Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 04 Jan 2009 (Sunday) 23:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

cactus v2 reciever, interfering with camera sensor?

 
e ­ r ­ y ­ k
Goldmember
Avatar
2,055 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
     
Jan 04, 2009 23:27 |  #1

i never realized this on my XTi, but on the 5d & cactus trigger, i notice some weird interference on the top of my images.

if i shoot without the cactus trigger, there is no banding issue up top. these are the v2s.

i dont know what would be causing this, other than cheap manufacturing. i used to stand behind my triggers, but not after i am seeing this. my cactus trigger is modded with the antenna also, which could be why.

-edited- just tested with a non modded trigger, and it seems to be fine. weird... i dont know enough about radio to draw conclusions, but maybe someone could chime in?

:mad:

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v244/erykv1/radiointerference.jpg

Canon EOS 5Dmk3 //

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
e ­ r ­ y ­ k
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,055 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
     
Jan 05, 2009 08:33 |  #2

so... skyports/radiopoppers/​cybersyncs here i come i guess...


Canon EOS 5Dmk3 //

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Papa ­ Carlo
Senior Member
587 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jan 05, 2009 11:36 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

It looks like the flash is out of synch. Cactus trigges are famous for slowing the responce time when the battery drains out.
Try setting the shutter speed to 160 and see if it fixes it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jan 05, 2009 12:07 |  #4

Papa Carlo wrote in post #7008956 (external link)
It looks like the flash is out of synch.

Nope. The exposure goes clear to the bottom of the frame.

Sync problems result in black bottoms.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jan 05, 2009 14:38 |  #5

Curtis N wrote in post #7009197 (external link)
Nope. The exposure goes clear to the bottom of the frame.

Sync problems result in black bottoms.

Now come on, that's a jazz dance from the mid 20s. And sync was NOT their problem...:lol:


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jan 05, 2009 14:56 |  #6

Curtis N wrote in post #7009197 (external link)
Sync problems result in black bottoms.

Titus213 wrote in post #7010160 (external link)
Now come on, that's a jazz dance from the mid 20s. And sync was NOT their problem...:lol:

Actually, that line would sound better if were preceded with "Confucius say..."


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
40Dude6aedyk
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jan 05, 2009 15:07 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #7

Maybe try another memory card? Or different picture size? Or ....?

Is it random or consistent?y


Canon 40D; Canon 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, 85 mm f/1.8; 580EX II; Sigma EF-530 DG Super; CyberSyncs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GSansoucie
Senior Member
Avatar
788 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Southern Maine
     
Jan 05, 2009 19:57 |  #8

Isn't the image inverted on the sensor, so the banding would be on the bottom of the sensor, the furthest from the trigger?

I'd say try another card like 40Dude pointed out.

The banding really looks like a bad card symptom.


-=Glen=-
Flickr Stream (external link)
Check out my 2010 PaD (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/g​sansoucie (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eduardofrances
Senior Member
679 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Jan 06, 2009 11:04 as a reply to  @ GSansoucie's post |  #9

In the strobist forum they discovered the same problem you have: http://www.flickr.com …0295239/?search​=5D+cactus (external link) Banding or erratic weird problems between cactus radio triggers and the 5D. My best advice is to get another radio trigger, the cybersync are a good option without breaking the bank :)


http://flickr.com/phot​os/eduardofrances/ (external link) :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dan ­ j
Goldmember
Avatar
1,575 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Florida
     
Jan 06, 2009 11:46 |  #10

I read about the 5D issue too. Well, obviously you're not going to keep the Cactus over the 5D. I'll be the first to offer some cash so they don't end up in a landfill :)

dan <----- Just doing his part to be green ;)


5D Mark 2/24-70L/100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Microcosm
Senior Member
Avatar
291 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jan 06, 2009 12:03 |  #11

Very interesting problem.
This comment is easily my favorite from that Flickr thread:
" iaincaradoc Pro User says:
Congratulations! You've discovered why FCC approval is required for devices that emit RF. "


All Gear| Canon 50D | Canon Rebel XTi | EF 17-40mm f/4 L | EF 24-105mm f/4 L | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS | EF 50mm f/1.8 | EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 | 580EX II
Nikon EM | 50f/1.8 | 100 f/2.8 | Speedlight SB-E
MyFlickr (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
e ­ r ­ y ­ k
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,055 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
     
Jan 07, 2009 10:52 |  #12

interesting, thanks for the flickr post.

i have two triggers. one modded, and one un-modded. and the unmodded one doesn't give me the banding issue.

sucks though, mine were flawless operation wise :(


Canon EOS 5Dmk3 //

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4548
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 07, 2009 10:58 |  #13

e r y k wrote in post #7023924 (external link)
interesting, thanks for the flickr post.

i have two triggers. one modded, and one un-modded. and the unmodded one doesn't give me the banding issue.

sucks though, mine were flawless operation wise :(

Ah, interference from a transmitting unit that does not comform to the same configuration as the test unit provided by the manufacturer for EMI emissions testing...it is no surprise at all.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lulu65
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jan 21, 2009 10:35 |  #14

Using my Vs2 and 5D for a while, I just bumped into that problem the day I made a lowkey shooting session. The banding is exactly the one that you show us on the top picture except that mine is red. I possess two unmoddified units, have the problem with both. But it's hard to see the banding in a very well lit scene...

Never heard of that with my 40D and XT.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4548
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 21, 2009 11:04 |  #15

lulu65 wrote in post #7125031 (external link)
Using my Vs2 and 5D for a while, I just bumped into that problem the day I made a lowkey shooting session. The banding is exactly the one that you show us on the top picture except that mine is red. I possess two unmoddified units, have the problem with both. But it's hard to see the banding in a very well lit scene...

Never heard of that with my 40D and XT.

So I need to retract my earlier statement, about "a transmitting unit that does not comform to the same configuration as the test unit "...simply a badly designed product that somehow snuck thru EMI testing!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,140 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
cactus v2 reciever, interfering with camera sensor?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1704 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.