Just upgraded from the XTi to the 40d and now I need some advice.
Should my next addition be a grip or a 430ex flash?
Which would be the best to do first?
| POLL: "Grip or Flash?" |
Grip | 13 11.5% |
430ex Flash | 97 85.8% |
Other | 3 2.7% |
Jan 06, 2009 15:54 | #1 Just upgraded from the XTi to the 40d and now I need some advice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ALT1MATE Senior Member 451 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: NYC More info | Jan 06, 2009 15:58 | #2 My 430EX opened up a whole new world to me when I first got it. The grip on a XTI just made it feel "normal" like that's how it was supposed to be in the first place. The ergonomics and weight of the 40D are so much better than a gripped/ungripped XTI that I think you could go without a grip for a while. Ian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
weezerfan84 Senior Member 903 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Fort Smith, AR More info | Jan 06, 2009 15:59 | #3 Yep, when I got my 430ex, I didn't know why I didn't purchase it first. It made indoor picture taking 11000000000000000 times easier!! Canon 5D classic/Canon 85 1.8/17-40L/Siggy 50 f/1.4 ex/430ex speedlite/and some books
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grentz Goldmember 2,874 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Midwest, USA More info | Jan 06, 2009 16:00 | #4 Flash, opens up new things to do with your photos. Search.TechIslands.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop 5,513 posts Gallery: 52 photos Likes: 684 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | Get the grip if you want everybody to think you have a 1D and don't like charging your batteries between shoots. I've never seen the need for the grip. I have two batteries and have never drained one of them on a shoot. Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Jan 06, 2009 16:09 | #6 Flash, definitely. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2009 17:06 | #7 Thanks for the input everyone!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sanity1082 Member 203 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Jan 06, 2009 17:09 | #8 the 430ex should be fine. canon: XTi, nifty fifty, 18-55, 430ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grentz Goldmember 2,874 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Midwest, USA More info | Jan 06, 2009 18:03 | #9 msowsun wrote in post #6386067 here are the improvements of the 430EX II over the 430EX: 1) Metal Hotshoe 2) Quick release mechanism 3) Silent recycle 4) Faster recycle 5) FEC adjusted in 1/3 stop increments 6) Nine Custom Functions (vs 6 on 430EX) 7) In-camera Flash Menu with Digic III or IV Cameras (40D, 50D, 1D III, XSi, XS, G9, G10 etc.) Also might look at the 420ex if on a budget, I picked up a 420ex for quite cheap and it works wonderfully for my needs (mostly used as bounce flash on my 30D). puttick wrote in post #930632 Having replaced my 420EX with a 430EX, and knowing that there are probably others who are considering the same, here are my observations: 1. Very slightly smaller 2. GN essentially the same (43 vs 42) 3. Bounce/swivel the same, but controlled by just one button 4. Faster recycling 5. Controls via LCD menu - a huge improvement over the 420ex 6. FEC on flashgun - another huge improvement. This alone would make the 430ex a good buy for someone with a 300d/Rebel 7. Manual flash control from 1/1 to 1/64 power - very useful indeed 8. Zoom head now linked to crop factor, so better compatibility with APS-C sensor cameras (less waste of light) 9. Wide angle diffuser panel built into head (like the 580), when flipped down covers 14mm 10. A much nicer carry case 11. Automatic setting of camera WB for flash Altogether, this is a significant improvement over the 420ex, well worth the extra if you are choosing between the two, and IMO well worth the upgrade if you already have a 420ex. Nigel Search.TechIslands.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
twiggles Senior Member 763 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Ohio More info | Jan 06, 2009 18:09 | #10 +1 for the 430EX, Flash really opens up a new world of photography... T-Wiggles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jpiano Goldmember 1,324 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Bay Area, California More info | Jan 06, 2009 18:16 | #11 Flash for sure!!! You can go on without a grip but without flash and proper lighting your going to be very limited. Piano
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnJ80 Cream of the Crop 5,442 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2006 More info | Jan 06, 2009 20:47 | #12 The grip won't give you better image quality. The flash will - especially when compared to the worthless onboard flash. Obsessive Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Jan 07, 2009 08:15 | #13 Yes, the flash first. The grip has a use, but not in all circumstances. When I shot sport it was Indispensible. Since I not longer shoot fast action sports I do not have a grip. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FrostQ Member 200 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario More info | why is it indispensible when you shoot sport??? Canon G12 | 430EXII w/ stofen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnJ80 Cream of the Crop 5,442 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2006 More info | Jan 07, 2009 09:36 | #15 because you shoot in portrait mode and there are an extra set of shutter controls. Obsessive Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1048 guests, 107 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||