Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 30 Jan 2009 (Friday) 19:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

"1440 by 900" or "1920 x 1200" ?

 
Obtong
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Washington State
     
Jan 30, 2009 19:44 |  #1

Hi,

I'm looking at getting a Dell Precision M4400 laptop. My current laptop has a 15 inch screen with 1440 by 900 resolution, whereas the M4400 has a resolution of 1920 x 1200 and also has a 15 inch screen. Everything looks so much smaller on the 1920 x 1200 15" screen. It looks like I have more desktop real estate, but what other advantages would a 1920 x 1200 resolution on a 15" screen have?

~Dom


Digital: 6D, 5D, 50mm f/1.8 Mk 1, 85mm f/1.8, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4, 550EX, 580EX ii (2), 430EZ (2)
Film: AE-1, A-1, M6, Kowa Super 66

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,667 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3294
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Jan 30, 2009 20:33 |  #2

don't need any? 1920x1200 on my 15" D820 is amazing!


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Obtong
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Washington State
     
Jan 30, 2009 20:55 |  #3

Greetings fellow Brit! The M4400 I played about was bright and crisp. However, I found that the text on most web sites was too small I have good eyesight but I found myself squinting a lot and it was a hassle zooming through web pages. Also, I found that it was hard to scroll through windows or navigate the menu bar because they were so small. Did you get used this, or is is just worth it for the clarity of the screen?

~Dom


Digital: 6D, 5D, 50mm f/1.8 Mk 1, 85mm f/1.8, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4, 550EX, 580EX ii (2), 430EZ (2)
Film: AE-1, A-1, M6, Kowa Super 66

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,667 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3294
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Jan 31, 2009 11:21 |  #4

tbh, i have never had trouble viewing stuff on screen, i used to run 1600x1200 on my old Iiyama VIsion Master 17in back in 1996 and everyone asked me how i could read the stuff on screen!

i view my screens from arms reach (31in)


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jan 31, 2009 11:28 |  #5

Depends what you do with it. Photoshop on a laptop with a hi-res screen is brilliant. Viewing web pages is a bit of a pain. If you use your laptop to show anyone else web pages (like clients) they will squint, especially if over 40. I prefer my new Macbook Pro to my old Vista laptop even though I miss the resolution for graphics work, showing pages to people on the old machine always required "now it will look bigger on a normal screen" :rolleyes:


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12mnkys
Senior Member
Avatar
709 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Somewhere between the Land of Calm and Insanity...
     
Jan 31, 2009 11:51 |  #6

If you have a 15" screen with those pixel dimensions then you have a very hi-res screen.

For example:

If the long edge of your screen is 1920 pixels and the short end is 1200 pixels, then the diagonal from top corner to bottom corner would be equal to around 2264 pixels. If the diagonal dimension is 15" then your screen would have a resolution of around 151 pixels per inch or 151 dpi....which is definitely on the high end...


Panasonic Lumix GX-1 | Panasonic 12-35 f/2.8 O.I.S. | Panasonic 40 f/1.7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
Jan 31, 2009 12:04 |  #7

I think that res is too high for a 15" screen. Great for space on your desktop but you need to be comfortable reading and editing on it!


All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Obtong
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Washington State
     
Jan 31, 2009 12:37 |  #8

Hmm... I do a lot of web work with my job, and often work together with colleagues with my laptop. The 1920 x 1200 resolution on a 15" screen, although looks incredibly sharp and gives lots of desktop space, will present me with too many problems with small text. For me, it seems that the best screen resolution for my new laptop would be 1440 by 900.

~Dom


Digital: 6D, 5D, 50mm f/1.8 Mk 1, 85mm f/1.8, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4, 550EX, 580EX ii (2), 430EZ (2)
Film: AE-1, A-1, M6, Kowa Super 66

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
Jan 31, 2009 12:39 |  #9

Obtong wrote in post #7227025 (external link)
Hmm... I do a lot of web work with my job, and often work together with colleagues with my laptop. The 1920 x 1200 resolution on a 15" screen, although looks incredibly sharp and gives lots of desktop space, will present me with too many problems with small text. For me, it seems that the best screen resolution for my new laptop would be 1440 by 900.

~Dom

Generally laptop screens have a maximum setting - I've not seen any small screens that allow settings as high at 1920 x 1200!

My Sony has a 16.4" screen allowing 1600 x 900. This is just about right.


All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vroom_skies
Senior Member
Avatar
382 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jan 31, 2009 19:40 |  #10

I would go for the 1440 x 900.
I'm running 1920 x 1200 on my 24" screen which is great, but on a 15" screen, your eyes would be killing you. Or at least me.
Plus wouldn't the 1440 x 900 screen be LED? Pretty sure that's what Dell is offering now a days.


My Website (external link)
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Obtong
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Washington State
     
Jan 31, 2009 19:56 |  #11

Hi,

The Dell M4400 does indeed come with a 15.4" WUXGA TrueLife RGB LED display (1920x1200) featuring 100% Adobe® Color Gamut screen (external link)! Follow the link and check it out.

I've seen it and played about with it. I have pretty good eyesight, but after half an hour of use I could feel the eye strain.

The 1440 x 900 is a LED screen, so I'm hoping that it will be very usable for basic to advanced photo editing.

~Dom


Digital: 6D, 5D, 50mm f/1.8 Mk 1, 85mm f/1.8, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4, 550EX, 580EX ii (2), 430EZ (2)
Film: AE-1, A-1, M6, Kowa Super 66

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 01, 2009 05:12 |  #12

Bobster wrote in post #7226633 (external link)
I view my screens from arms reach (31in)

Did you measure the length of your arms for this thread, or do you just happen to know how long your arms are?! :p


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,667 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3294
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Feb 01, 2009 12:15 |  #13

i had my arms measured for a suit and still remember those measurements :) (approx btw)


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
Feb 01, 2009 12:39 |  #14

Obtong wrote in post #7229027 (external link)
Hi,

The Dell M4400 does indeed come with a 15.4" WUXGA TrueLife RGB LED display (1920x1200) featuring 100% Adobe® Color Gamut screen (external link)! Follow the link and check it out.

I've seen it and played about with it. I have pretty good eyesight, but after half an hour of use I could feel the eye strain.

The 1440 x 900 is a LED screen, so I'm hoping that it will be very usable for basic to advanced photo editing.

~Dom

The 1920 x 1200 resolution might be great for watching a high def movie but not for much else on a 15.4" screen I wouldn't imagine? Text would be just too small


All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Feb 01, 2009 12:54 as a reply to  @ EOS_JD's post |  #15

Off topic but but I think it applies to viewing text size on websites.

On PC you can instantly increase/decrease the size of the fonts of a website buy holding down the control key and using the scroll wheel on your mouse. There may be other key combos that activate this shortcut but that is the combo I use.

Hold down the "CTL" and use the wheel of your mouse to increase or decrease the font size

You can thank me now :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,308 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
"1440 by 900" or "1920 x 1200" ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
967 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.