Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 28 Jan 2009 (Wednesday) 18:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rechargable battery question

 
BluewookieJim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,095 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Southern CT
     
Jan 28, 2009 18:46 |  #1

Hi all. Some of you are very knowledgeable about rechargeable batteries, so even though I hate starting a new topic for this, I have to ask.

I have a Lacrosse BC900U charger, and several sets of eneloops.

One set of AAA eneloops has been giving my a problem. I put them in my Harmony Remote, fully charged, and within a day the remote is dying. I have another set, and the remote normally runs 4 to 5 weeks with that set. I have the multiple sets clearly marked, so I don't mix them up.

Anyway, after having this happen a few times, I decided to do a refresh on that set with the Lacrosse. It ran several days, and here are the final results.


16 | 16 | 16 | 17 mA
1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.49 V
739 | 804 | 822 | 840 mAh
Should I replace one or more of the batteries in this set?

My Gear and Stuff :: My Zenfolio Gallery (external link) :: My Flickr (external link) :: http://photos.kodanja.​net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pilot ­ Dane
Member
165 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Roxboro, NC
     
Jan 29, 2009 08:46 |  #2

What are the numbers you provided? They look like the numbers you would see while the batteries are being charged, which does not tell you much about the battery except that 739-840 is a lot to put into those batteries. How do the numbers compare with your good set of batteries?

Is the ma the the ammount trickling into the cells when you looked at the display?
Is the voltage the voltage of the cells being charged?
Is the mah the amount of charge put into the battery during that charge cycle?


50D, 24-105L, 100-400L, EF-S 17-55, 430EX, Gitzo GM5561T monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4522
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 29, 2009 09:16 |  #3

I speculate one low capacity cell in the 'bad set'. Run that set on the remote until the remote is dying, then pull the set and check voltage on each cell in the set...a bad cell will become apparent.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BluewookieJim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,095 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Southern CT
     
Jan 29, 2009 11:08 |  #4

Thanks.

The numbers I listed are the readings from the Lacrosse BC900U after the full refresh cycle completed.

I'll have to read the manual (ugh) to see if I can just use it to get a reading on the batteries after some use. I don't recall if there is a mode that doesn't automatically start charging or discharging the batteries.


My Gear and Stuff :: My Zenfolio Gallery (external link) :: My Flickr (external link) :: http://photos.kodanja.​net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pilot ­ Dane
Member
165 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Roxboro, NC
     
Jan 29, 2009 16:30 as a reply to  @ BluewookieJim's post |  #5

As Wilt said. Check the batteries when they are dead or under a load. It is hard to tell much from a charged battery. Just like a bad car battery shows good voltage until you put a load on it and the voltage plumets (leaving you to walk home in the rain).

I assume you will see different numbers on your charger depending on when you look. My chargers (I use mostly LiPoly's) will beep when "charged" but actually the beep or fully charged indication comes when the batteries are at about 95%. So if I look soon after is says charged it sill indicates a current flow into the batteries (charging) then over the next half hour the current flowing into the batteries will drop to near zero. My chargers record the amount of charge put into the battery so a bad cell will take only 250mAh to go from discharged to charged while a good one will take 750mAh. Judging by the price of the Lacrosse BC900U I am not sure if it actually records the amount of current put into batteries. It may put a number on the display but I'm not sure it has an accurate way of determining the number.


50D, 24-105L, 100-400L, EF-S 17-55, 430EX, Gitzo GM5561T monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BluewookieJim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,095 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Southern CT
     
Jan 30, 2009 09:03 |  #6

In the refresh mode that I used earlier, it repeatedly discharges and recharges the batteries (individually) until
no further increase in the measured capacities is estimated.

The final readings I listed before were as follows:

(V) Instantaneous Battery Voltage
(mA) Trickle charging curret
(mAh) Maximum battery capacity determined in discharging
(T) Elapsed time of last discharging -- I didn't record this reading


The charger also has a test mode, which will fully charge each battery, then discharge to determine capacity, and then fully charge again.

Will this be useful in helping me determine which battery is faulty?


My Gear and Stuff :: My Zenfolio Gallery (external link) :: My Flickr (external link) :: http://photos.kodanja.​net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4522
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 30, 2009 09:28 |  #7

It would appear that battery 1 has 9-12% less capacity compared to other batteries. But that itself is not a clear cut indicatory of 'guilty' sentence. You mentioned four factors but only listed three...the T value would seem to be the indicator you need.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BluewookieJim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,095 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Southern CT
     
Jan 30, 2009 10:05 |  #8

Wilt wrote in post #7219799 (external link)
You mentioned four factors but only listed three...the T value would seem to be the indicator you need.


I know. When I first looked over the details of what the final readings meant, I mis-read the (T) result as time elapsed charging, rather than time elapsed discharging.

The one thing that should be immediately helpful is that the voltage reading is instantaneous, so a significant difference after some use should be immediately evident.


My Gear and Stuff :: My Zenfolio Gallery (external link) :: My Flickr (external link) :: http://photos.kodanja.​net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pilot ­ Dane
Member
165 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Roxboro, NC
     
Feb 01, 2009 19:10 |  #9

You have one set that works well in the remote and one set that does not. How do the numbers from your charger differ? If there is such an obvious difference in their performance the chargers numbers should clearly show it.


50D, 24-105L, 100-400L, EF-S 17-55, 430EX, Gitzo GM5561T monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BluewookieJim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,095 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Southern CT
     
Feb 01, 2009 22:52 |  #10

Luckily I have 2 extra AAA eneloops.

Anyway, after running that set in the remote for almost 2 days, it was starting to die again. I put the set back in the Lacrosse BC900 to check the voltages, and the #1 battery was showing 'null' which indicates a damaged battery. The other 3 batteries were all showing voltages around 1.35.

So, the #1 battery is out, being replaced with one of the spares.


My Gear and Stuff :: My Zenfolio Gallery (external link) :: My Flickr (external link) :: http://photos.kodanja.​net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,505 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Rechargable battery question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1446 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.