Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Jan 2009 (Friday) 07:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why does everone hate silver cameras?

 
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,393 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1388
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jan 11, 2009 10:38 |  #91

friz wrote in post #7050950 (external link)
I prefered silver bodied film cams because it took them longer to get hot in the sun. Heat + Film = Bad pics.

If you really have to keep the camera sitting in one spot, such as on a tripod, throwing a white towel over it does a much better job than depending on surface coloring.

If you're in motion, such as walking around, it makes no difference.

By the way, the distinction has already been made between silver-painted plastic and true silver metal (usually brushed chrome). Brushed chrome is far, far more attractive than silver-painted plastic, and that distinction should be made.

Except perhaps for some silver painted plastic Rebels in later years, film cameras were brushed chrome metal (although the Canon AE-series cameras were brushed chrome metal-clad plastic).


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fiveFPS
Goldmember
1,180 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 11, 2009 12:45 |  #92

If silver marks 1Ds were made and offered at a cheaper price.. do you think people would by it?


Canon XTI | Canon 430ex | Crumpler 7MDH | 18-55mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,393 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1388
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jan 11, 2009 12:51 |  #93

fiveFPS wrote in post #7052901 (external link)
If silver marks 1Ds were made and offered at a cheaper price.. do you think people would by it?

If it were cheaper, yeah, someone would. The question is: Would they buy it if it were more expensive.

Do you mean silver painted plastic, by the way, or brushed chrome metal?


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jan 11, 2009 12:53 |  #94

TaDa wrote in post #7038137 (external link)
Who cares what color it is, as long as it takes good images?

i do for one and i'll bet most of us prefer a black camera :D.

given the choice between a silver or black camera i would take black. i'll go one better.....i would even pay a bit more for a black camera if i had to :D.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jan 11, 2009 12:55 |  #95

fiveFPS wrote in post #7052901 (external link)
If silver marks 1Ds were made and offered at a cheaper price.. do you think people would by it?

depends on how much cheaper, of course :D.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sfordphoto
Goldmember
2,564 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Jan 11, 2009 12:57 |  #96

black all the way


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jan 11, 2009 12:59 |  #97

RandyMN wrote in post #7050539 (external link)
And those plates don't work while attached to the lens collar rather than the camera body?

Seems to me that if you have one plate attached to the camera, then it could just as easily been attached to the collar.

the plate is custom fit to the camera. it will not correctly fit the tripod mount.

if you were using a good ballhead you'd probably know this :D.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jakew810
Member
Avatar
167 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Bensalem, Pa
     
Jan 11, 2009 16:39 |  #98

pendulum15 wrote in post #7048830 (external link)
Nah the black wears off and goes silver
http://www.fredmiranda​.com/forum/topic/69300​9/0 (external link)
:D

And if canon brought out a 1d4p or something that was the exact same as the 1d4, but was pink and cheaper I would go for it :)

That's just abuse to the camera! :)


Cameras: Rebel XT, Rebel XSi
Lenses: 18-55 Kit lens non IS, 50mm f/1.8, Canon 10-22 f4/5.6
Flashes: Canon 430EX, Canon 580EX
Bags: Canon 200DG, Tamrac Expedition 7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,393 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1388
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jan 11, 2009 17:04 |  #99

ed rader wrote in post #7052978 (external link)
the plate is custom fit to the camera. it will not correctly fit the tripod mount.

if you were using a good ballhead you'd probably know this :D.

ed rader

The makers of quick-release devices for good ballheads do make plates for lens mounts as well as camera mounts. If someone preferred quick-release devices, it would behoove him to get them for both his camera bodies and his long lenses.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sheldonc
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Central Valley, CA
     
Jan 12, 2009 00:17 as a reply to  @ RDKirk's post |  #100

I've had plenty of "silver" SLRs, most with black accents (old Nikons, Canons, Olys, etc) but so far only black dSLRs. I like black. It's clean and blends in well. Fewer people will notice a black camera (maybe). It's discreet and incognito.

I was going to mention, yeah why if we all want black so bad, that the most expensive lenses are white and plastic-y? Very chic looking, eh? ;) They stick out like a rich, sore thumb.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cooltouch
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Likes: 117
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Jan 12, 2009 00:34 |  #101

Heck, even Pro Nikon users liked chrome cameras -- pink chrome no less. A "champagne" F3 Titanium:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


Best,

Michael

Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.​com/photo/gear.html (external link)
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.​com/gallery3/index.php​/ (external link)
My Flickr Page: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/11308754@N08/ (external link)
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.​com/blogistan/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Oteck
Senior Member
570 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver B.C.
     
Jan 12, 2009 00:57 |  #102

That doesn't count, the black balances out the nikon giving a nicer look. The only thing black on the silver rebels is the grip so thats not enough to even it out with black lens on.

There is a cure for this and that's to put armor on it. At least this way it will hide all the silver and stop it from chipping.


Canon 7D, 50D/BG-E2N, 580EXII
EF-s 10-22mm, EF-s 17-55mm 2.8 [70-200mm IS 2.8L[COLOR=Red][COLOR=Blac​k]][85L[COLOR=Red] [COLOR=Black]1.2] (coming soon 35L II? [COLOR=Red][COLOR=Blac​k]50L II?)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cskn0125
Goldmember
Avatar
1,665 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jan 12, 2009 02:43 |  #103

It's not that people hate silver cameras, it's that silver cameras hate people.


PORTFOLIOexternal link // FACEBOOKexternal link // TWITTERexternal link // BLOGexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AzzKicker
Goldmember
Avatar
1,107 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
     
Jan 12, 2009 08:42 |  #104

form wrote in post #7038567 (external link)
I prefer silver or some other non-pro looking color; because many of the local resorts and some other pro photographers dislike photographers shooting in their space, a less "obviously professional" color would be great for me.

Who cares what other photographers say. I'm not gonna stop shooting a SPOT just because some other punk pro thinks he's the only one that can shoot an area. F)(*()* them.


BTW, SILVER is UGLY. :)


Ruben D. Zamora
Canon 6D Mark II, Canon 20-35L,Genesis 200 Strobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ K
Senior Member
451 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Rockledge, FL
     
Jan 12, 2009 15:47 as a reply to  @ AzzKicker's post |  #105

I always thought a silver Rebel would make a good vacation camera where you did not want to attract much notice. You could bring some of your regular glass and keep the pro bodies at home.


Canon: 7D (2, 1 gripped), 50D gripped, 500 f/4L IS, 100-400 L IS, 70-200 f/4L IS, 28-135 IS, 10-22, 15-85 IS, 1.4x II, 580EX
5D3, 24-105 f/4L IS, 17-40 f/4L IS, TS-E 24 f/3.5L II. S100 p&s
Gitzo GT3530LS, Wimberley ver. II. Manfrottto: tripod 055XPROB legs, 448RC2 head; monopod 679B, 234RC tilt head

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,280 views & 0 likes for this thread, 88 members have posted to it.
Why does everone hate silver cameras?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2123 guests, 83 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.