Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Jan 2009 (Friday) 19:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

taping the pins

 
zekeboy
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Sep 2008
     
Jan 02, 2009 19:36 |  #1

Hi guys and gals, just what is meant by taping the pins. thanks zeke




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Jan 02, 2009 19:42 |  #2

Welcome to POTN. This has been covered quite a bit here. My advice would be to:

1. Search the forums.
2. Check out the "Similar Threads" at the bottom of the page.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Jan 02, 2009 19:50 |  #3

zekeboy wrote in post #6991439 (external link)
Hi guys and gals, just what is meant by taping the pins. thanks zeke

It refers to putting a small piece of Scotch tape over three pins on certain lenses that do not autofocus under certain conditions such as using them with a teleconverter. I will find a link a post it here.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Jan 02, 2009 20:29 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #4

Here is a link about pin taping (external link) on the FM site. I think that it can also be used with longer extension tubes where light loss is a problem.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Jan 02, 2009 21:18 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #5

Be aware that the AF will be ultra-erratic. After I taped the pins on my 100-400 it broke two weeks later.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlefield
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
Jan 02, 2009 22:08 |  #6

I would not tape pins on my L lens . They say the cheap Tamron works a lot better .

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …econverter_for_​Canon.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Jan 02, 2009 22:35 as a reply to  @ Littlefield's post |  #7

The XXD and XXXD bodies need at least f5.6 to accurately autofocus. When a slow lens, such as the 100-400, is used with a 2X or 1.4X converter, the camera thinks it's seeing a higher aperture (because of the light loss throught the converter) and will not AF. By taping the pins on the converter, not the lens, the camera is fooled into thinking the converter is not there and it will AF. It can be spotty and will hunt in lower light situations, but it will focus if the light is bright enough.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlefield
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
Jan 02, 2009 23:06 |  #8

Yea and if it hunts a lot it can burn the motor out right ?
I know people that use the cheap Tamron and can autofocus . To me that seems safer but to each's own.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Jan 02, 2009 23:10 as a reply to  @ JWright's post |  #9

After reading all of the links referenced at the bottom of this page concerning taping the pins, I don't think that I am inclined to try it because it seems to be of marginal usefulness in most situations.

Probably a better option is to manually focus if your camera model will accept a microprism focusing screen, but it would need to be a Canon focusing screen because I am not impressed by any of the aftermarket focusing screens that supposedly can be used in any camera because they all have performance issues and/or loss of camera functionality. The biggest problem with trying to manually focus modern lenses is that their design is strictly oriented towards AF and they do not provide the fine manual focusing control that the old manual lenses from film SLR cameras had.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlefield
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
Jan 02, 2009 23:14 |  #10

http://www.fredmiranda​.com/forum/topic/72338​9 (external link)

trenchmonkey's eagle shot is with the cheap Tamron 4OD and 400 5.6 .

a non aperture reporting TC
Not bad :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stickman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,966 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jan 03, 2009 11:23 |  #11

defordphoto wrote in post #6991917 (external link)
Be aware that the AF will be ultra-erratic. After I taped the pins on my 100-400 it broke two weeks later.


You never hear about the downsides to taping, thankyou for mentioning this.


Stick
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stickgunner/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Jan 03, 2009 12:41 as a reply to  @ Stickman's post |  #12

defordphoto wrote in post #6991917 (external link)
Be aware that the AF will be ultra-erratic. After I taped the pins on my 100-400 it broke two weeks later.

Did you tape the pins on the lens or on the converter? To make this work the pins on the converter are the ones that get taped. I've had tape on the pins of my 1.4X converter for several years now and I've had no trouble with either my 100-400 or my 70-200...


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jan 03, 2009 14:18 as a reply to  @ JWright's post |  #13

Given that my 100-400 goes all day at a motorsports event with my little pinky half pressing the shutter to make the IS stay, I'd say that a few extra milliseconds of AF hunting is hardly likely to burn out anything.

Regarding the taping: I followed instruction found in the stickies right here to tape over the three pins on the left* of my Kenko C-AF DG 1.4x Teleplus Pro 300 and its been perfect with the 100-400.

*Holding the converter "lens side" towards you, with the row of eleven pins across the top.

Its a bit fiddly, because the tape is small, I used a pair of tweezers and a loupe. Also, not all converters need taping, the cheaper Kenko does not require it.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,285 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
taping the pins
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2703 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.