Pekka,
I was perusing the archives here and at dpreview, and noticed that Sigma 14/2.8 #1 was fuzzy to the right, and Sigma 14/2.8 #2 is fuzzy to the left. I haven't seen where you've exchanged #2 for Unit #3 yet. Care to give us an update?
In a related note, I responded in another thread that the Sigma 20/1.8 might be a viable option to the Canon 17-35L as it's faster, less expensive, and probably sharper wide open (prime v zoom). Does anyone have experience or samples taken with this lens? I'm talking specifically about the Sigma 20/1.8 DG EX, which was released within the past six months or so.
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/Html/news/Pixfs_20_f1-8.htm![]()
I was originally inclined to go for the Canon 17-35L, but I'm thinking that I might be better off getting a couple of primes as it will probably be more cost effective. Plus, the 20/1.8 is about 1.5 stops faster than the Canon anyway. This one should be an excellent ambient light lens.
I would consider the new Sigma 15-30 zoom if it wasn't so slow.
Finally, it would be great if Canon's mid-range zooms would cover down to 24mm. We're already seeing this trend in third party lenses, with the Sigma 24-70 and Tamron 24-135 introduced in the past year. I've heard rumors that a 24-135L or 24-105L lens may be among the new lenses Canon will introduce. It would be nice if Canon upgraded their well-esteemed 28-135IS to a 24-135IS!
JCDoss


