Wonder if that will be possible?
Or will it just be a waste of bytes and time?
ArcticShooter Goldmember 1,828 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø) More info | Jan 25, 2009 10:16 | #1 |
Adrena1in Goldmember 1,703 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK. More info | Jan 26, 2009 09:05 | #2 Be interested to know what HDR means! Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssracer Goldmember 1,855 posts Likes: 10 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Louisville, KY More info | Jan 26, 2009 09:13 | #3 High Dynamic Range
LOG IN TO REPLY |
renderwerks Senior Member 276 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Alta Loma, Ca More info | Jan 29, 2009 19:38 | #4 Haven't tried it with just the moon. It would be interesting to shoot an exposure correct for the moon and one correct for the stars... I would think that the aura or glow from the moon would wash out quite a bit on the longer exposure for the stars. Rick-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
luigis Goldmember 1,399 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina More info | Jan 29, 2009 20:38 | #5 What renderwerks says is very interesting, the Dynamic range from a full moon to the stars might probably break a world record. I think you'd do better with just an exposure for the stars, one for the moon and a composite. www.luisargerich.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1630 guests, 143 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||