Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 21 Jan 2009 (Wednesday) 18:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Brothers wedding

 
unlimited6986
Senior Member
866 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 21, 2009 18:50 |  #1

I wasnt the Photographer (Was the best man). But my bro told me to bring my gear and take some pics. Heres some of the bride dancing. Let me know what you think.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3353/3216019817_b181f317e0.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3337/3216019259_c9ed5c1b66.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3437/3216020741_171fb232a2.jpg


Also how do you get it so the shadow isn't so visible? I bounced the off the ceiling and sometimes off the side walls.

Thanks for looking



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jan 21, 2009 20:55 |  #2

They look technically good, did you have the bounce card / catch-light piece pulled out or the stofen type diffuser on? that's the only thing I could think of that affected your shadows.

To get less profound shadows, bounce backward behind you a little bit, that way you'll get enough fill & a more even light source.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
unlimited6986
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
866 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 21, 2009 20:58 |  #3

Yea i had a stofen on my 580ex. I think i might have accidentally had it titled foward just a bit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
collierportraits
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, USA
     
Jan 21, 2009 21:28 |  #4

To get the shadow less visible, increase your exposure so that the flash will be closer to the ambient light (which will make it less visible) So, in other words, if you're shooting at a 100th of a second, increase your exposure to a 30th of a second, which will then require less flash to light the subject and it will be closer to the ambient light. Sorry, bad explanation, but does that make sense?


5D3 | 16-35L | 45 TS-E | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L | 24-70L | 70-200 II L | 580s | Zero, TT & Crumplers | and an X100! :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Svetlana
Goldmember
Avatar
3,357 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Jan 21, 2009 23:14 |  #5

Collieportraits, could you please explain that again? I can sort of understand the concept but not quite..???


Canon 7D, 5Dmk2, 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, Canon 50 1.2L, 35 1.4L, 85 1.8, Canon 16-35L, Canon 100 2.8L IS Macro, Speedlight 580EX II x 2, 430 EX, enthusiasm.:D http://svetlanayanova.​com/ (external link)

Join me on Facebook (external link)! :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpistone
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
     
Jan 21, 2009 23:23 |  #6

What he's saying is that if you change your exposure from, say, 1/100 to 1/30, you have the same flash (the whole burst of flash is within both of those exposures) but more ambient light, so the shadows won't be as noticed. But doing that will essentially make your flash less effective, it'll look more like you just used ambient light for the shot.

I'd suggest a diffuser, or get a way to put your flash off-camera.


-Matt
40D | 10-22mm | 17-85mm IS | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 f4 | 100mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jan 21, 2009 23:28 |  #7

What he meant was balancing the ambient with flash to be as close to even as possible.

To each his own style, but I find that under expose the ambient half a stop or full stop helps with a more dramatic shot of a dance between couples, and really reduces the shadows if there's any.

Don't mean to steal your thread, but here's what I mean by under exposing the ambient a bit and add flash to fill in to pop out the subject(s) & make it look a bit more dramatic. EXIF is intact if you want to peek at the tech info. Lemme know if you want me to take off the image.

Father & daughter dance.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
unlimited6986
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
866 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 22, 2009 11:18 |  #8

Ok i no exactly what you guys are saying. I just gotta bump the SS to like 1/30 1/50. I was the best man so i couldnt take my flashes Off Camera. Just had to gran my camera and flash and shoot quick.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jan 22, 2009 12:12 |  #9

unlimited6986 wrote in post #7162952 (external link)
Ok i no exactly what you guys are saying. I just gotta bump the SS to like 1/30 1/50. I was the best man so i couldnt take my flashes Off Camera. Just had to gran my camera and flash and shoot quick.

Be careful not to bring your shutter down too much or you'll risk introduce motion blur. I normally keep my shutter anywhere from 1/40 ~ 1/60 and up with flash and bump up the ISO instead.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
collierportraits
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, USA
     
Jan 22, 2009 13:04 |  #10

Well, actually Viet, it depends upon how much ambient light there is. Sometimes when ambient light is lower, the flash will actually freeze the motion anyway, but you're right, you do need to be careful of that. When there is enough ambient light (see below) you'll get some blur, plus the flash 'stops' the action. In that case, ambient 'blur' adds to the image a little. Here's a father/daughter dance shot at 1/30th of a second at f4, ISO 400. There is certainly some ambient blur but the father/daughter are really sharp. But you get the sense of movement... see his foot. This is shot flash on camera bounced. (Probably 580 set to fire at about -1/3 or -2/3 flash exposure - ETTL)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


5D3 | 16-35L | 45 TS-E | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L | 24-70L | 70-200 II L | 580s | Zero, TT & Crumplers | and an X100! :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rodddy
Senior Member
Avatar
428 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Waterford, Ontario, Canada
     
Jan 28, 2009 12:25 |  #11

Viet,
Thats a great image. Can you comment a little more on your setting. Did you bounce flash, dial down the flash etc.?

Thanks, Rodney




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jan 28, 2009 13:13 |  #12

rodddy wrote in post #7205982 (external link)
Viet,
Thats a great image. Can you comment a little more on your setting. Did you bounce flash, dial down the flash etc.?

Thanks, Rodney

Rodney,

Thanks, and I'd like to answer your question here rather than PM in hopes that it'll help someone else as well.

I shoot at least 90% of my weddings in manual (both camera & flash). I believe that shot was done at 1/4 power of the Sigma 500DG flash (bought off here on the forum). I normally leave my flash bounce behind me a bit in case people have deep eye sockets so I can have a proper fill in them. The most frequently made mistake that new shooters have is bounce straight up or in front of them, this is fine if the subjects don't have deep eye sockets or if you need to shoot further from a distance.

I always try to leave my shots with the EXIF info intact so others can see & maybe learn from them. You just need an EXIF viewer to see it. I use Firefox and they have this extension  (external link)to do just that.

Here's the EXIF copied from that one image:

Camera Make: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS 5D
Image Date: 2009:01:17 16:18:15
Flash Used: Yes (Manual)
Focal Length: 135.0mm
CCD Width: 6.58mm
Exposure Time: 0.0063 s (1/160)
Aperture: f/2.0
ISO equiv: 1000
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rodddy
Senior Member
Avatar
428 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Waterford, Ontario, Canada
     
Jan 28, 2009 17:48 |  #13

Thanks Viet I'll be keeping this in mind on my next wedding. 1/160 shutter, it must have been pretty well lit even at 1000 ISO f2.0




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randplaty
Senior Member
Avatar
324 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Jan 28, 2009 18:58 |  #14

Good shots, I would definitely bounce the flash to the side (not off the ceiling) ... especially in that room.


San Diego Wedding Photography - Orange Turtle Photography | Feel In Color (external link)
Orange Turtle Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,960 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Brothers wedding
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1376 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.