ngn8dogg wrote in post #7077898
Do you like your sig better then the canon?
Do you like your sig better then the canon?
No. at this point i prefer the canon for its reliable focus. WRT to the original topic though, the sig has more pleasing bokeh.
datadump Goldmember  1,932 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Canada More info | Jan 15, 2009 07:01 | #31 ngn8dogg wrote in post #7077898 Do you like your sig better then the canon? No. at this point i prefer the canon for its reliable focus. WRT to the original topic though, the sig has more pleasing bokeh. datadump
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AngryCorgi -Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion  11,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA... More info | Jan 15, 2009 08:10 | #32 perryge wrote in post #7076955 Yes, yes it does have crappy bokeh. The article was pretty good. And I totally agree with the above two posters - people need to stop confusing DOF with bokeh. No doubt. I saw a cheesy youtube vid yesterday where the "reviewer" stated that the tamron 70-200/2.8 "gives really highest bokeh". I had to do a double take...he actually expressed a trait for bokeh I'd never heard --- "high". AngryCorgi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2125 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
