These two images were taken on assignment in Brussels in recent years. Comments and suggestions for Photoshop improvements are welcome.
Thanks for looking.
ThisOldHag Senior Member ![]() 620 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Kent, England More info | Jan 07, 2009 09:31 | #1 These two images were taken on assignment in Brussels in recent years. Comments and suggestions for Photoshop improvements are welcome. www.CindyLouDale.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Benji Goldmember 2,205 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2006 Location: North east Indiana More info | Jan 07, 2009 12:08 | #2 Image # 1 has some major problems. First your exposure is way off. The highlights on his nose and left cheek are overexposed and the shadows on his right side are underexposed. Also the pose is static and boring with his shoulders turned flat to the camera. The cure? More fill light and a rim light.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samoan_ridah Member ![]() 145 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | These are great portraits but I don't know if they would be good as a "business" shot unless he is a superhero (not joking). The lighting gives him that classic villainous look which really draws you but I don't know if it would work if he's trying to sell houses or insurance. ::Canon 40D::
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawkeye60 Goldmember ![]() 2,079 posts Likes: 6 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Mesa, Arizona More info | Jan 07, 2009 13:28 | #4 What Benji said... It's a lens not a lense!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 07, 2009 13:29 | #5 Benji wrote in post #7024444 ![]() Image # 1 has some major problems. First your exposure is way off. The highlights on his nose and left cheek are overexposed and the shadows on his right side are underexposed. Also the pose is static and boring with his shoulders turned flat to the camera. The cure? More fill light and a rim light. The exposure in # 2 is much better but the pose is still very static and we are looking up his nostrils. The camera should have been about 12 to 18 inches higher. Benji Thanks for your comments Benji. The poses were in accoradance with the magazine's requirements. I'm hoping to get a rim light sometime soon - 2009 xmas wish list maybe. www.CindyLouDale.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 09, 2009 13:56 | #6 samoan_ridah wrote in post #7025062 ![]() These are great portraits but I don't know if they would be good as a "business" shot unless he is a superhero (not joking). The lighting gives him that classic villainous look which really draws you but I don't know if it would work if he's trying to sell houses or insurance. Strictly as portraits, these are great and I would hire you in a heartbeat to take mine! Thanks for your kind words. One of the other portrait photos I took went onto a magazine cover... and as a matter of fact, the subject is a superhero www.CindyLouDale.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Broncobear Goldmember ![]() 2,415 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada More info | Jan 09, 2009 15:35 | #7 I find the lighting to be off for both of them, especially the first one but I don't like the composition of the second one..it's like I'm looking right into his nostril. "The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." "
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Eternal Louper 727 guests, 305 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |