Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Jan 2009 (Tuesday) 09:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Not diggin' the 35L...

 
darktiger
Goldmember
1,944 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jan 13, 2009 09:53 |  #16

I use my 35L a lot more than my 50 or 85. I think on the 5D/5DmkII it is a very good focal length. 24 is to wide, unless I am shooting landscapes.


My Flickr (external link)
My Gear
My Zenfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Jan 13, 2009 09:57 |  #17

Cool, so the conclusion is that Perry is insane and that I made a good choice. Good. I feel better :)


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Jan 13, 2009 09:57 |  #18

I much prefer shooting with a 50mm 85mm combo than anything with a 35mm. It's all personal preference. Just use what feels right for you, and it sounds like it's the 50mm. Have you considered the sigma 50 1.4? Better than the canon, and at least it doesn't have focus shift.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:02 |  #19

picturecrazy wrote in post #7066846 (external link)
I much prefer shooting with a 50mm 85mm combo than anything with a 35mm. It's all personal preference. Just use what feels right for you, and it sounds like it's the 50mm. Have you considered the sigma 50 1.4? Better than the canon, and at least it doesn't have focus shift.

Must be the Edmontonian blood we both have - I used to carry the 28 1.8, 50 1.4, and 85 1.8 around and I hardly ever used the 28 1.8 - the 85 and 50 did almost all of the work and I really did like the combo. I have definitely considered the Sigma, but I don't know if I wanna go down that route since I haven't heard too much about that lens, and the front element is so huge, but it might be an option.

Another thing is I hate having too many lenses since I fly around a lot, so I'm a little averse to just adding another 50mm prime to the bag.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thatkatmat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,342 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 205
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:02 |  #20

I own and love the 35L, but for a walkaround I prefer 50mm. It really comes down to what you're comfortable with. My search for a really great 50mm AF lens went through 3 50L's, 2 EF 50/1.4's and 2 EX 50/1.4's. At the moment, my EX 50/1.4 is on my 5DmkII and I'm loving it. It has no focus issues that I can't take care of with micro-adjustment. I've been refering to my EX as my EX 50/1.4L (It's REALLY great, does what it's supposed to do, I love it. So far it bests all the 50's I've used. But the only problem is there are aparently many copies that shift/FF and BF at odd FL's so unless you have microadjust I can't reccomend it.
Anyways, back to the 35L, for me, it's much nicer on a 1.3 or 1.6 crop.....But I prefer the 50mm FOV.


My Flickr (external link)
Stuff
"Never rat on your friends and always keep your mouth shut." -Jimmy Conway
a9, 12-24/4G, 24-70/2.8GM, 100-400GM, 25/2 Batis, 55/1.8ZA, 85 /1.8FE, 85LmkII, 135L...a6300,10-18/4, 16-50PZ, 18-105PZ

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:10 |  #21

I'm with you there, I absolutely adore the 50mm focal length. I really wanna try a 50L now :p, but if I'm just gonna add another lens to the bag, I might have to go with the 50 1.4 since it's so small and compact, unlike the Sigma and Canon L. If I went either of those routes I think I might have to get rid of the 35L.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DL.Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,456 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: NYC
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:11 |  #22

I think you're the first person to hate the FL of the 35L on a 5D lol.

I want one so bad, sell it to me =)


- Dan
Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:14 |  #23

I'm just curious why you're not going to return it. If it's going to just sit in your bag, then why take the hit of depreciation on it? You could easily get the 28 1.8 and Sigma 50/Canon 1.4 for the price of the 35L, and the 28 1.8 would be there for when you need it for those full body portrait shots, and you'd have the Sigma or Canon 50 as a walk around


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:14 |  #24

DL.Photography wrote in post #7066928 (external link)
I think you're the first person to hate the FL of the 35L on a 5D lol.

I don't hate it. I'm just not lovin' it, and for the money, I should be loving it. I think it might be time to re-buy the ol' 50 1.4...I'll deal with the 35L's fate later. Who knows, I might grow to love it, but what I do know is that I really miss 50mm. But it might be pointless to have both 35mm and 50mm given that I have the two bodies. Ack. Such a conundrum.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:14 as a reply to  @ DL.Photography's post |  #25

I love my 35L as well, but find myself grabbing my 50L more b/c it's just a FL that I am more comfy with. (Shift and everything;))

As for consistency, well, no contest. 35L all the way. It has none of that shift problem that plagues the 50L!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:16 |  #26

TaDa wrote in post #7066939 (external link)
I'm just curious why you're not going to return it. If it's going to just sit in your bag, then why take the hit of depreciation on it? You could easily get the 28 1.8 and Sigma 50/Canon 1.4 for the price of the 35L, and the 28 1.8 would be there for when you need it for those full body portrait shots, and you'd have the Sigma or Canon 50 as a walk around

Because it's a pretty good lens :p and like I said, I really do like carrying it with the 85L. I don't know - I've been waiting so long for this damn lens that if I return it I might regret it. Maybe I will. Hmm...

Oh and no 28 1.8, I very rarely used that lens (even though when I did I really liked it) - 17-40L did all the work, I rarely need that wide in low light.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:20 |  #27

nicksan wrote in post #7066943 (external link)
I love my 35L as well, but find myself grabbing my 50L more b/c it's just a FL that I am more comfy with. (Shift and everything;))

As for consistency, well, no contest. 35L all the way. It has none of that shift problem that plagues the 50L!

35, 50, 85, 200 - you likin' that lineup of primes? No redundancy with the two bodies? (I was hoping to hear from you since you also have a 5D + 1.3crop body and the same prime focal lengths).

Might be 50 1.4 time then, I'll settle with having inferior 50mm, 200mm primes, and an inferior 1.3x body to you Nick :lol:.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:36 |  #28

Ok so I've decided that I'm going to do one of two things:

a) Take the 35L back to the store, play with a 50L, if I like it, I will exchange the lens and pay the difference (though they charge a 15% restocking fee :confused: ) or just get a refund. OR
b) Buy a used 50 1.4 tomorrow and keep the 35L. I've found a seller, he's a got a hood, the price is good.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
keener
Senior Member
Avatar
537 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:48 |  #29

This was an interesting read, as I'm currently debating the 35L. At first I thought I would love this FL and had the money all ready to go. Then I decided to test it out so I put my 24-70 at 35mm and shot that for a couple of days. It was ok. I did a little more testing and discovered that if I take one step forward, it turns into 50mm, and one and a half steps back, it turns into a 24mm. In the end, I think I just have to take the plunge and try it out and see how well it works in the real world. It does at times feel a bit wide for me on my 5D2 as well. I tend to favour the 50-85 range.


Gear List | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 13, 2009 10:49 |  #30

I was in a similar position to you - I found the 35L to be too wide but I wasn't a huge fan of the 50 1.4. The 50L was perfect for me (and there definitely is a noticeable difference between 50mm and 85mm) - give it a try.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,845 views & 0 likes for this thread, 59 members have posted to it.
Not diggin' the 35L...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1030 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.