You are welcome Permie...as a late comer into the convo regarding your switch over, do you mind my asking what made you decide to switch?

Togra4 "....tragic, really. " 1,072 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Jan 23, 2009 13:24 | #301 You are welcome Permie...as a late comer into the convo regarding your switch over, do you mind my asking what made you decide to switch? Tracy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Permagrin High Priestess of all I survey 77,915 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2006 Location: day dreamin' More info | Jan 23, 2009 13:36 | #303 Togra4 wrote in post #7171359 You are welcome Permie...as a late comer into the convo regarding your switch over, do you mind my asking what made you decide to switch? well, I hope I won't bore you with a long story (I'll try to be concise). .. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Permagrin High Priestess of all I survey 77,915 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2006 Location: day dreamin' More info | Jan 23, 2009 13:38 | #304 Harm wrote in post #7171423 Kona looks so cute in those shots! thanks Harm. .. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Togra4 "....tragic, really. " 1,072 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Jan 23, 2009 13:40 | #305 I see, I see. That is one heck of an adjustment. I wish you the very best. I know you will conquer the obstacles! Tracy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Permagrin High Priestess of all I survey 77,915 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2006 Location: day dreamin' More info | One thing I miss (it's silly) is being able to talk gear here. Mostly because I know that the people on this thread are knowledgeable and I don't have to weed through the fanboy-ism of other forums or threads. I could just ask a question and someone here would have the answer. Because no one shoots nikon (which I suppose is normal for a canon only forum :lol .. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Belmondo Cream of the Crop 42,735 posts Likes: 15 Joined Jul 2003 Location: 92210 More info | Jan 23, 2009 14:23 | #307 Permagrin wrote in post #7171517 One thing I miss (it's silly) is being able to talk gear here. Mostly because I know that the people on this thread are knowledgeable and I don't have to weed through the fanboy-ism of other forums or threads. I could just ask a question and someone here would have the answer. Because no one shoots nikon (which I suppose is normal for a canon only forum :lol I have no one I trust to ask questions too. Research takes a lot longer (due to the weeding) and I keep hoping I'm not making mistakes.Well, you should have thought of that sooner, young lady. I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poppieguy I'm Sid. Don't be hatin' my hats. 13,870 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Oregon More info | Jan 23, 2009 14:58 | #308 aussieskier wrote in post #7170435 I would get the 70-200 IS F4. It isn't the best lens per se for all your work, but it will work just fine. You can always upgrade to the 2.8 when you are able to. If you could squeeze in a 85 1.8 for some portraits it would be worthwhile. The 50 will be useless, I don't trust mine to accurately focus in critical situations wide open. These were with my 70-200 f4 just for some examples. Nice photos Riley, especially the one of Bailey! Nice looking tongue there young lady. Lightstream wrote in post #7171262 Shots look OK.. maybe it is the pixel peepers getting too carried away. We all know how they end up ![]() There is basically only one transition left for my setup - I have decided at some point to give up crop cameras. I find that the x0D series cameras have just not delivered the reliability I need, they always seem to be experiencing one issue or another (usually an ERRxx issue), whereas the 5D just keeps on ticking. It ain't called the cookie cutter for nothing. Even for my MBIF, the 5D2 is expected to yield massive pixels for cropping manually in LR anyway. Oh yeah, this post brought to you by the aluminium 13" Macbook. It has a superb display: suddenly all my photos look SO much better than before! I have a 24" iMac and 5D/24-105. Couldn't be happier. Do you find the 13" screen large enough for pp, or do you use a monitor? belmondo wrote in post #7171748 Well, you should have thought of that sooner, young lady. I'm in an Apple Store in San Diego. Your weather here sucks, John. I see I have a lot of work to do here. Catch you all later. Get em all tuned to potn Chief!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Togra4 "....tragic, really. " 1,072 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Jan 23, 2009 15:04 | #309 hehe, Mike. Tracy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2009 15:08 | #310 poppie guy wrote in post #7171977 Do you find the 13" screen large enough for pp, or do you use a monitor? I have a small laptop screen - not even a macbook pro !! I would like to see how some of my shots look on a decent monitor!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ibdb TD's worst nightmare! 6,484 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Puyallup -- Don't worry. Nobody else can pronounce it either. More info | Moooooo, all. Claire wrote in post #7167623 Short recap of my life... Doesn't sound like the best start to 2009. Good thing it's behind you and you're moving forward. Oooooohhhh. . . purty change. . . Woolburr wrote in post #7169843 For a portrait lens...I'd have to go with the 85 f/1.8 for the budget conscious. Probably one of the best bang for the buck lenses in the Canon line-up....my second choice would probably be the 100 macro....a bit slow to focus...but delightful bokeh and razor sharp. 85 f/1.8 is a great lens. I don't use it as much as I wish I did, because whenever I do get it out I just love the results it gives me. Togra4 wrote in post #7169913 I did read up on that one. It was on my possibilities list for the $600...I am glad I was not wrong in putting it there. ![]() ... Plus I hear the 85 1.8 is good for Basketball...i sure would be getting a big bang for the buck with that one.... Absolutely. It's very, very fast focusing, and a great range for indoor sports on a crop camera. poppie guy wrote in post #7170111 For what it's worth, here's my two cents worth. When I bought my first SLR, the only lens I had for two years was the 50mm 1.4. I don't think it would hurt a bit to stick with the 20D/nifty combo until you can afford another lens that you really want, unless you absolutely need a different focal length right now. You have picked up speed, though.
belmondo wrote in post #7171748 I'm in an Apple Store in San Diego. Your weather here sucks, John. I see I have a lot of work to do here. Catch you all later. Sic 'em, Chief! -David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Togra4 "....tragic, really. " 1,072 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Jan 23, 2009 15:26 | #312 Thanks David for the input on the 70-200 and the 85 1.8...I want them both now, but then to keep the good spread, I have been fairly convinced of the Tamron 28-75 2.8 now as well...I am pretty sure that I will go with the 70-200 f4 for now...soooo Tracy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Greg_C Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 23, 2009 15:26 | #313 I had a Vision this morning, out playing with the new camera I hear this roar, looked up to see this hot air balloon. It was a test see, I was shooting some bugs and had to quickly change settings to shoot the balloon. Greg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Togra4 "....tragic, really. " 1,072 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Jan 23, 2009 15:29 | #314 Greg, I think you passed! beautiful Tracy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poppieguy I'm Sid. Don't be hatin' my hats. 13,870 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Oregon More info | Jan 23, 2009 15:51 | #315 Togra4 wrote in post #7172177 Thanks David for the input on the 70-200 and the 85 1.8...I want them both now, but then to keep the good spread, I have been fairly convinced of the Tamron 28-75 2.8 now as well...I am pretty sure that I will go with the 70-200 f4 for now...soooo Let's say a friend just opened a bridal shop and is interested in me shooting for her clients as they try on dresses? She has let me know that she has at least 20ftx20ft of space with a chaise-like couch. So there's room for my lights...Could be groups when the bride brings in her girls...could develop into e-sessions (I am not ready for weddings just yet)....Would that change anyone's suggestions at all? The 28-75 might not be wide enough for groups in that space considering the crop factor. My son has a 30D with one of the lenses that have been mentioned here earlier, the 17-85, and he loves it. My 5D, 24-105 would work in a room that size. Your 20D plus 17-85 would give you an approximate full frame FOV of 27-136. Sounds like you could make some money with it and then buy more gear!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1763 guests, 113 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||