SFzip Member 110 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Feb 04, 2009 00:39 | #1 NEW LUMIQUEST QUIK BOUNCE: IDEAL FOR WEDDING AND EVENT PHOTOGRAPHERS New Braunfels, Texas – January 8, 2009 The new LumiQuest Quik Bounce is designed for use with or without a ceiling to soften the light and transitioning from the horizontal to vertical format effortlessly. The unique design has doors that can open to allow for 80% ceiling bounce while allowing 20% of the light to bounce off the remaining surface area to provide fill light and more even illumination. When there is no ceiling available to bounce the light (or the ceiling is too high or colored) the doors would remain closed and 100% of the light would bounce off this surface area. The unique design allows the photographer to shoot vertically without having to adjust the Quik Bounce on the flash. While the Quik Bounce is perfect for any fast moving photographer it is ideal for wedding photographers. “From speaking with wedding photographers and watching them work I recognized the need to design a product that would allow them to take advantage of ceiling bounce when available, while at the same time transition seamlessly from horizontal to vertical shots,” stated Quest Couch, CEO and the designer of LumiQuest products. The Quik Bounce attaches to the flash using self-adhesive Velcro or with the optional Cinch Strap. It is available at all authorized LumiQuest dealers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Feb 04, 2009 04:54 | #2 I like the fact that it's oriented on the side of the flash head. This makes it viable for use in vertical orientation with simple flash-flip type brackets, or not bracket at all. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neilwood32 Cream of the Crop 6,231 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland More info | Feb 04, 2009 05:06 | #3 Looks like a great idea - would love to see a review before i went and bought one though. Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2009 05:12 | #4 ABBC is a cheaper alternative R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Feb 04, 2009 05:20 | #5 strobe monkey wrote in post #7251111 ABBC is a cheaper alternative Look carefully at the design. With the doors closed, this device catches all of the light from your flash. This is similar to their Pocket Bouncer (or their Promax System w/ insert). In a room with a very high ceiling, this makes more efficient use of the light, creating a larger effective light source and moving it further away from the lens. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peacefield Goldmember 4,023 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2008 Location: NJ More info | Feb 04, 2009 07:16 | #6 I don't know why anyone would spend the money. Doors open, you might as well have a large bounce card. Doors closed, spend $3 on fun foam and make your own. Robert Wayne Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2009 08:48 | #7 Curtis N wrote in post #7251134 Look carefully at the design. With the doors closed, this device catches all of the light from your flash. This is similar to their Pocket Bouncer (or their Promax System w/ insert). In a room with a very high ceiling, this makes more efficient use of the light, creating a larger effective light source and moving it further away from the lens. The Better Bounce Card can be used this way too, but it's not designed to catch all of the light and thus is less efficient (longer recycle times, shorter battery life). Yes I can see the door, and I also know lumunquest's other products but the ABBC can also catch all the light if you push/fold it forward, depending on how big your DIY ABBC is. I made a bigger one anyway (height wise). R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Feb 04, 2009 09:00 | #8 I think the idea is ease and speed switching back and forth. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 04, 2009 09:57 | #9 When a local camera shop was having a closing sale (sad sad trend these days), I noticed the LumiQuest Promax system package. It was my first time closely inspecting it in my hands, and my immediate thought was, "boy, am I glad that I didn't spend any money ordering this thing!" I still like this cheap $5 fun foamy thingy a lot better (and without the bracket, too). Still, if anyone's looking for a product that is commercially available, my first recommendation would be LumiQuest above all else.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 04, 2009 12:12 | #10 SYS wrote in post #7252196 When a local camera shop was having a closing sale (sad sad trend these days), I noticed the LumiQuest Promax system package. It was my first time closely inspecting it in my hands, and my immediate thought was, "boy, am I glad that I didn't spend any money ordering this thing!" I still like this cheap $5 fun foamy thingy a lot better (and without the bracket, too). Still, if anyone's looking for a product that is commercially available, my first recommendation would be LumiQuest above all else. ![]() ![]() How does one simulate an 80/20 bounce with this unit? Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Feb 04, 2009 12:33 | #11 The only advantage I see in the quick bounce over the ProMax is the ability to adapt to vertical shooting easily due to how it sits on the flash head. I'm a big fan of the ProMax due to its versatility. Last year I was shooting a wine auction and the ability to put in the card, turn it into a softbox, etc. saved me a few times through the evening. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2009 12:39 | #12 Curtis N wrote in post #7251867 Nothing wrong with the low-cost alternatives. But for those who shoot events for a living, these devices can be worth the expense. Agree and it also looks professional. To photographers, it doesn't matter what the gear looks like, but to people who don't know much, it will make a good impression. R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2009 12:40 | #13 SYS wrote in post #7252196 When a local camera shop was having a closing sale (sad sad trend these days), I noticed the LumiQuest Promax system package. It was my first time closely inspecting it in my hands, and my immediate thought was, "boy, am I glad that I didn't spend any money ordering this thing!" I still like this cheap $5 fun foamy thingy a lot better (and without the bracket, too). Still, if anyone's looking for a product that is commercially available, my first recommendation would be LumiQuest above all else. ![]() ![]() We must have seen the same website..I made 2 of these...1 square and 1 rounded EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 04, 2009 12:41 | #14 Titus213 wrote in post #7253103 How does one simulate an 80/20 bounce with this unit? The foamy bouncer's "ceiling" is designed to open up vertically to allow bouncing off walls. Admittedly, it's not exactly "80/20" but I seriously doubt that the difference is anywhere significant. If someone can do a substantial testing between the two diffusers and prove that the LumiQuest's 80/20 indeed produces superior results, then I can easily replicate the foamy design by cutting up some holes to its "ceiling."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shooting Goldmember 1,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Feb 04, 2009 22:31 | #15 strobe monkey wrote in post #7251111 ABBC is a cheaper alternative But the abbc cannot effectively shoot a group of 13 people..I tried that and the 3 people on each end were dark..the way the abbc wrapped around the flash head kept the light from spreading out...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1046 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||