Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Jan 2009 (Friday) 20:06
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Is the 200/2 totally inferior to the 70-200/4 ?"
Yes. The 200/2 is really bad and should cost less than the 70-200/4..
41
48.8%
No. Keep 200/2 price high.
43
51.2%

84 voters, 84 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is 200L/2 totally inferior to the 70-200/4 ?

 
kirradude1025
Member
222 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jan 17, 2009 19:50 |  #61

OMG THIS IS SUCH A FUNNY JOKE...NOT. Lets try to keep this ridiculous stuff off of here. This is Nikon behavior.


2 x EOS-1 D Mark II; EOS 5D; EOS 40D with BG-E2N
l 85mm f1.8 USM l 50mm f1.4 USM l 28mm f1.8 USM l 70-200 f2.8L IS USM l 17-40 f4L l
Speedlite 430EX l 1.4x TC l Tiffen Filters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eb314
Senior Member
314 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jan 17, 2009 19:58 |  #62

TheGreatDivorce wrote in post #7096877 (external link)
this thread is such a huge waste of bandwidth.

I know, I'm so pissed. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going back to the "is the 17-55 REALLY worth it?" threads.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrianMC
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Toronto, CA
     
Jan 17, 2009 20:14 as a reply to  @ eb314's post |  #63

But I do love the 200 f2 :D


Brian
1DS III / 2x 5DII
24L II / 35L / 16-35L II / 45 TS-E / 50L / 50 1.4 / 85L II / 135L / 70-200L IS / 100 2.8 Macro / 200L 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 407
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
     
Jan 17, 2009 21:01 |  #64

kirradude1025 wrote in post #7099286 (external link)
OMG THIS IS SUCH A FUNNY JOKE...NOT. Lets try to keep this ridiculous stuff off of here. This is Nikon behavior.

I'm sorry for that. Could not resist.
But what do you mean by "This is Nikon behavior" ?
_______________
D3, 17-35 2.8D AFS, 24-70 2.8G AFS, 70-200 2.8G AFS


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Jan 17, 2009 21:21 |  #65

CheshireCat wrote in post #7099682 (external link)
But what do you mean by "This is Nikon behavior" ?
_______________
D3, 14-24 2.8G AFS, 24-70 2.8G AFS, 70-200 2.8G AFS


:lol::lol::lol:


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,533 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2008
     
Jan 17, 2009 21:28 as a reply to  @ post 7098835 |  #66

would someone please wake me up when this is over?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jan 17, 2009 21:55 |  #67

I love this thread, we need to have fun with this stuff or what is the point.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,966 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13412
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Jan 17, 2009 21:58 |  #68

nicksan wrote in post #7098835 (external link)
You mean all 3 of us actual owners? :lol:

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

And Nick if he were to spend some quality time with one he'd probably be an owner too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,396 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
Is 200L/2 totally inferior to the 70-200/4 ?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1073 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.