Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 10 Dec 2002 (Tuesday) 10:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for the best ink jet printer paper

 
thunt
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jun 2002
     
Dec 10, 2002 10:20 |  #1

Currently own a Canon D30 and Canon S900 printer and love both. However, I am having trouble find a good, dependable, inexpensive, inkjet paper to print my 8x10's on.

Looking for your input on paper weight, vendors, and inkjet paper producer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lane
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2002
     
Dec 10, 2002 11:49 |  #2

I only have the experience of Kodak paper. The the Ultima Profession glossy is the preferrable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Dec 10, 2002 12:00 |  #3

I have a Canon S9000.
I use the Kodak paper (Ultima or Premium), I get it from Thenerds.net or Provantage.com (which ever happen to be cheaper at the time). I also recommend trying Pricegrabber.com to check out various sources for supplies. I can vouch for both of the above, although there was a slight glitch from Provantage, they still made the expected timeline for delivery, so I will continue to recommend them.
I have used the Canon paper, but the Kodak paper was cheaper and Canon did not have the Satin finish I like.
I do use Canon for the larger sheets though (11x17 and 13x19).

As an amusing aside: Kodak sells bulk paper (1000 sheets) but it is cheaper per sheet to buy the 40 sheet boxes from either of the above two on-line stores. Easier on my pocket book also :-)

I have not tried ilford, epson or HP paper yet on the S9000 so have no idea how well those would work.

Just my experience


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soumya63
Member
214 posts
Joined Dec 2001
     
Dec 10, 2002 12:13 |  #4

longwatcher wrote:
I have a Canon S9000.
I use the Kodak paper (Ultima or Premium), I get it from Thenerds.net or Provantage.com (which ever happen to be cheaper at the time).

Just to warn you, Kodak is not compatible with Canon ink. If you pick up your prints, you will definitely notice ink pooling which will be very apparent in the sold colored places like sky. It appears like grains in high-speed films. To see the difference, print the same print in Canon or Epson Paper.

I also bought those papers cheap from Costco and then gave them to my daughters to play and use in their school projects.

The only third party paper, which is as good as Canon is Epson. It is cheaper and works fine with Canon ink. There may be other brands but I am not experimenting any more. Now a day I use Canon or Epson paper with third party ink and do my ICC profile with Profile Prism. It works great for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cal ­ Maier
Member
131 posts
Joined Feb 2002
     
Dec 10, 2002 20:25 |  #5

Both the Canon and the Epson work well with the Canon printers but I will mention that Ilford is making a high quality ink jet paper in the new Gallerie series that is even more cost effective than the Epson and is proving to be a popular alternative for high quality prints in our trading area. They have two types of paper that are compatible with the Canon and the Epson photo printers, they are Smooth Gloss and Smooth Pearl, both types are made for the archival inks used by these printers.

If you can get these papers in your area I would suggest that you try them. The Smooth Pearl is very nice paper for High quality portrait work, and is available in sizes up to 13" X 19".

Cal




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sheila
Member
215 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Avalon Beach, Sydney, Australia
     
Dec 10, 2002 21:56 |  #6

I agree that Kodak paper is not good with Canon printers. I have an 820 and was bitterly disappointed when printing out my first images. They were terrible until it was pointed out at Fred Miranda's site that Canon printers don't like Kodak paper (brand loyalty I guess!).

I now use Ilford Galerie series - Classic Pearl and Smooth Pearl is a semi matte and excellent so far. My only gripe with the Ilford paper is that it takes longer to dry than the Canon and Epsom glossy paper possibly due to it being matte. Ilford comes in packages of 100 which makes it far cheaper than buying in the usual 20 or 25 lots. In Australia, Canon do not sell any matte paper nor does the Canon glossy come in packages of 100.


Cheers
Sheila


Sheila Smart
Sydney, Australia
Canon 5D Mark III and various L primes and zooms
http://www.sheilasmart​photography.com.au (external link)
http://sheilasmartphot​ography.blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lhrusovsky
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
12 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: North Coast Ohio
     
Dec 11, 2002 07:07 |  #7

I have a Canon Canon S800 printer and use extensively with good results Red River Ultra Pro Satin.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Dec 11, 2002 10:35 |  #8

soumya63 wrote:


Just to warn you, Kodak is not compatible with Canon ink. If you pick up your prints, you will definitely notice ink pooling which will be very apparent in the sold colored places like sky. It appears like grains in high-speed films. To see the difference, print the same print in Canon or Epson Paper.

Interesting,
I had noticed this effect (on a person's face) when I first got my printer (although I can't remember which paper I was using Canon or Kodak), but it only occurred on one image and only on glossy paper, it did not show up on satin finish at the time or since then on any of the paper I have used (at least so I noticed). I will look closely again tonight, but am curious if this was caused more by the newness of the printer versus the actual paper.

Question: which paper were you using, Premium or Ultima, Gloss or Satin finish? I have been using Ultima Gloss and Satin.


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
traveler
Member
33 posts
Joined Dec 2002
     
Dec 11, 2002 19:46 |  #9

I compared the Epson 1280 with the S9000 at home before I send the Epson packing. Not because it wasn't an excellent printer, but because I preferred the more "film output look" of the S9000. Right up to the 13x19's it is sweet and accurate in color tone and clarity. I use ONLY PhotoPaperPro from Canon. The drivers are indeed optimized for this paper. If you use another you are basically "on your own" or to use your creative capabilities to create a custom profile that will work with other paper. I'm not so daring nor do I have the time to dink around. Otherwise the speed alone in intoxicating. Go for it........




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johniem
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Dec 2002
     
Dec 12, 2002 02:14 |  #10

I have tried various papers in my Canon S820, and the best although not the cheapest was Canon Pro101, it's about £8.50 for 20 A4 sheets from 7dayshop.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveCliff
Member
142 posts
Joined Jun 2002
     
Dec 12, 2002 08:22 |  #11

Sheila wrote:
I now use Ilford Galerie series - Classic Pearl and Smooth Pearl is a semi matte and excellent so far. My only gripe with the Ilford paper is that it takes longer to dry than the Canon and Epsom glossy paper possibly due to it being matte.

I've seen this comment a number of times - Any chance you can tell me how long are we talking about, say, for a full A4 colour print ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soumya63
Member
214 posts
Joined Dec 2001
     
Dec 12, 2002 11:06 |  #12

longwatcher wrote:

To Soumya63

Question: which paper were you using, Premium or Ultima, Gloss or Satin finish? I have been using Ultima Gloss and Satin.

I have used The Premium paper. According to my opinion, ink pooling can happen due to two reasons

1) Ink does not get absorbed quick enough by the paper due to some chemical reason

2) Printer sprays too much ink due to wrong selection of the paper type.

I have followed Kodak's instruction by setting Paper profile as normal paper (not a photo paper) for Canon printer. That does not work. So I tried all other setting, but results were same. I have tried with Canon as well as third party ink and both the cases the result was bad. Some pictures, it is not as apparent but picture containing smooth flat tones becomes absolutely grainy. Another reader from this forum also confirmed this observation.

Canon's own paper is so far the best and quest for other compatible paper for me was purely economic reason. I have found my solution in Epson paper which Costco sales 100 sheet 25$ or so. I have not found any other cheaper solution than that. Any advice on further reducing paper cost without loosing quality is always welcome :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gary ­ Gibson
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Dec 2002
     
Dec 13, 2002 14:15 |  #13

Hello all,
Contrary to popular belief, you do not have to buy the outrageously expensive paper by the Top Gun photo folks.

Just by chance I tried the Glossy Heavyweight paper from ...............OFFICE DEPOT !
Specs:
8.5" x 11"
69lb., 10.25mils
260g/m
High Gloss
Cost:
$39.95/100 ( maybe less @ Holiday/Sale time)

On a HP Printer this stuff is A+, used on other brand(s) printers no problem what so ever. It produces absolutely beautiful glossy photos, with no pooling, puddeling, etc.

What the hell, at this price it's worth a shot !
Gary




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fishsnagger
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Nov 2002
     
Dec 13, 2002 18:16 |  #14

I am glad Gary mentioned Office Depot paper. I have used their high-gloss (260g/m^2) for over a year (but on Epson) and actually prefer it. The also offer a “archival paper (300g/m^2) – haven’t tried it -- and a satin gloss (260g/m^2) at the same price as the one Gary mentioned.

Fishsnagger




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Derfel
Member
30 posts
Joined Oct 2002
     
Dec 13, 2002 18:25 |  #15

Amazing.

I was reading the first few posts, saying "Wow... Kodak?" or "Wow... Epson?" They seem so expensive, and I get what I assumed were decent results on... OFFICE DEPOT PAPER!

And here we have it. I'm not insane, or blind. I get acceptable results on their premimum glossy paper, and it's a few dollars cheaper than the rest. Yay Office Depot!

(A friend told me that Office Depot photo paper is actually made by Fuji, of all people... but I don't believe him.)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,136 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Looking for the best ink jet printer paper
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1741 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.