How can i deal with the magnification caused by glasses:
 | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
I like this pic till i noticed the eye.
HELP!
Jan 31, 2009 15:25 | #1 How can i deal with the magnification caused by glasses:
I like this pic till i noticed the eye. HELP! Jon. S. LRPS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JFusion Senior Member  851 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Dayton, Ohio More info | Jan 31, 2009 15:40 | #2 Photoshop or pop out the lenses before taking the shot. Jeremi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
superstes Goldmember  1,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern France More info | Jan 31, 2009 15:52 | #3 Why would you want to, shot looks great.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2009 15:54 | #4 superstes wrote in post #7227898  Why would you want to, shot looks great. Don't you think the lower eye looks bad? Jon. S. LRPS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
superstes Goldmember 1,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern France More info | Jan 31, 2009 16:06 | #5 I had a good look.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Super-Nicko Goldmember  1,652 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Perth, Western Australia More info | Jan 31, 2009 17:20 | #6 just a lazy mans edit... with a reduction in image size by 15% then clone the reduced images eyes into the original... i agree that the original works but this is an option if your doing a close portrait and not hundreds of images... hope you dont mind  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. My gallery - just posted some of my top shots
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nates98cbr Senior Member  884 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Indiana More info | Jan 31, 2009 20:30 | #7 I think the original looks fine. Popping the lenses out is a good idea, just make sure you don't mess the glasses up in the process.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2009 21:08 | #8 The original looks fine to me, too. I see nothing at all wrong with it. It is a wonderful image of a young girl who happens to wear glasses. Andrew
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2009 02:58 | #9 Thanks for all the comments guys. Jon. S. LRPS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
superstes Goldmember 1,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern France More info | Feb 01, 2009 03:30 | #10 Super-Nicko wrote in post #7228334 just a lazy mans edit... with a reduction in image size by 15% then clone the reduced images eyes into the original That's a good tip, I'll remember that, thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JBerlotti Senior Member  751 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Lompoc, CA More info | Feb 01, 2009 04:09 | #11 I would think if you tilt up her glasses a hair off the ears while shooting the lens wont be do direct into the camera. That is the technique I use when shooting people in the studio with glasses to keep the glare from the softboxes from showing in the pic. I have never thought of using it for mag. But I have never had that problem. Maybe the tilt prevented it? Anyhow, just changing the angle of the lens ever so slightly might do the trick. ~ Joseph ~ Gear List/Feedback ~ My Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CeeJayCee Member  147 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scotland, UK More info | Feb 01, 2009 06:41 | #12 You could try moving the glasses further up her nose - that way the magnification would be a bit less. Also, tilt the head so you don't see the distortion on the side of her face.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1272 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
