Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 19 Jan 2009 (Monday) 10:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Film vs. Digital Enlargements

 
shane_c
Senior Member
726 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
     
Jan 19, 2009 10:33 |  #1

Has anyone had any enlargements done from film lately? I had an 8x10 done from 35mm film (Canon Rebel SLR) on the weekend and was not impressed. It looked very dull and tired compared to any I've had done from my digital SLR. Then I started thinking that the last few enlargements I've had done have been the same going back a few years now. Do you think photo labs developing film has become a lost art? Or is digital a much better starting point when doing an enlargement?


Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
G1X MK2, G15
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jan 19, 2009 11:18 |  #2

Photo lab can do a bad job of quality control, no doubt about that. But it also could be the extended range of the C print makes it look flat to you. Depends a lot on subject and lighting as well. Many people prefer a good color print from negative. I really like the zip and pop of a digital print and I have no apologies.


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jan 19, 2009 11:36 |  #3

shane_c wrote in post #7109773 (external link)
Has anyone had any enlargements done from film lately? I had an 8x10 done from 35mm film (Canon Rebel SLR) on the weekend and was not impressed. It looked very dull and tired compared to any I've had done from my digital SLR. Then I started thinking that the last few enlargements I've had done have been the same going back a few years now. Do you think photo labs developing film has become a lost art? Or is digital a much better starting point when doing an enlargement?

I presume you had "standard" prints made from the same film. How did they look compared to the 8x10s?


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shane_c
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
726 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
     
Jan 19, 2009 12:25 |  #4

SkipD wrote in post #7110194 (external link)
I presume you had "standard" prints made from the same film. How did they look compared to the 8x10s?

Yes, I had a 4x6 done back in 2001 and it looked very nice. I should also add that the film enlargements I've had done the last couple years have been done at different labs.


Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
G1X MK2, G15
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tstowe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,194 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
     
Jan 20, 2009 06:53 |  #5

"labs" aren't what they used to be.


www.ToddStowe.com (external link)
www.TheTalon.SmugMug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jan 24, 2009 08:57 |  #6

It all depends on how good the exposure (the overall light that was captured and how, i.e. camera shake, focus quality, shutter speed) was and where you take it.

Any place to take a film negative to have a reprint or enlargement made, will digitally scan your negative and also digitally print it. Most machines are automated without much personal adjustment made by a skilled worker.

I've had 20x30 inch enlargments made from 100 speed film that I scanned myself at home on my film scanner and sent to a printer that specilizes in larger parints.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,117 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Film vs. Digital Enlargements
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1368 guests, 194 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.