BestVisuals Senior Member 763 posts Joined Apr 2007 More info | Jan 03, 2009 15:10 | #1 Still testing in JPEG to find the best settings for the Mk II. What are everyone else's settings?  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 03, 2009 15:12 | #2 Here's the final test and the target photo.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elysium "full of stupid banter"  11,619 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France More info | Jan 03, 2009 15:12 | #3 Congrats but I would really do the right thing and give that thing some justice but taking it outside and enjoy its performance. Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Jan 03, 2009 15:16 | #4 BestVisuals wrote in post #6996339  Still testing in JPEG to find the best settings for the Mk II. What are everyone else's settings? RAW connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
My initial (and incomplete) testing pushes me to the lowest contrast setting, next-to-high sharpness and slightly low saturation. Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elysium "full of stupid banter" 11,619 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France More info | Jan 03, 2009 15:25 | #6 BestVisuals wrote in post #6996389 My initial (and incomplete) testing pushes me to the lowest contrast setting, next-to-high sharpness and slightly low saturation. HTP testing is next. Can you ship it to the UK in a Delorean, ill sort you out. Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 03, 2009 15:31 | #7 You're correct, I have outdoor testing to do. This test was done indoors, controlled lighting (flash) and on a tripod. elysium wrote in post #6996352 Congrats but I would really do the right thing and give that thing some justice but taking it outside and enjoy its performance. Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 03, 2009 15:36 | #8 Ah, I was waiting. Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1576 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
