Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 06 Jan 2009 (Tuesday) 17:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Review: Really Right Stuff BH-55

 
Greg_C
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,674 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 34
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jan 06, 2009 17:03 |  #1

I've recently switched from a Manfrotto 488RC2 head to the Really Right Stuff BH-55 with B2 AS II clamp and the Arca Swiss system. I kept the Manfrotto legs so the BH-55 is mounted on my Manfrotto 190ProB. For now the Manfrotto legs will suffice but I do plan to upgrade those at some stage also.

Why did I change? I use a tripod a lot more that most for my macro shots and the droop with the old ball head was starting to be an issue. How many people have see the subject shift in the viewer when they tightened up the ballhead? This is what I was experiencing with the 488 and I was compensating for this each time I tightened the ballhead. With a good tripod and head I can often lower the shutter speed to 1/60sec when using my 180 and full set of Kenko tubes. I then get a better natural colour in the background and the flash is less noticeable. The PCL-1 Panning Clamp and Mini-Clamp Package will also be worth while additions as I plan to do more landscapes and panoramas.

BH-55 Specs
Weight 0.725kg (1.6lb)
Load capacity 22kg (50lb)

You will read around the web that many consider the load capacity quoted by RRS for the BH-55 to be on the low side and i tend to agree. It probably can take more but these are their figures.

Price
Ouch! RRS gear is expensive. This falls into to you get what you pay for category, this type of equipment is truly an investment that will last for many years.

Details
When you take delivery of a any RRS gear you can immediately appreciate the craftsmanship that goes into their equipment. The BH-55 comes with a bag to protect it - a nice addition to help protect your investment. The next thing you notice is how big the BH-55 is, that said, it's shorter than most other ballheads in the class.

It easily fitted onto the 190ProB in a minute. The base of the BH-55 is a little bigger than the top plate on the 190ProB. Though this might look a little odd when you look at it closely it doesn't present any problems.

BH-55 mounted on Manfrotto 190Pro

IMAGE: http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image40166.jpg

The first thing to say is --- it doesn't creep or droop. The 488 used to suffer from droop, but the BH-55 is rock solid. This is part of what makes it special. The ballhead in the BH-55 has to be about 2x the size of the ball head in the 488. The BH-55 locks the ball into place with a side clamping mechanism, most other ballheads clamp from the bottom. The BH-55 has a pan knob, ball head knob and a drag knob. With the drag knob you adjust the drag tension on the ball, you can then adjust the ball without the main ball knob being totally tight. Like this it will hold a 100-400 on a gripped body and you can still adjust the position of the lens.

BH-55 fitted with B2 AS II
IMAGE: http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image40167.jpg

The Arca Swiss plates fit perfectly into the clamps. I chose to go with the leaver release clamps. The leaver has three positions, locked, partially open, fully open. In the fully open position you can insert the lens plate easily. In the partially open position you can slide the lens plate from side to side. The RRS plates have a very small screw at either end and this stops the travel so the plate will not totally slide out of the clamp. When locked, there is no movement in the lens or body plate. As a comparison, there always was a little play in my Manfrotto RC2 plates and clamps.

A note about the Lever Release clamps. When I purchased the BH-55 as a complete package it comes with the B2 AS II Lever Release Clamp. This clamp is designed to fit onto the BH-55 with a countersunk screw from the top and has no thread internally - it comes fitted like this. The B2 LR II by comparison has the countersink drilling AND the 3/8 thread.

As you can see from the weight listed above it's a little on the heavy side compared to some of the other Arca Swiss ball heads. The link at the bottom has a comparison of the weights of the more common ball heads. This is probably not the head to choose if you are looking for a light weight travel solution. ie This is probably not the ballhead you are going to take on a long trek when you are carting all of the equipment yourself.

Length of BH-55 on 190Pro
This is shot will give you an idea about the length of this combination. Call it 26".

IMAGE: http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image40165.jpg

I've also added a BGE2-L40 L plate to the 40D and have quickly adjusted to this being fitted to the camera. It's nicely contoured and I hardly notice it on the body, a very big improvement over the ergonomics of the Manfrotto L plate. I leave the body plate fitted to the camera all of the time. During the Christmas holidays this proved to be a good idea. At one stage I grabbed the camera and tripod and raced to the beach to catch a huge Supercell Storm. Having the plate on already meant I was instantly ready to shoot the pano in landscape or portrait. I was not wanting to expose myself to a lightning strike so time was important. The result is here.


I kept the Manfrotto 486 ball head on my monopod but switched the plate to a RRS B2 LRII. The RC2 plate simply unscrews and I screwed on the RRS B2 LR. With the addition of a little Loctite Blue I was done. RRS doesn't recommend leaver releases on monopod so I'll see how I go with this.

Here's a shot of the head along with some extra's used for panos. A friend here put it quite well.

So you've got your camera fitted to the L-bracket which sits in a clamp, which sits in a clamp, which attaches to a rail that sits in a pano clamp with a plate attached that fits into a QR clamp on top of the ball head?

Even with all of this it is very stable. I won't be using it like this photo every day, normally I wouldn't have the CL-1 Panning Clamp and Mini-Clamp Package attached.

Pano Setup

IMAGE: http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image39168.jpg


Conclusion
I've now been using this for about two months with no problems. It is a lot easier to switch from landscape to portrait mode with the L plate attached to the camera and the directness with which the plates and clamps fit together is great. To conclude, I'm totally satisfied with my purchase of Really Right Stuff equipment and would recommend it to anyone.

Further Reading

Really Right Stuff BH-55
http://reallyrightstuf​f.com/ballheads/02.htm​l (external link)

A comparison of popular Arca Swiss Ballheads
http://www.websiteopti​mization.com/speed/twe​ak/ballhead/ (external link)

An excellent article on tripods
http://bythom.com/supp​ort.htm (external link)

Greg
Blog (external link) | Photogallery (external link) | 1DmkIV + other stuff
Sanity is a madness put to good use.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
harv3589
Senior Member
523 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Okotoks, Alberta - Wild Rose Country
     
Jan 06, 2009 18:35 |  #2

Great review....I have the exact same set up you have in the last pic with the pano set-up, except that mine is ontop of a Manfrotto 055PROB. RRS does live up to its name, no would be disappointed in buy anything they manufacture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Jan 06, 2009 19:08 |  #3

Awesome! Make sure this makes it into the tripod sticky!!! Great job!


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
P1X4R
Member
Avatar
138 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Emeryville, California
     
Jan 06, 2009 19:19 |  #4

nice write-up. it's exactly the reason i switched over from the 488RC2 ballhead system. RRS definitely is quality but you do pay for it.

i also have two of their L brackets which are excellently designed but the one i have for my 1DmkIII has a problem with Canon's remote switch (RS-80N3) in portrait position. i ended up using an older generic made one with a smaller "head" that fits better with the B2 AS II clamp. i tried spacing it but i wanted a tighter fit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Jan 06, 2009 19:24 |  #5

Excellent writeup with great pictures. too.

May I make a comment or two. I too own this fine ballhead. My experience has been slightly different though.

I find the head does suffer from a very small amount of creep. At least mine does.

I find the drag control could be better. In a direct comparison with my friend's Markins Q20, the Markins had a better feel to the drag and handled a large telephoto better, though I'd rather use my sidekick which would be fine.

The RRS has two slots to drop portrait mode, while the Markins has one.

It is quite a bit heavier than the Markins, but that's neither here nor there to me. An extra pound never makes a difference to me.

Again, great job. The only other thing I'd say is RRS has amazing customer service. Very responsive and personal attention.

mark




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bps
Cream of the Crop
7,607 posts
Likes: 406
Joined Mar 2007
Location: California
     
Jan 06, 2009 20:39 |  #6

Greg,

Outstanding review! Thank you for taking the time to do this. Many will benefit from your effort!

Bryan


My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Jan 06, 2009 22:24 |  #7

Nice review. Now that you have a top dog ballhead system, you need a top dog legset to reap the full performance of the BH55.


Jim

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Clearie
Junior Member
Avatar
21 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 06, 2009 22:49 |  #8

Great review, I have the same ballhead setup with a Gitzo 1548.


CLEARIE
Canon Mark IV, Canon EF 16-35mm F/2.8 L II, Canon EF 24-70mm F/2.8 L, Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8 L IS USM, Canon EF 100-400mm F/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 L IS USM Macro, RRS BH-55 Ballhead, Gitzo 1548 MkII, 3531s Tripods, (3) 600 EX-RT speedlites, (1)ST-E3-RT :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Greg_C
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,674 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 34
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jan 06, 2009 23:06 |  #9

Thanks folks.

Mark, you raise a couple of good points. I'll also add a shot of the ballhead showing the notches.

I've sent a PM to get it added tot eh Sticky.


Greg
Blog (external link) | Photogallery (external link) | 1DmkIV + other stuff
Sanity is a madness put to good use.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jan 07, 2009 02:29 |  #10

Nice review. Added :)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meaty0
Goldmember
Avatar
3,519 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jan 10, 2009 21:28 |  #11

Very comprehensive review Greg. And now that I've seen it in action, I must have one! :-D

Seriously though, the Manfrotto 488RC2 of mine is starting to droop a bit too, with all the gear I'm stacking onto it. I had done some research on this last year and it came down to the Markins or the RRS. I like the service from RRS. Answered all my questions very promptly.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobcan
Member
Avatar
47 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Frozen Western Canada
     
Jan 17, 2009 05:45 |  #12

Outstanding Effort here.. and YES, you DO get what you pay for don't you..??!!


bw

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lotus ­ Man
Member
41 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jan 18, 2009 10:23 |  #13

nice job




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Feb 12, 2009 13:20 |  #14

I have the same legs, 488RC2 head and camera that you have and have just been researching RRS gear and I plan on getting the exact setup that you got so this review is perfectly timed. Thanks.

I have a question about the lever release. Does it have a safety like the 488RC2? What if yo catch it on something will it open? I watched a video on the RRS website and it didn't look like there was any safety on it. My biggest question now is whether to get the lever release or the knob one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jannie
Goldmember
4,936 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
May 19, 2009 09:57 |  #15

Wow, this is exciting me, I want the RSS 55 head but was wondering at least for now if it would work on my 055MF4 tripod. I might get heavier Gitzo legs as well but this way I can plan that for later on and at least have part of the system.


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

23,098 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Review: Really Right Stuff BH-55
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1190 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.