toxic Goldmember 3,498 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2008 Location: California More info | Jan 02, 2009 21:28 | #1 I know there's the 135L and the SF, but are there any other 135mm primes? Like some obscure one from Olympus or something... I know Sigma has a 105 and a 150, but those are either too short or too long. If not, is the 135 SF ok on full frame? Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop  13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Jan 02, 2009 22:20 | #2 Well, the EF 135/2 is very hard to beat overall. The Ef 135/2.8 SF is almost as good for a lot less money. But, if you can handle MF, look at my gear list. I'm up to 4 different 135/1.8s as well as other 135s. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me  34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jan 02, 2009 22:21 | #3 135s are a dime a dozen if you can manually focus. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroimage Goldmember 2,169 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jan 03, 2009 00:33 | #4 The EF 135mm f/2.8 SF is a good lens. It doesn't focus very close however. I find I'm often hitting the close focus limit. Adding a 500D filter or an extension tube fixes the problem but is a bit of a hassle. The 52mm filter threads mean cheap filters which is nice too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1227 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? 