gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jan 10, 2009 21:34 | #1 One more of my friend Ann. This was from an impromptu shoot alongside the lake. It was actually a test shoot for my 70-200 f4 L. Love that lens.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonnoob Cream of the Crop  8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Jan 10, 2009 21:38 | #2 I feel like her skin looks fake... just doesnt look right..too much touch up maybe? I dunno but it doesnt look right to me.. David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1downfall Goldmember  4,059 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2007 Location: virginia beach, va More info | agree on the skin appearance. Also, might want to crop out that thing in the top left of the shot. Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
H2Ohta Member 79 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Wenatchee, WA More info | Jan 11, 2009 12:20 | #4 1downfall wrote in post #7052755  agree on the skin appearance. Also, might want to crop out that thing in the top left of the shot. Me three on the appearance of the skin. It just looks too processed. There is also a "thing" to her right in the water that could be cloned out and a stick "thing" coming out of her left knee. Chris Ohta
LOG IN TO REPLY |
louieabellera Member 154 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Jan 12, 2009 00:15 | #5 fourth-ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drexp2000 Member 82 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | Jan 13, 2009 15:27 | #7 i agree on too much PP. The sunset colors are awesome though. Do you have a wider shot of the place? ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rhinotherunt Looking for a Rock  7,129 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Jasper, AL More info | Jan 13, 2009 15:31 | #8 Looks like you have started putting the 70-200 to good use. I do not care for the pp as well. Post the original to give us a before and after. Ryan McGill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2009 21:52 | #9 Here is an uncropped version with no skin smoothing. I think I've spent too much time looking at the glamour forum where smoothing is sometimes a little strong.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawkfeather Member  221 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: North Central PA More info | Mar 29, 2012 14:37 | #10 A bit too grainy in the face and the lighting appears to be too overbearing in the shot. www.adkinsphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charrocallado Goldmember  1,144 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2008 Location: PA More info | Mar 29, 2012 14:38 | #11 holy back from the dead thread batman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 29, 2012 14:54 | #12 Yikes, that is an old one... I guess he took my critique of his recent post personally and wanted to find something to go back with..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Daship Senior Member 765 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Mar 29, 2012 14:58 | #13 Smoothing the skin would like fine if you didnt over sharpen and over clarity it to death. IMO a woman shot should never have clarity pushed up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 29, 2012 14:59 | #14 Daship wrote in post #14176249 Smoothing the skin would like fine if you didnt over sharpen and over clarity it to death. IMO a woman shot should never have clarity pushed up. I freely admit to blowing that one. I had just gotten some new gear and software and pushing it too hard.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CelticTiger Goldmember  1,037 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO More info | Mar 29, 2012 15:53 | #15 gonzogolf wrote in post #14176217 Yikes, that is an old one... I guess he took my critique of his recent post personally and wanted to find something to go back with.. ^This.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1048 guests, 108 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
