as you can count the clicks instead of looking at the meter reading.


Canon 6D; 7D; 40D:
There are many tomorrows', but only one today!!
[SIZE=1][COLOR=Black]http://www.Abercrombie​.me.Uk (external link)
http://imagesix.wordpr​ess.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Dec 31, 2008 17:36 |  #5

JeffreyG wrote in post #6978182 (external link)
I think you will find the vast majorty use 1/3 stops. Digital capture has very little latitude for exposure errors, so the 1/3 stop increments are the best tradeoff in rapid setting selection and fine tuning.

Plus my incident meter is in 1/3 stops so using 1/2 stops would suck.

If you have a Sekonic meter (at least) you can also set that to half stops.

Digital has quite a bit of latitude for exposure errors--more than transparency film, and slightly more than color negative film.

Setting the camera at 1/2 stop gives you 1/4 stop accuracy. I would defy anyone to take a look at a picture that was 1/4 stop off and tell that it is. "Correct" exposure in the real world is more than 1/4 stop just pure personal taste.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Dec 31, 2008 18:59 |  #6

I'm at ½ stop, it works fine for me.


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Dec 31, 2008 21:08 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Bill Roberts wrote in post #6979680 (external link)
I'm at ½ stop, it works fine for me.

1/3 for static shots, 1/1 for action.
Works fine, no complains..


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BestVisuals
Senior Member
763 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Dec 31, 2008 21:27 as a reply to  @ Hermeto's post |  #8

I use 1/2 stop as it's just enough to drop exposure when something important is in the "blinkies".


Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jan 01, 2009 01:23 |  #9

I always use 1/3 stops as it give me more options when adjusting exposure. More chances to get it right or screw it up, depends on the day.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Jan 01, 2009 02:31 |  #10

I use 1/3 stop because I can't figure out how to make my flash go half stop :)


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Jan 01, 2009 06:43 as a reply to  @ Mark's post |  #11

My flash (580 EX II) automatically adjusts to whether the camera is set to 1/3 or ½.
I use 1/3 for everyday use but 1/2 for action, as I then have less stops to go to change from shutter speed this to shutter speed that. For action, 1/1 would be better, but my camera can't do that.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Jan 01, 2009 07:06 |  #12

apersson850 wrote in post #6981675 (external link)
My flash (580 EX II) automatically adjusts to whether the camera is set to 1/3 or ½.
I use 1/3 for everyday use but 1/2 for action, as I then have less stops to go to change from shutter speed this to shutter speed that. For action, 1/1 would be better, but my camera can't do that.

Oh, I never knew that, Now my new excuse is that my camera only seems to do 1 stop and 1/3... (oh wait I am a fail that is ISO lol)

I don't see why you would do 1 though, It is pretty quick to turn the dial 3 clicks, and it gives more precision when needed...

Basically there is pretty much no reason why I don't use 1/2 stop, Just I have grown used to 3rd stops and don't see any major reason to change....


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jpatten
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Likes: 258
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Georgia, United States
     
Jan 01, 2009 08:58 |  #13

I go with 1/3 stop usually


Shooting with canon rebel T5 or Canon Rebel XS.
Kit 18-55mm, 18-55mm IS, Sigma 70-300mm APO Macro lens, Canon 60mm f2.8, nifty 50 and Speedlite 600EX-RT (Flash) Rokino 14mm f2.8 UltraWide
My 365 Blog http://jayrayphotos.bl​ogspot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,207 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Jan 01, 2009 09:10 |  #14

Gimpy00Wang wrote in post #6978171 (external link)
Just a matter of preference. I'm a 1/3 stop kind of guy myself. "3" is greater than "2" so it has to be better right? :D

- Chris

yeh, but 1/3 is less than 1/2 ;)

:D :D

I use 1/3 stops for aperture/shutter speed but full stops for ISO.
I personally cant see the advantage if 1/3 ISO stops. Maybe it's because I come from film... ?


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Jan 03, 2009 11:11 as a reply to  @ NinetyEight's post |  #15

My first Canon (the Canon EF, when that was a camera body, not a lens series (the one in my avatar, by the way, there with the FD 135 mm f/2.5 S.C.)) had full stops only for the shutter speeds. Only the aperture could you set at half stops, if you didn't use the automatic exposure.

My second, third and fourth cameras, the Canon T90, EOS 10 and EOS 30, had half stops for shutter speed all the time. So I was used to both these things, before I got the 400D and the 40D, where you suddenly could set 1/3 stops for the shutter speed.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,506 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
1/2 stop or 1/3 stop
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1050 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.