Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 09 Feb 2009 (Monday) 13:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Photoshopping the deceased

 
JasonRussell
Senior Member
939 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Norfolk Va.
     
Feb 09, 2009 13:27 |  #1

Alright guys bare with me for a little back story here.

A few months back my ex girlfriend, from 10 years ago, little sister was killed on a ATV.

Well about a week ago I get a call from the mother asking me about doing a familly session so they can have some up to date pictures with the extended family when they come into town this weekend.

I got a call today asking about a few small details. Then she dropped a bomb on me. "How good are you with photoshop Jason?" I already senced what was coming next.

You guessed it.

She wants me to photoshop Megan, the deceased daughter, into one of the pictures because they donot have any recent family pictures with all the kids.

I tried backing my way out of this idea but she wasnt going for that option. I explained that because this photo was going to be taken with everyone wearing the same thing and any photo she has of Megan will obviously not have her wearing the same thing, nomatter how go a person was at PS, it would not look natural. The poses for this picture will not be able to replicate what Megan was doing in any pictures she has of her, etc, etc...

Now I am not only looking at this from the technical aspect but also from a moral point of view. I loved this girl like she was my own daughter and would have done anything for her. Going to the families house for the vigil tore me up inside. Looking at a picture of her would prob be very difficult for me also.

One more thought came into my head later after I hung up the phone. How, as a mother, could you think that altering a family portrait and adding in your deceased daughter, is a good idea?

Am I making a big deal out of this or what?


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Feb 09, 2009 13:46 |  #2

I'm not surprised this has '0' replies so far.

Wow, what an odd request to deal with. You can see where she is coming from but to me this is creepy. Your warnings were right on that no matter how much you try, there is a good chance it will not look seamless. You'll be relegated to taking the best photo of the girl and trying to simulate that lighting with the family.

Weird.. and like you, I wouldn't want to do it if it is someone I was close to.

I am, however, chicken to say that to someone who just lost their daughter, so I would simply excuse myself as "not good enough with Photoshop" to attempt it.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Feb 09, 2009 13:51 |  #3

Agree with above, i don't think anyone could make it s good as they want/expect. Is a hard thing to broach with the family though


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JasonRussell
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
939 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Norfolk Va.
     
Feb 09, 2009 14:09 |  #4

Thanks guys ;) Only thing I could vome up with (I havent mentioned this to the family yet) is to maybe, just maybe, be able to use one of her pictures in a layer and lower the opacity and maybe add her face into the sky.

Either way Im not really feeling this shoot :(


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Feb 09, 2009 14:09 |  #5

Ok, weird request and I'm going to skip on the moral part for clearly morals are based on an individuals own personal beliefs and who am I to stand as judge and proclaim what you want done is either ok or not. So, I have an idea from the technical side. if you have someone stand in for the deceased, about the same size and shape, dressed the same as the others, and posed with the rest of the group, then later all you have to do is photoshop in the head. Make sure that the stand in has their head in about the same position as the photo you are going to be using. This will make it look very natural and look as if the deceased was there and fits in and not as if she is there as an afterthought.

BTW, I used this technique to get a family portrait together as one member was not available at the time of the shoot and stopped by the day before. It worked out very nicely and unless you had seen the original pic you could not tell the difference.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Feb 09, 2009 14:12 |  #6

I think what seems odd to us about this is that a photograph is a document of an event or a time in people's lives. What she's asking for is for you to create a memory and a time that never really happened -- the last time her kids were together -- and this seems like fakery to us. You might suggest to her that this sort of memorial might be more appropriate painted as an oil on canvas from photographs rather than an actual photo.

JasonRussell wrote in post #7288986 (external link)
Thanks guys ;) Only thing I could vome up with (I havent mentioned this to the family yet) is to maybe, just maybe, be able to use one of her pictures in a layer and lower the opacity and maybe add her face into the sky.

Either way Im not really feeling this shoot :(

Yea this is a good way to go, too. I was going to suggest some sort of tasteful collage of images with her photo 'next' to theirs but not shopped into it. If they're the type to like the angel-in-the-sky feel then that may be appropriate.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JasonRussell
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
939 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Norfolk Va.
     
Feb 09, 2009 14:17 |  #7

TheHoff wrote in post #7289021 (external link)
I think what seems odd to us about this is that a photograph is a document of an event or a time in people's lives. What she's asking for is for you to create a memory and a time that never really happened -- the last time her kids were together -- and this seems like fakery to us. You might suggest to her that this sort of memorial might be more appropriate painted as an oil on canvas from photographs rather than an actual photo.

Very well put ;)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CBO
Member
Avatar
60 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 12, 2009 14:23 |  #8

what about just putting an oval cameo type picture of her in the corner?


Canon Rebel XSi
w/ EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS (kit lens)
and 55-250mm f4-5.6 EFS IS
Canon Power Shot S3 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Feb 16, 2009 02:06 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

I think you're blowing it up for more than it is, just do it if you want to or don't if you don't want to. I'd do it, it's no big deal in my eyes, give the family what they want and desire..who cares about ethics? They just want to remember their kid, no big deal.


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Vuleta
Goldmember
Avatar
4,239 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
     
Feb 16, 2009 02:47 |  #10

CBO wrote in post #7312235 (external link)
what about just putting an oval cameo type picture of her in the corner?


I agree with this. A few years ago, at a family re-union, I took some family group shots & latter added a picture of our recently departed Mother in an upper corner.

She actually stands out and the finished shot is "more" of a tribute to her rather than a standard group shot with her photoshopped in.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elguapo
Senior Member
348 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Texas
     
Feb 17, 2009 16:55 |  #11

JasonRussell wrote in post #7288692 (external link)
How, as a mother, could you think that altering a family portrait and adding in your deceased daughter, is a good idea?

Am I making a big deal out of this or what?

What the family is requesting is common among bereaved families. Some also take large photos of their deceased child to portrait sessions. If you want more ideas, advice, or the perspective of bereaved parents, try asking at NOWISLEEP.COM, which is the discussion forum of Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep (NILMDTS.ORG.)

NILMDTS was featured in the 09 Feb 2009 issue of Newsweek. Here is a link to an online article. http://www.newsweek.co​m/id/182665 (external link).

There are many bereaved parents and professional photographers who are part of that organization. Professional photographer Sandy Puc (www.expressionsphotos​.com (external link)) from Colorado is a co-founder.


Love without truth is hypocrisy; Truth without love is brutality.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Feb 17, 2009 17:04 |  #12

I don't think it is odd at all. God send sends stuff our way from time to time to help ease the pain of loss. It does not have to be perfect. In fact I would guess that anything you do would be greatly appreciated. Do the best you can and then see how it looks.

I have had a few instances like this. One was my former landlord that passed away due to cancer. The only shot they had of him was a group shot from wallymart. He had terrible skin lesions, thick glasses with some serious reflections. His jacket was missing as he was in the back row. I recreated the jacket, added a tie, eliminated the reflections and turned it into a head shot for his headstone.

You can do this, use the love you had for her to guide your skills.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgrussell
Looking around nervously
Avatar
18,758 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ USA
     
Feb 17, 2009 17:10 |  #13

There's nothing at all unusual about this request. It's been done since the early days of photography. (Trust me: I'm a genealogist.) But if you personally are not comfortable, or feel your skills aren't up to the task, Just Say No.


-- jgr
blog (external link) | gear | my birds (external link)http://photos.jgrussel​l.com/gallery/7381653_​pK9fK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,319 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1604
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Feb 17, 2009 17:25 |  #14

Doesn't seem all that odd to me, especially in a world where people stuff there pets and keep the ashes of their loved ones on a mantle.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,214 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Photoshopping the deceased
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1135 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.