Hi all,
I just did my taxes and I'm getting close to 6K back!!
Help me spend my $$!!
What would POTN do?!

Feb 05, 2009 11:04 | #1 Hi all, Web: Erotiklab
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neilwood32 Cream of the Crop 6,231 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland More info | Feb 05, 2009 11:15 | #2 I think most people would suggest donations to the less fortunate people (me!:lol Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2009 11:27 | #3 Adjust your withholding next year so you're not giving the government a $6k interest free loan? -Liz
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2009 11:37 | #4 gymell wrote in post #7260260 Adjust your withholding next year so you're not giving the government a $6k interest free loan? ![]() Absolutely right, but not what I wanted to hear! Web: Erotiklab
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HSK Goldmember 1,124 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: London, UK More info | Feb 05, 2009 11:38 | #5 Booze & Women - always booze and women.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2009 11:39 | #6 HSK wrote in post #7260352 Booze & Women - always booze and women.
Web: Erotiklab
LOG IN TO REPLY |
inthedeck Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 05, 2009 11:44 | #7 200 f2 LIS. Done. MCSquared Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Palladium Goldmember 3,905 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA More info | IMHO - I would put half into your mortgage as an extra principal payment. This will probably cut years off your total payments.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2009 11:54 | #9 inthedeck wrote in post #7260388 200 f2 LIS. Done. ![]() But, on the more realistic side, new glass/body, but, doesn't seem that you need it. Manish! Web: Erotiklab
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2009 11:55 | #10 Palladium wrote in post #7260467 IMHO - I would put half into your mortgage as an extra principal payment. This will probably cut years off your total payments. For your glamor stuff with the other half I'd get some glass that will hold it's value eg. 85L, 24-70L Great idea. I would never spend the entire amount! I going to use some to upgrade my bathroom. Web: Erotiklab
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle" 10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | Feb 05, 2009 12:27 | #11 I think it depends a lot on what you like to shoot. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2009 12:38 | #12 Tee Why wrote in post #7260724 I think it depends a lot on what you like to shoot. The XT is getting a bit long in the tooth. Maybe you can sell it and upgrade. I'd consider a 40D or a 50D if you like the crop factor but maybe a used 5D or a new 5DMII if you are thinking full frame. If it was me (I prefer fine art/landscape/cityscape), I'd consider a nice 5DMII, 17-40L, a Grip for the camera, keep the tamron 28-75mm, 430EX II flash, and maybe a telephoto lens like a 135mm L or a 70-200mm lens. That should go to $5000 or $6000 I think. If you don't mind changing formats, I'd go with a Nikon D700 with a 12-24mm, 24-70mm, and a 135mm, and one of their flash. That would be about $6000 if not a touch more. If you like to stick with the crop factor (and want more versatility and reach for zoos and sports), I'd consider a 40D or a 50D with a Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 for the wide stuff, a Canon 17-55mm f2.8 or a Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, maybe a Sigma 30mm f1.4, a 70-200mm zoom or a 100-400 depending on your need for reach, and a 430EX II flash. A 40D/toke 11-16, 17-55IS, grip, 430EX, 100-400mm should go for about $4500 or so. I'd keep the change for a new laptop. ![]() Wow, that was fun spending your money. You seem to really enjoy spending other people's money! Web: Erotiklab
LOG IN TO REPLY |
inthedeck Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 05, 2009 14:15 | #13 Alex, since you already have the 28-75 mm covered, in a fast lens, I'd consider the 100mm f/2.0 or 2.8 macro, the 85 1.8, or the 135mm L or f/2. You do lots of glamour/nude type work, so that 135 might be a bit long...especially on a 1.6x cam. the 100, imo, would be where it's at for decent beauty work, and 85 would be fine for 3/4 shots. Of course, if you didn't need money for the bathroom project, I still say the 200 f/2 LIS. MCSquared Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timrocks311 Senior Member 289 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2008 Location: PA More info | Feb 05, 2009 14:17 | #14 man, if i got $6k back the wife wouldn't let me spend it. honestly, if it were me, i'd put half toward the mortgage or home improvements. then if i were to blow the remaining $3k on camera equipment (probably not, but...) i'd go for a used 40D, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8 IS 70D | 18-35 Art | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 100L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2009 16:14 | #15 inthedeck wrote in post #7261417 Alex, since you already have the 28-75 mm covered, in a fast lens, I'd consider the 100mm f/2.0 or 2.8 macro, the 85 1.8, or the 135mm L or f/2. You do lots of glamour/nude type work, so that 135 might be a bit long...especially on a 1.6x cam. the 100, imo, would be where it's at for decent beauty work, and 85 would be fine for 3/4 shots. Of course, if you didn't need money for the bathroom project, I still say the 200 f/2 LIS. If it were 'my' money, I'd get new lights (a pair of Elinc. RX600's & 400's w/ some diffusers), a 135L and call it a day. ![]() Manish, Web: Erotiklab
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1228 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||