dc5itr329 wrote in post #7177670
I'm looking to get into more prime lenses and anything under 2.8, however I'm not looking into manual focusing. Wondering if you would still recommend it?
The viewfinder is brighter than the stock screen when using a lens faster than 4. I would definitely recommend it for lenses 2.8 and faster.
SMP_Homer wrote in post #7179752
How's the EF-S screen when not using something 2.8 or faster?
I don't bother to switch the screen when switching lenses. I use it with my 70-200 4L and it's not too much different than the stock EF-a screen, maybe a little darker, but not so much to make a difference.
When using with the stock 17-85 lens, things get a little dark at the long end (f/5.6) of the lens when using indoors.
Bulldawg534 wrote in post #7184035
Please forgive my potential ignorance, but how does this improve your focusing ability. I understand the grid will allow you to orient your image better but I am missing the benefit for focusing. Thanks!
From what I understand, the EF-a screen tries to make the image in the viewfinder brighter by using micro-prisims to aim more light your eyes. In doing so, the light is only taken from the centre f/4 portion of the lens. This in turn limits the DOF preview to f/4.
The EF-s screen is more of a matte finish and takes light from the entire lens, thus giving a more precise (shallower) DOF preview through the viewfinder, but at the expense of darkening the view as compared to the stock EF-a.
Now if you can actually have the DOF of a f/2.8 or faster lens you can see where the focus point of the image. This makes manual focus easier.
Does my description make sense?
A7R, Firin 20mm, CV 21/4, CV 40/1.4, 100ZE, 300 4LIS, Tamron 150-600, Jupiter 8, RX100 IV