1D and PW... a match made in heaven
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
needless to say I'm excited I spent my $$$ wisely

jbergdoll Goldmember 1,176 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Tempe, AZ More info | Jan 21, 2009 19:26 | #1 Permanent ban1D and PW... a match made in heaven
needless to say I'm excited I spent my $$$ wisely ![]() -Joseph
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jan 21, 2009 22:39 | #2 Interesting! At what shutter speed do you see the shutter creep in? Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tenoverthenose Senior Member 822 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Yosemite, Ca More info | Jan 21, 2009 23:00 | #3 Im seriously tempted to get a 1D just for that reason. And I could stop carrying around my AB for outdoor shots. www.patrickpike.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermes Goldmember 2,375 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Jan 21, 2009 23:03 | #4 tim wrote in post #7159886 Interesting! At what shutter speed do you see the shutter creep in? As I understand the 1D uses an electronic shutter at these speeds so... never
LOG IN TO REPLY |
40Dude6aedyk Goldmember 1,064 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | Hey, where's the control experiment? Maybe skyports, cybersyncs, cactus, etc all can sync at 1/1000th? Canon 40D; Canon 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, 85 mm f/1.8; 580EX II; Sigma EF-530 DG Super; CyberSyncs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Jan 21, 2009 23:22 | #6 Hermes wrote in post #7160061 As I understand the 1D uses an electronic shutter at these speeds so... never ![]() Not so. I know someone (PacAce?) did some experimenting with a G series camera. The image just gets gradually darker as shutter speed increases past the point where it's catching the full duration of the flash. 40Dude6aedyk wrote in post #7160084 Hey, where's the control experiment? Maybe skyports, cybersyncs, cactus, etc all can sync at 1/1000th? Credible tests I have seen, using split images lit partially by PC cord flash and partially by the radio system being tested, seem to reveal that the Skyports are a bit slower. The Cactus units are all over the map. I haven't seen similar tests done with Cybersyncs. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermes Goldmember 2,375 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Jan 21, 2009 23:30 | #7 Curtis N wrote in post #7160183 Not so. I know someone (PacAce?) did some experimenting with a G series camera. The image just gets gradually darker as shutter speed increases past the point where it's catching the full duration of the flash.Credible tests I have seen, using split images lit partially by PC cord flash and partially by the radio system being tested, seem to reveal that the Skyports are a bit slower. The Cactus units are all over the map. I haven't seen similar tests done with Cybersyncs. Thats's the point I was making, you won't see shutter creep (in the traditional sense). As for when the frame begins to darken, I found it to be around 1/1000 with a G9 and studio strobes but I certainly got to 1/1000 with skyports and no problems. I suspect that if I was using hotshoe flashes I could have got it shorter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
XterraJohn Senior Member 513 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Jan 21, 2009 23:54 | #8 Hermes wrote in post #7160061 As I understand the 1D uses an electronic shutter at these speeds so... never ![]()
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2009 23:54 | #9 Permanent bantim wrote in post #7159886 Interesting! At what shutter speed do you see the shutter creep in? You don't. 1D shutter only opens at 1/500 max, everything faster than that is done by turning the CCD on then off. at 1/1250 it goes mostly black because it's not long enough for the flash duration, but you can see the flashtubes glowing haha. XterraJohn wrote in post #7160360 Just the original 1D, or all 1D-series cameras? Also, why don't all cameras use an electronic shutter. What is the down side? Original 1D is the only Canon camera that you can do this with. On Noinks, however, both the D40 and the D70/D70s can sync high. -Joseph
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2009 23:58 | #10 Permanent ban40Dude6aedyk wrote in post #7160084 Hey, where's the control experiment? Maybe skyports, cybersyncs, cactus, etc all can sync at 1/1000th? Cactus are so terribly unreliable. I could sometimes sync at 1/640, and then other days I'd be limited to 1/160. There's a reason why they're only $22... they suck. I could only get 1/640 indoors and within 20 feet. For around 2 weeks straight I could consistently hit 1/400. Never got to 1/500 consistently, though. -Joseph
LOG IN TO REPLY |
baekgaard Junior Member 23 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jan 22, 2009 07:35 | #11 Curtis N wrote in post #7160183 Credible tests I have seen, using split images lit partially by PC cord flash and partially by the radio system being tested, seem to reveal that the Skyports are a bit slower. I have done some on-camera-dummified-flash vs Skyports testing on a Nikon D70, which also has an electronic shutter. They sync reliably always at 1/800th, and (unless the batteries are worn down) also at 1/1000th, apparently without any impact on the exposure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
epatt250 Senior Member 769 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Central, Arkansas More info | Jan 22, 2009 10:12 | #12 I had similar results with my cactus triggers. Last summer I could sync at 1/320 all day with no problems. Now, depending on what day I fire them up I get between 1/20 and 1/60th to sync. Not good. I have changed all the batteries too. Gear- Why do you care? If my image is good it's good, if it sucks it sucks. It's most likely my own fault.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
baekgaard Junior Member 23 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jan 22, 2009 14:40 | #13 baekgaard wrote in post #7161806 So the PWs are, from what I have seen and been able to determine, faster than the Skyports, but not by an order of magnitude. I would be able to measure the Skyports (have and use those), but as I don't have any PWs I cannot first-hand verify those. I just re-did my testing. The results show that my two Skyports add a sync-delay of 0.91 mS (~1/1100th of a second), with an uncertainty of around +/-0.01mS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
baekgaard Junior Member 23 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jan 22, 2009 17:09 | #14 baekgaard wrote in post #7164237 I just re-did my testing. The results show that my two Skyports add a sync-delay of 0.91 mS (~1/1100th of a second), with an uncertainty of around +/-0.01mS. ... found a couple of images in another thread. Using these made it possible for me to do a crude estimate of the PW sync-delay to be around 0.47 mS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 22, 2009 17:50 | #15 Permanent banepatt250 wrote in post #7162596 I had similar results with my cactus triggers. Last summer I could sync at 1/320 all day with no problems. Now, depending on what day I fire them up I get between 1/20 and 1/60th to sync. Not good. I have changed all the batteries too. Yep, I dropped $15 on new batteries and that did absolutely nothing. -Joseph
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1160 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||