Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 19 Jan 2009 (Monday) 19:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Alien Bees users check in!

 
this thread is locked
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Dec 04, 2009 12:51 |  #4111

FJ LOVE wrote in post #9134932 (external link)
i have an avenger d600 too , very strong boom but you'll need a good stand under it.

Absolutely. You can't use standard aluminum stands with this boom. You need a stand that is stable, has a wide foot print and depending on how far you plan on extending the boom you'll need a sandbag or weight on the end of the boom and/or the base of the light stand.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Dec 04, 2009 12:52 |  #4112

seanzky wrote in post #9134898 (external link)
As for the Avenger D600, I can't believe it only costs $5 more than the Norman but can hold so much more weight. I'm going to open it up right now. Hehe. I can't wait to get home and try it.

UPDATE: The hook on the boom is upside down! -.-;

UPDATE, UPDATE: I had the grip upside down! LOL!!!

Dohh!!


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Dec 04, 2009 12:54 |  #4113
bannedPermanent ban

seanzky wrote in post #9134865 (external link)
How much of a difference would there be between a silver PLM with a front diffuser and a white PLM with a black cover and front diffuser?

Contrast, hard light versus soft light. I often use the latter, as most of what I do lately is families and soft light is a lot more appealing than contrasty/hard light.

But I don't think the front diffuser fits on the silver umbrella...at least it doesn't with mine...they should have included instructions with it, though, because it took me a while to figure out how to properly mount and use these


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Dec 04, 2009 12:55 |  #4114

seanzky wrote in post #9134865 (external link)
How much of a difference would there be between a silver PLM with a front diffuser and a white PLM with a black cover and front diffuser?

Even though you're adding diffusion material to the front, the silver will still produce a more specular quality of light. It will be slightly more directional with slightly higher contrast. If you're shooting people that have oily spots of skin or looking at catch lights you'll see the difference. The catch lights and the eyes will pop more. Any reflection from the subject will be more pronounced with the silver interior.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seanzky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,888 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: TX
     
Dec 04, 2009 12:57 |  #4115

Kyle is raaddd wrote in post #9134976 (external link)
There would be a difference for sure, all though I am no master on PLM's (I've never even used one.

I myself would rather have the one on the far right:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Because it would act more like a softbox/octabox/quintu​plabox (LOL) than an umbrella.

Maybe you should wait for Pham or someone with more knowledge on the subject before you make a decision though.

P.S. I am having another automotive shoot today.

EDIT: If anything ever goes south with my AB boom, I'll definitely get the Avenger :)

Kyle, I highly, highly recommend this Avenger. It's the cheapest boom on B&H that can handle this kind of weight. As long as you have a stand that can hold this weight (like this: http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Boom.html#spec​ifications (external link)) and proper counter weight, I wouldn't worry about my Bee and BD going anywhere.

As for the PLM, yup, I'm aiming for the one on the far right, too --the silver PLM with front diffusion panel. I just wanted to make sure.

Right now I have the large softbox (for sale). I thought of getting the foldable version to replace it but then I realized that the foldable octabox isn't that much more. And a minute later I realize that the PLM is cheaper and more efficient than the softbox and octabox. So now I'm trying to figure out which PLM but I guess it'll be the "option 1" from my previous post.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seanzky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,888 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: TX
     
Dec 04, 2009 12:58 |  #4116

Karl Johnston wrote in post #9135018 (external link)
Contrast, hard light versus soft light. I often use the latter, as most of what I do lately is families and soft light is a lot more appealing than contrasty/hard light.

But I don't think the front diffuser fits on the silver umbrella...at least it doesn't with mine...they should have included instructions with it, though, because it took me a while to figure out how to properly mount and use these

Isn't the front diffusion panel specifically for the silver umbrella?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:00 |  #4117
bannedPermanent ban

Not sure..but if you find out tell me how to put it on :lol: i have the whole kit of PLM gear


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seanzky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,888 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: TX
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:01 |  #4118

TMR Design wrote in post #9135020 (external link)
Even though you're adding diffusion material to the front, the silver will still produce a more specular quality of light. It will be slightly more directional with slightly higher contrast. If you're shooting people that have oily spots of skin or looking at catch lights you'll see the difference. The catch lights and the eyes will pop more. Any reflection from the subject will be more pronounced with the silver interior.

So it sounds like I should get the silver first then. I will end up with both but I think I need what you describe above more right now. I have other shoot-through umbrellas if I need softer light in the meantime.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kyle ­ is ­ raaddd
Senior Member
Avatar
529 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Marble Falls, Tx
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:02 |  #4119

seanzky wrote in post #9135033 (external link)
Kyle, I highly, highly recommend this Avenger. It's the cheapest boom on B&H that can handle this kind of weight. As long as you have a stand that can hold this weight (like this: http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Boom.html#spec​ifications (external link)) and proper counter weight, I wouldn't worry about my Bee and BD going anywhere.

As for the PLM, yup, I'm aiming for the one on the far right, too --the silver PLM with front diffusion panel. I just wanted to make sure.

Right now I have the large softbox (for sale). I thought of getting the foldable version to replace it but then I realized that the foldable octabox isn't that much more. And a minute later I realize that the PLM is cheaper and more efficient than the softbox and octabox. So now I'm trying to figure out which PLM but I guess it'll be the "option 1" from my previous post.

I have the 13' HD light stand from Paul C. Buff. Although I've never had a problem with booming my beauty dish very high and far out, I'll definitely keep that in mind.

Thanks :)
I hope you find what you want, and it suits your needs!!!


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seanzky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,888 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: TX
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:03 |  #4120

Karl Johnston wrote in post #9135058 (external link)
Not sure..but if you find out tell me how to put it on :lol: i have the whole kit of PLM gear

Have you tried putting the tip covers on first before opening up the umbrella? I don't know. I'm speculating at this point. Better ask the other guys here. Someone has to know if the PLMs are always on backorder. Lol.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:05 |  #4121
bannedPermanent ban

http://alienbees.com/p​lm.html (external link)

They added this section fairly recently, i think I know what i'm doing now :lol:


It can be used with both, I was wrong. Though I don't think it fitted very well when I tried it on the silver as opposed to the white. Often I have trouble with it falling off, in fact. I don't often use the black spill kill cover, though I suppose I really should.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

White Front Diffusion Fabric: Converts the PLM into a soft, high-output softbox when used with the black/silver umbrella. When used with the white umbrella and Black Outer Cover, it produces a very soft, wide-angle softbox. Available in 86”, 64”, and 42” sizes.

Not sure if these examples are good enough or not but...here is the white PLM with black spill kill cover on the back:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 503 | MIME changed to 'text/html'
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 503 | MIME changed to 'text/html'

And on the right here is a white PLM with NO black spill kill cover on the back:

Same backdrop ...though I suppose with the different shoot it's not really a comprehensive enough test. I can see it a little bit but only because they're mine. Very soft on the left, and a bit more contrasty/directional on the right..Sorry if they're not good enough :\ Both are just the single light

Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seanzky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,888 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: TX
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:08 |  #4122

Kyle is raaddd wrote in post #9135076 (external link)
I have the 13' HD light stand from Paul C. Buff. Although I've never had a problem with booming my beauty dish very high and far out, I'll definitely keep that in mind.

Thanks :)
I hope you find what you want, and it suits your needs!!!

That's right! I forgot you've mentioned here somewhere that you had the AB HD 13-footer. I think that can hold this boom but because of the footprint of that stand maybe it's best to put some weight on the stand as well as counterweight on the boom.

All I have right now is my LumoPro 8' AC (non-HD) stand. I'm too scared to even extend one segment. Lol.

And thanks! I'll end up buying a proper HD stand for this boom. It's about time I own one anyway.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kyle ­ is ­ raaddd
Senior Member
Avatar
529 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Marble Falls, Tx
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:09 |  #4123

seanzky wrote in post #9135120 (external link)
That's right! I forgot you've mentioned here somewhere that you had the AB HD 13-footer. I think that can hold this boom but because of the footprint of that stand maybe it's best to put some weight on the stand as well as counterweight on the boom.

All I have right now is my LumoPro 8' AC (non-HD) stand. I'm too scared to even extend one segment. Lol.

And thanks! I'll end up buying a proper HD stand for this boom. It's about time I own one anyway.

Hopefully by the time my boom breaks or something, I'll have my vagabond, so I could put that at the base of the stand :)

Yes, HD stand FTW!!


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seanzky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,888 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: TX
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:11 |  #4124

Karl Johnston wrote in post #9135102 (external link)
Though I don't think it fitted very well when I tried it on the silver as opposed to the white. Often I have trouble with it falling off, in fact.

I have a feeling I, too, will learn this the hard way.

Do you have the non-B&W version of photo #2? I'm curious because I like the softness on the first one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DerekW
Goldmember
Avatar
1,211 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Sarnia Ontario Canada
     
Dec 04, 2009 13:18 |  #4125

TMR Design wrote in post #9134998 (external link)
Absolutely. You can't use standard aluminum stands with this boom. You need a stand that is stable, has a wide foot print and depending on how far you plan on extending the boom you'll need a sandbag or weight on the end of the boom and/or the base of the light stand.


This is where I',m at now. I have a reasonable boom, But my stands are weak. I've been looking and can't decide which way to go, there's so many choices. I'm assuming steel is the way to go. I've heard people say to not use a C stand, others do.
I'll take any recommendations for a nice heavy duty stand without going too crazy on price




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,912,504 views & 0 likes for this thread, 649 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Alien Bees users check in!
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1042 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.