I'm looking for a new monitor, and I'm not really sure of which one will suit me the best.
I use my monitor mostly for photography (magazine work), software development, multimedia and office work. Gaming is not an issue for me.
I've got a Macbook with a TN panel that is not suitable for photography work. I can do some photoshop such as combining multiple exposures, brightness, contrast and sharpening, but I have to let another do the color corrections and I've want to do it myself to have full control.
So what I'm looking for is a monitor that has realistic colors and that is suitable for press work. The colors on the paper have to be the same as the colors on the display.
Since I've got a Macbook the new 24" Cinema Display seems like a nice display, but I'm not so fond of the glossy screen. I don't think calibration will work as well as on a matte screen and the colors aren't that good. On the other hand, it's a very nice display, very minimalistic and it's suits my Macbook perfectly.
If I'm not gonna buy a ACD, it's gotta be an Eizo display. I've got two Eizo CRT monitors and I hear very good things about the TFT displays so that's not a tough decision. Anyway, I'm not quite sure which Eizo suits me the best. I think that a HD2442W is a very good screen for me, in combination with an Spyder 3 Pro. I've seen the HD2441W too, it's about 200 euro cheaper (which is quite a lot on an amount of 1200 euro) and I don't think they differ very much.
So I have a few questions:
- Is an ACD nearly as good as an Eizo S-PVA screen, color-wise ?
- Does a HD2442W or HD2441W suit my needs ?
- What are the differences between the HD2442W and the HD2441W and which one would you choose, and why ?
Thanks in advance !
Sorry for my terrible english by the way.


